Alpha Modus v. Brookshire Grocery: Digital Display Patent Case Ends in Settlement
Que souhaitez-vous faire ensuite ?
Choisissez votre parcours en fonction de vos besoins actuels :
📋 Résumé de l'affaire
| Nom de l'affaire | Alpha Modus, Corp. v. Brookshire Grocery Co. |
| Numéro de dossier | 2:24-cv-00919 |
| Tribunal | District Est du Texas |
| Durée | Nov 2024 – Mar 2026 482 days (1 year, 4 months) |
| Résultat | Rejeté avec préjudice (règlement) |
| Brevets en cause | |
| Produits incriminés | Grocery TV Digital Display Platform deployed within Brookshire Grocery stores |
Aperçu du dossier
Les parties
⚖️ Demandeur
A patent assertion entity with an IP portfolio focused on consumer-facing digital display systems, audience engagement technology, and retail analytics.
🛡️ Défendeur
A privately held regional supermarket chain operating hundreds of retail grocery locations across the Southern United States.
Brevets en cause
This lawsuit involved five U.S. patents asserted by Alpha Modus, all related to intelligent, audience-responsive digital signage systems and consumer engagement in retail environments. These patents cover technologies such as targeting logic, display management, and consumer interaction frameworks relevant to in-store retail environments.
- • US11042890B2 — Digital display and consumer engagement systems
- • US11301880B2 — Methods for managing digital display advertising
- • US10977672B2 — Context-aware digital advertising platforms
- • US10360571B2 — Systems for targeted content delivery
- • US10853825B2 — Audience-responsive digital display technology
Deploying a similar digital display product?
Check if your digital signage implementation might infringe these or related patents before launch.
Le verdict et l'analyse juridique
Résultat
On March 9, 2026, the court accepted a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. No. 34), filed jointly by Alpha Modus and Brookshire Grocery. This outcome typically signals a confidential settlement agreement between the parties, with each party bearing its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
Principales questions juridiques
This case highlights Alpha Modus’s continued patent assertion campaign across the retail technology sector. The assertion of five patents simultaneously against a single defendant, Brookshire Grocery, strengthens the plaintiff’s leverage in licensing negotiations. For companies utilizing third-party digital display platforms like Grocery TV, this case underscores the importance of conducting thorough Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) analysis and securing robust vendor indemnification clauses.
Analyse de la liberté d'exploitation (FTO)
This case highlights critical IP risks in digital signage and in-store media. Choose your next step:
📋 Comprendre l'impact de cette affaire
Découvrez les risques et les implications spécifiques liés à ce litige.
- Voir les 5 brevets associés à cette technologie
- Découvrez quelles sont les entreprises les plus actives dans le domaine des brevets liés à l'affichage numérique
- Comprendre les modèles d'interprétation des revendications
🔍 Vérifier les risques liés à mon produit
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own digital display technology or product.
- Input your product description or display technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking digital display patents
- Obtenir un rapport d'évaluation des risques exploitable
Zone à haut risque
Intelligent, audience-responsive digital signage
5 brevets connexes
In digital display technology space
Options de contournement
Available for similar claims
✅ Points clés à retenir
Dismissal with prejudice and mutual cost-bearing strongly indicates a private settlement; financial terms were not publicly disclosed.
Rechercher la jurisprudence connexe →Alpha Modus’s five-patent assertion against a single retail operator reflects an aggressive NPE portfolio strategy common in digital signage litigation.
Découvrez les stratégies NPE →Foire aux questions
Alpha Modus asserted five U.S. patents: US11042890B2, US11301880B2, US10977672B2, US10360571B2, and US10853825B2 — all related to digital display and consumer engagement technologies.
The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. No. 34), indicating a private resolution. The court accepted the stipulation on March 9, 2026; each party bore its own legal costs. The ‘with prejudice’ designation means Alpha Modus cannot re-file the same claims against Brookshire on the same patents.
It reinforces the pattern of patent assertion entity (NPE) claims against retail operators deploying third-party digital display platforms and underscores the importance of Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) analysis and strong vendor indemnification for companies in this space. For R&D teams, it highlights the need for due diligence when integrating third-party retail tech.
Ready to Strengthen Your Digital Display Patent Strategy?
Join 18,000+ IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyse competitive landscapes with AI-powered precision for retail technology and digital signage.
Références
- PACER – Case 2:24-cv-00919, E.D. Texas
- Office américain des brevets et des marques — Base de données des textes intégraux des brevets
- Eastern District of Texas Court Website
- World Intellectual Property Organization — Industrial Design Protection
- PatSnap — Solutions de veille en matière de propriété intellectuelle pour les cabinets d'avocats
Cet article est publié à titre purement informatif et ne constitue en aucun cas un avis juridique. Toutes les informations relatives aux affaires sont tirées de dossiers judiciaires accessibles au public. Pour en savoir plus sur les fonctionnalités de la plateforme, rendez-vous sur PatSnap.