Empire Technological Group v. Light & Wonder: Gaming Patent Dispute Ends in Dismissal
Que souhaitez-vous faire ensuite ?
Choisissez votre parcours en fonction de vos besoins actuels :
📋 Résumé de l'affaire
| Nom de l'affaire | Empire Technological Group Limited v. Light & Wonder, Inc. et al. |
| Numéro de dossier | 2:22-cv-00923 (Nev. Dist. Court) |
| Tribunal | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Durée | June 2022 – July 2024 2 years 1 month |
| Résultat | Rejeté avec préjudice |
| Brevets en cause | |
| Produits incriminés | I-Score Plus, I-Score Ultra, i-Table |
Aperçu du dossier
Les parties
⚖️ Demandeur
Developer and supplier of electronic gaming display products under brands like Smrt Choice™, Smrt Trend Board™, and Smrt Trend Wall™.
🛡️ Défendeur
Major publicly traded gaming technology company and its subsidiary (now LNW Gaming, Inc.) designing and supplying gaming systems globally.
Le brevet en cause
This case involved U.S. Patent No. US11341807B2, covering technology applicable to electronic gaming tables and display panels. The patent relates to display and interface systems used in table game environments — a growing segment of casino floor technology that integrates digital scoreboards, trend boards, and player-facing displays into traditional table games. It was registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
- • US11341807B2 — Electronic gaming tables and display panel technology.
Designing a similar gaming product?
Check if your electronic gaming table or display might infringe this or related patents before launch.
Le verdict et l'analyse juridique
Résultat
The case terminated via stipulated dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Both parties jointly requested the dismissal, indicating a private resolution. No damages amount was publicly disclosed, and no injunctive relief was awarded or denied through court order. This outcome closes Case No. 2:22-cv-00923 after more than two years of litigation.
Principales questions juridiques
The infringement action proceeded through the district court without producing a public merits ruling. The dismissal with prejudice operates as a final adjudication, barring Empire from re-filing the same infringement claims against Light & Wonder on the same patent. The absence of a public Markman (claim construction) ruling means the claim scope of US11341807B2 remains judicially undefined from this case — preserving flexibility for future assertion or licensing negotiations by Empire.
Analyse de la liberté d'exploitation (FTO)
This case highlights critical IP risks in electronic gaming display technology. Choose your next step:
📋 Comprendre l'impact de cette affaire
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation in gaming tech.
- View related patents in electronic gaming display space
- See which companies are most active in gaming display patents
- Understand claim construction patterns for gaming interfaces
🔍 Vérifier les risques liés à mon produit
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own electronic gaming technology or product.
- Saisissez la description de votre produit ou ses caractéristiques techniques.
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents (like US11341807B2)
- Get actionable risk assessment report for gaming products
Zone à haut risque
Electronic gaming table display systems
1 Brevet en cause
US11341807B2 & related applications
Contournements stratégiques
Possible for display and interface claims
✅ Points clés à retenir
Stipulated dismissal with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) forecloses re-assertion against the same defendants — negotiate terms carefully before stipulating.
Rechercher la jurisprudence connexe →Counter-claim leverage (invalidity, non-infringement) is an effective settlement accelerator even when ultimately withdrawn.
Explorer les précédents →Nevada is a strategically viable venue for gaming technology patent disputes given industry nexus.
Analyser les statistiques du lieu →Foire aux questions
U.S. Patent No. US11341807B2 (Application No. US16/918428), covering technology applicable to electronic gaming tables and display panels.
Both parties jointly stipulated to dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), indicating a private resolution. Specific terms were not publicly disclosed.
The dismissal without a merits ruling leaves US11341807B2’s validity intact and claim scope judicially undefined, preserving Empire’s ability to assert the patent against other parties in the gaming display sector.
FTO analysis in gaming technology involves searching and analyzing existing patents, like US11341807B2, to ensure that a new product or design (e.g., electronic gaming table, display system) can be commercialized without infringing valid intellectual property rights of others.
Prêt à renforcer votre stratégie en matière de brevets ?
Rejoignez plus de 18 000 professionnels de la propriété intellectuelle qui utilisent PatSnap Eureka pour effectuer des recherches d'antériorité, rédiger des brevets et analyser le paysage concurrentiel avec une précision optimisée par l'IA.
Références
- United States District Court, District of Nevada — Case 2:22-cv-00923
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office — US11341807B2
- Cornell Legal Information Institute — Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
- PatSnap — IP Intelligence Solutions for Gaming Industry
Cet article est publié à titre purement informatif et ne constitue en aucun cas un avis juridique. Toutes les informations relatives aux affaires sont tirées de dossiers judiciaires accessibles au public. Pour en savoir plus sur les fonctionnalités de la plateforme, rendez-vous sur PatSnap.