Stojo Products vs. Schedule A Defendants: Voluntary Dismissal in Collapsible Tumbler Design Patent Case
Que souhaitez-vous faire ensuite ?
Choisissez votre parcours en fonction de vos besoins actuels :
📋 Résumé de l'affaire
| Nom de l'affaire | Stojo Products, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A |
| Numéro de dossier | 1:23-cv-06644 (N.D. Ill.) |
| Tribunal | Tribunal fédéral de première instance pour le district nord de l'Illinois |
| Durée | Aug 2023 – Apr 2024 7 months 26 days |
| Résultat | Case Closed – Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice |
| Brevets en cause | |
| Produits incriminés | Collapsible travel tumbler (Shein seller “Intelligent Deals”) |
Aperçu du dossier
Les parties
⚖️ Demandeur
Consumer lifestyle brand recognized for its innovative collapsible, reusable drinkware products, including its flagship collapsible cup and tumbler lines.
🛡️ Défendeur
Identified collectively under the “Schedule A” complaint structure. The operative defendant at dismissal was Shein seller “Intelligent Deals” (Platform Seller ID: 9753835049).
Le brevet en cause
This case involved a design patent covering the ornamental design of a collapsible travel tumbler. Design patents are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and protect ornamental appearance rather than functional technology. Under 35 U.S.C. § 171, a design patent covers what a product *looks like*, assessed under the “ordinary observer” test established in *Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.*, 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
- • US D756,705S — Ornamental design of a collapsible travel tumbler
Vous concevez un produit similaire ?
Check if your collapsible tumbler design might infringe this or related patents before launch.
Le verdict et l'analyse juridique
Résultat
The case was terminated by **voluntary dismissal with prejudice** pursuant to **Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i)**, filed by plaintiff Stojo Products on April 26, 2024. The dismissal applied specifically to defendant “Intelligent Deals” operating on the Shein platform (Seller ID: 9753835049).
A dismissal *with prejudice* is legally significant: it constitutes an adjudication on the merits under Rule 41, permanently barring Stojo from refiling the same claims against this defendant. No damages amount was disclosed in the public record.
Principales questions juridiques
Because the case resolved by voluntary dismissal rather than judicial ruling, there is no published legal analysis of infringement or validity from the court. This is common in Schedule A litigation, where defendants settle quietly or plaintiffs dismiss after extracting settlement terms. The “with prejudice” designation suggests either a settlement agreement with a covenant not to sue, or a deliberate strategic decision by Stojo to close out this particular defendant finally.
While this case produces no binding precedent, it reflects an important pattern in design patent enforcement: **the Northern District of Illinois Schedule A framework functions as a pressure mechanism**, not necessarily a path to trial. The filing itself—combined with potential TRO-driven platform enforcement—often achieves the plaintiff’s enforcement goals before any court ruling on the merits.
Analyse de la liberté d'exploitation (FTO)
This case highlights critical IP risks in **collapsible tumbler designs**. Choose your next step:
📋 Comprendre l'impact de cette affaire
Découvrez les risques et les implications spécifiques liés à ce litige.
- View the 1 related patent in this technology space
- Découvrez quelles entreprises sont les plus actives en matière de brevets de conception
- Understand claim construction patterns for collapsible drinkware
🔍 Vérifier les risques liés à mon produit
Effectuez une analyse FTO complète pour votre propre technologie ou produit.
- Saisissez la description de votre produit ou ses caractéristiques techniques.
- L'IA identifie les brevets susceptibles de constituer un obstacle
- Obtenir un rapport d'évaluation des risques exploitable
Zone à haut risque
Collapsible tumbler designs
1 Brevet en cause
In collapsible drinkware design space
Options de contournement
Disponible pour la plupart des réclamations
✅ Points clés à retenir
Voluntary dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) terminates claims permanently—confirm settlement terms are secured before filing.
Rechercher la jurisprudence connexe →Schedule A complaints remain a high-utility enforcement vehicle in the Northern District of Illinois for design patent holders against e-commerce sellers.
Explorer les précédents →Foire aux questions
The case involved U.S. Design Patent No. USD756705S (Application No. US29/525399), protecting the ornamental design of a collapsible travel tumbler.
Plaintiff Stojo Products filed a voluntary dismissal with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) against Shein seller “Intelligent Deals,” likely reflecting a negotiated resolution or strategic enforcement decision. No court ruling on the merits was issued.
It reinforces that U.S. design patent holders actively enforce rights against e-commerce marketplace sellers, and that the Northern District of Illinois remains a preferred venue for such actions.
Prêt à renforcer votre stratégie en matière de brevets ?
Rejoignez plus de 18 000 professionnels de la propriété intellectuelle qui utilisent PatSnap Eureka pour effectuer des recherches d'antériorité, rédiger des brevets et analyser le paysage concurrentiel avec une précision optimisée par l'IA.
Références
- United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Case 1:23-cv-06644 via PACER
- Google Patents — US Design Patent No. D756,705
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office — Design Patent Resources (USPTO)
- Cornell Legal Information Institute — Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 & 35 U.S.C. § 171
- PatSnap — Solutions de veille en matière de propriété intellectuelle pour les cabinets d'avocats
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. All case information is drawn from publicly available court records, including PACER and Google Patents. For platform capabilities, visit PatSnap.