Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

EV bidirectional charging patent landscape 2026

EV Bidirectional Charging Technology Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Insights
Innovation Intelligence

Bidirectional EV charging — enabling power flow both to and from the vehicle battery — has evolved from a research concept into a commercialisation-ready technology. With 25 manufacturers already fielding hardware in Germany and CCS Type 2 validated for V2G, the remaining bottleneck is regulatory, not technical.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 11 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

From Concept to Commercialisation: Three Phases of Bidirectional EV Charging Innovation

Bidirectional EV charging — enabling power flow both to and from the vehicle battery — has followed a clear three-phase innovation trajectory from 2010 to 2023. The technology field spans three primary technical domains: on-board bidirectional charger (OBC) topologies, Vehicle-to-Grid/X power exchange protocols and infrastructure, and integrated charging-traction systems that repurpose motor drive inverters for bidirectional power flow.

25
Vehicle manufacturers with bidirectional capability in Germany (2023)
~€200
Modelled V2G revenue per EV per year (2019 German market prices)
44 kW
Level 3 AC fast charging capacity in reviewed iOBC topologies
93%
Reduction in V2V protocol completion time via ICN vs. centralised approaches

The Foundational Phase (2010–2016) established standardisation frameworks and conceptual V2G architectures. Hydro-Quebec filed four bidirectional charging system patents in Canada in 2014–2015, covering terminal-side power modulation, minimum state-of-charge user controls, and LiFePO4 battery integration. Portland State University produced an early technology roadmap for smart V2G residential chargers in 2016.

The Development and Validation Phase (2018–2021) saw research activity accelerate sharply, with power electronics topology optimisation, integrated charger-traction systems, and real-world V2G protocol testing. Shandong University published a novel charging-driving integrated topology leveraging two-stator motor inverters for V2G functionality in 2021. Vrije Universiteit Brussel’s MOBI-EPOWER group published detailed integrated OBC topology reviews covering Level 3 AC fast charging at up to 44 kW.

The Commercialisation and Market Readiness Phase (2022–2023) — the most recent cluster — shifts toward market enablement: regulatory readiness assessments, real-world V2H testing, electricity market participation modelling, and V2X under Cyber-Physical Power Systems. A 2023 European market readiness assessment by JARA-Energy identified 25 vehicle manufacturers with bidirectional charging capability in Germany alone, signalling transition from prototype to commercial deployment.

Figure 1 — EV Bidirectional Charging Innovation Phase Timeline (2010–2023)
EV Bidirectional Charging Innovation Phase Timeline: Foundational, Development, and Commercialisation Phases Foundational 2010 – 2016 Development 2018 – 2021 Commercialisation 2022 – 2023 Standards & V2G concepts Topology optimisation & testing Market readiness & real-world V2H
The field has moved through three distinct phases over 13 years, with the 2022–2023 cluster marking the shift to product-level validation and regulatory engagement.

The Hardware Layer: OBC Topologies and Integrated Charger-Traction Systems

Two-stage and single-stage bidirectional on-board charger (OBC) topologies represent the dominant hardware architecture for bidirectional EV charging. Two-stage designs — AC-DC rectification followed by an isolated DC-DC stage — offer better power quality and grid compliance; single-stage designs prioritise power density, a critical constraint in passenger EVs. A comprehensive review at McMaster University identifies both structures as the dominant topologies, noting that limited vehicle space and the need for high power density drive ongoing design tradeoffs.

What is an Integrated On-Board Charger-Traction (iOBC) System?

An iOBC repurposes the vehicle’s traction inverter and motor windings as an active filtering and conversion system during charging, eliminating dedicated charger hardware. This reduces vehicle weight and cost while making the same power-handling capacity used for propulsion available for grid injection — a key advantage for V2G applications.

A growing subset of innovation repurposes the traction inverter and motor windings as an active filtering and conversion system during charging. Shandong University’s 2021 publication designs a two-stator motor and inverter topology that transforms into a charging system, with a supercapacitor-battery hybrid power system improving startup performance and V2G functionality. Vrije Universiteit Brussel’s MOBI-EPOWER group (2022) analyses component count, switching frequency, and Level 3 AC fast charging feasibility for integrated topologies — covering configurations up to 44 kW. Politecnico di Milano (2020) covers converter topologies and power flow direction optimisation using genetic algorithms.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel’s MOBI-EPOWER group reviewed integrated on-board charger-traction (iOBC) topologies for electric vehicles covering Level 3 AC fast charging at up to 44 kW, analysing component count, switching frequency, and V2G feasibility in a 2022 publication.

Control strategies for both OBC types cover total harmonic distortion (THD) minimisation, switching frequency optimisation, and settling/rise time management for both charging and traction modes. University of Minho (2022) provides a broad survey of power electronics technologies and applications for EV battery charging systems, complementing the topology-specific reviews from McMaster and VUB. According to IEEE, power electronics standardisation for bidirectional converters remains an active area of technical committee work, reinforcing the significance of these academic topology reviews.

Figure 2 — Bidirectional EV Charging Technology Cluster Map
Bidirectional EV Charging Technology Clusters: OBC Topologies, Integrated Charger-Traction, V2X Protocols, Energy Market Algorithms OBC Topologies Two-stage & single-stage AC-DC/DC-DC THD minimisation · switching frequency McMaster · U. Minho · VUB Integrated Charger-Traction Traction inverter repurposed for charging Up to 44 kW Level 3 AC · supercapacitor hybrid Shandong U. · VUB · Politecnico di Milano V2X Grid Protocols & Infrastructure ISO 15118-2 · CCS Type 2 · CHAdeMO · EVPE AI dispatch · DLT · IoT integration Powerdale/VUB · NTNU · Hydro-Quebec Energy Market Algorithms Day-ahead & intraday market participation ~€200/EV/yr revenue · MILP optimisation FfE Munich · Carnegie/Stanford · TU Munich Hardware Integration Protocols Market & Algorithms
Innovation in the bidirectional EV charging field clusters into four distinct technical areas, with academic institutions distributed across Europe, Asia, and North America leading each cluster.

Explore the full patent and literature landscape for bidirectional EV charging topologies in PatSnap Eureka.

Explore OBC Patent Data in PatSnap Eureka →

Grid Protocols, Infrastructure, and the CCS Type 2 Standard

V2G operation requires standardised digital handshaking between vehicle and infrastructure, and the ISO 15118-2 protocol over Combined Charging System (CCS) Type 2 connectors has now been validated for European markets — resolving a critical interoperability barrier that had previously limited V2G to CHAdeMO connectors. The 2022 Powerdale/VUB study performed the first validation of V2G via CCS Type 2 and ISO 15118-2 on a Bosch passenger vehicle, characterising efficiency, signal delay, and noise precision.

“V2G was previously only commercially available via CHAdeMO connectors — the 2022 CCS Type 2 / ISO 15118-2 validation resolves a long-standing interoperability barrier for the European market.”

The infrastructure-side components — bidirectional EVSE, now termed Electric Vehicle Power Exchange Equipment (EVPE) — are also evolving. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2022) articulates a clear trajectory toward EVPE infrastructure incorporating AI-driven dispatch, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) for secure peer-to-peer energy transactions, and IoT for real-time system monitoring. This framing of V2X within Cyber-Physical Power Systems positions bidirectional charging as a node in a broader digital energy network, not merely a hardware upgrade to existing EVSE.

The ISO 15118-2 protocol over CCS Type 2 connectors was validated for V2G operation in European markets in a 2022 study by Powerdale and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, which performed the first V2G validation on a Bosch passenger vehicle, characterising efficiency, signal delay, and noise precision.

Hydro-Quebec’s patented bidirectional terminal family — four CA-jurisdiction patents filed in 2014 and published in 2015 — represents early infrastructure-side hardware innovation. The system connects a bidirectional terminal to the electrical network with a control panel allowing user-specified minimum battery state of charge and grid event-driven power modulation via a network control system. All four patents carry inactive legal status, providing prior art clarity for North American market entrants. Standardisation bodies including ISO and IEC continue to develop the standards underpinning these protocol architectures.

The Croatia case study from University of Zagreb (2020) demonstrates that 10-minute time-step fast V2G charging offers more grid flexibility opportunities than standard charging — a finding with direct implications for infrastructure investment decisions in markets with high renewable penetration. The Stanford macro-energy model (Carnegie Institution for Science / Stanford, 2022) quantifies that bidirectional EVs substantially reduce grid-battery storage requirements in wind and solar systems, making the case for V2G investment at the system level.

Application Domains: V2G, V2H, Fleet, and Peer-to-Peer Charging

Bidirectional EV charging spans five distinct application domains, each with different technical requirements, market dynamics, and maturity levels. Grid services (V2G) represent the largest application domain in the dataset, with EV batteries providing ancillary services — frequency regulation, peak shaving, and renewable energy integration — to transmission and distribution grids. The University of Tokyo (2022) documents V2G as broadly in testing phase but approaching commercial readiness.

Residential and Building Services (V2H / V2B)

Bidirectional charging for household energy management (V2H) and building-level backup power is validated in commercial hardware tests. The 2023 Politecnico di Milano real-world test demonstrates V2H performance using a commercial bidirectional charger integrated with a PV simulator and household appliances, reporting practical constraints of current commercial bidirectional charger hardware. Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories) highlights V2H and V2G as key emerging EV technologies for smart cities.

Shared Autonomous and Fleet Operations

Shared autonomous electric vehicles (SAEVs) represent a high-value V2G application because fleet vehicles have predictable dwell times. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2023) reviews optimisation models for locating charging infrastructure for SAEVs with V2G feasibility, noting that mobility demand and grid constraints must be co-optimised. This co-optimisation requirement makes fleet V2G a more tractable problem than residential V2G, where individual driver behaviour introduces significant uncertainty.

Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) Peer-to-Peer Charging

Emerging V2V applications allow surplus-energy EVs to charge energy-deficient EVs without grid intermediation. Tennessee Tech University proposes an Information Centric Networking (ICN) protocol for ad-hoc V2V coordination, achieving a 93% reduction in protocol completion time versus centralised approaches. Kyushu University extends this to wireless charging-discharging lanes (WCDLs) using decentralised P2P trading for bidirectional energy exchange between moving EVs and road infrastructure.

Tennessee Tech University’s Information Centric Networking (ICN) protocol for Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) charging coordination achieves a 93% reduction in protocol completion time compared to centralised approaches, enabling ad-hoc peer-to-peer EV charging without grid intermediation.

Heavy-Duty and Commercial Transport

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland’s pre-normative roadmap identifies pantograph-on-roof and plug-based interfaces as the primary charging interfaces for heavy-duty EVs in Europe, with bidirectional functionality expected as a future requirement for fleet energy management. This forward-looking designation from VTT signals that heavy-duty V2G is a standards-track development rather than a speculative concept.

Key Finding: Multi-Use Case Synergy

Technical University of Munich (2023) introduces a methodology for combining multiple V2X use cases — such as V2G ancillary services, local PV self-consumption, and demand response — to simultaneously achieve profitability and systemic benefits, quantifying implementation effort reduction for combined use cases. This multi-use synergy approach directly addresses the business model challenge of justifying bidirectional charging infrastructure investment.

Market Readiness and the Regulatory Bottleneck in Europe

As of 2023, 25 vehicle manufacturers offer bidirectional charging capability in Germany — yet no European country has completed a regulatory framework for V2G. This gap between hardware readiness and regulatory enablement is the primary commercialisation bottleneck identified across the dataset. The 2023 JARA-Energy (Juelich Aachen Research Alliance) assessment documents specific blocking issues: taxation policy on discharged energy, grid code compliance requirements, and smart meter availability.

A 2023 market readiness assessment by Juelich Aachen Research Alliance (JARA-Energy) found that 25 vehicle manufacturers offered bidirectional charging capability in Germany, but identified that no European country had completed a regulatory framework for V2G, with blocking issues including taxation policy, grid code compliance, and smart meter availability.

The energy market participation modelling from Forschungsgesellschaft fur Energiewirtschaft (FfE) Munich provides the clearest quantification of commercial opportunity: a mixed integer linear rolling horizon optimisation model for day-ahead and intraday spot market participation models revenue potential of approximately 200 EUR per EV per year under 2019 German electricity market prices. This figure represents a baseline — actual revenue will vary with market design, EV battery capacity, and aggregation arrangements.

Figure 3 — V2G Market Readiness: Hardware vs. Regulatory Status in Europe (2023)
V2G Market Readiness Gap in Europe: 25 Manufacturers with Bidirectional Hardware vs. Zero Completed Regulatory Frameworks 0 5 10 15 25 25 Manufacturers with bidirectional hardware 0 EU countries with completed V2G framework Commercialisation gap
As of 2023, hardware readiness (25 manufacturers) far outpaces regulatory framework completion (0 European countries), identifying regulation as the primary V2G commercialisation bottleneck. Source: JARA-Energy, 2023.

The geographic distribution of research activity in the dataset reflects Europe’s lead in market-readiness analysis: Germany (FfE Munich, KIT, IKEM Berlin), Belgium (VUB), Italy (Politecnico di Milano, Politecnico di Torino), Norway (NTNU), and Finland (VTT) all contribute market-facing research. According to IEA reporting on smart charging, regulatory design for V2G is an active policy priority across multiple European member states, corroborating the JARA-Energy assessment’s timeline concerns.

Monitor V2G regulatory developments and competitor patent filings with PatSnap Eureka’s real-time intelligence tools.

Track V2G Regulatory Signals in PatSnap Eureka →

Strategic IP Signals and Emerging Whitespace in V2X Technology

The patent landscape for bidirectional EV charging is characterised by academic-institution dominance rather than concentration in large commercial filers — a structural signal that commercialisation IP is still consolidating and new entrants retain meaningful freedom to operate. Five strategic signals emerge from the 2022–2023 innovation cluster.

Connector standard convergence is a commercial trigger. The validation of CCS Type 2 / ISO 15118-2 for V2G in Europe resolves a long-standing interoperability barrier. R&D teams should prioritise CCS-compatible bidirectional hardware; IP strategies should target the hardware and firmware implementing ISO 15118-2 V2G extensions.

Integrated charger-traction topologies represent a differentiation opportunity. Repurposing motor inverters for bidirectional grid interaction eliminates dedicated OBC hardware, reducing cost and weight. This remains a relatively open patent space — Shandong University’s 2021 filing and the VUB review both highlight the sub-field as active but not yet dominated by large commercial filers.

Hydro-Quebec’s lapsed Canadian patents create prior art clarity. Four inactive Canadian bidirectional terminal patents from 2014–2015 provide prior art references for basic terminal architecture claims. Entrants in the North American market should analyse these claims carefully before designing around or building upon them. According to WIPO, lapsed patents enter the public domain and their claims become freely usable, though they also define the prior art landscape for subsequent filings.

Hydro-Quebec filed four bidirectional EV charging system patents in Canada (CA jurisdiction) in 2014–2015, covering terminal-side power modulation, minimum state-of-charge user controls, and LiFePO4 battery integration. All four patents carry inactive legal status as of the date of this analysis, potentially opening freedom-to-operate space in those claims for North American market entrants.

V2X under Cyber-Physical Power Systems is an emerging IP frontier. The integration of AI dispatch, blockchain-secured P2P energy trading, and IoT sensor networks into bidirectional charging infrastructure is at an early research stage with limited patent coverage — representing a high-potential IP whitespace for technology companies at the intersection of energy and digital infrastructure. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology’s 2022 framing of EVPE within Cyber-Physical Power Systems is the clearest articulation of this direction in the dataset.

Regulatory risk is the primary commercialisation bottleneck in Europe. With 25+ vehicle manufacturers already fielding bidirectional hardware in Germany but zero completed regulatory frameworks across Europe, IP strategists should monitor framework development timelines in Germany, the Netherlands, and UK as the earliest likely V2G market triggers. The PatSnap innovation intelligence platform provides IP intelligence tools specifically designed for tracking regulatory-adjacent patent activity in emerging technology markets.

“Innovation in this dataset is broadly distributed across academic institutions rather than concentrated in a small number of commercial patent filers — suggesting the field remains open to new entrants and that commercialisation IP is still consolidating.”

The multi-use case synergy work from Technical University of Munich (2023) adds a further strategic dimension: combining V2G ancillary services with local PV self-consumption and demand response reduces implementation effort for combined use cases while improving profitability. This suggests that the most defensible IP positions will be in integrated optimisation software and control systems — not just hardware topologies. PatSnap’s R&D intelligence capabilities can help teams identify white-space opportunities in this optimisation layer before the field consolidates.

Frequently asked questions

EV Bidirectional Charging Technology — Key Questions Answered

Still have questions about V2G and bidirectional EV charging technology? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a Deeper Answer →

References

  1. A Review of Bidirectional On-Board Chargers for Electric Vehicles — McMaster University, 2021
  2. An Overview of Bidirectional Electric Vehicles Charging System as a V2X under Cyber-Physical Power System — NTNU, 2022
  3. Review on Integrated On-Board Charger-Traction Systems: V2G Topologies, Control Approaches, Standards and Power Density — VUB, 2022
  4. Development and Validation of V2G Technology for Electric Vehicle Chargers Using Combo CCS Type 2 Connector Standards — Powerdale / VUB, 2022
  5. Bidirectional Recharging System for Electric Vehicle — Hydro-Quebec, CA, 2015 (inactive)
  6. Bidirectional Recharging System for Electric Vehicle — Hydro-Quebec, CA, 2015 (inactive)
  7. Bidirectional Recharging System for Electric Vehicle — Hydro-Quebec, CA, 2015 (inactive)
  8. Bidirectional Recharging System for Electric Vehicle — Hydro-Quebec, CA, 2015 (inactive)
  9. A New On-board Charging-Driving Integrated Topology for V2G Technology — Shandong University, 2021
  10. Idealized Analysis of Relative Values of Bidirectional vs. Unidirectional EV Charging in Deeply Decarbonized Electricity Systems — Carnegie Institution for Science / Stanford University, 2022
  11. Integrating Bidirectionally Chargeable Electric Vehicles into the Electricity Markets — FfE Munich, 2020
  12. Are Commercial EV Chargers Ready to Aid with Household Power Consumption? — Politecnico di Milano, 2023
  13. Vehicle-to-Grid Market Readiness in Europe with a Special Focus on Germany — JARA-Energy, 2023
  14. Utilization of Electric Vehicles for Vehicle-to-Grid Services: Progress and Perspectives — University of Tokyo, 2022
  15. Vehicle-to-Grid in Standard and Fast Electric Vehicle Charging: Comparison of Renewable Energy Source Utilization and Charging Costs — University of Zagreb, 2020
  16. Locating Charging Infrastructure for Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicles and for Vehicle-to-Grid Strategy — VUB, 2023
  17. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Charging Coordination over Information Centric Networking — Tennessee Tech University, 2022
  18. Electric Vehicle – Wireless Charging-Discharging Lane Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading — Kyushu University, 2020
  19. Synergies of Electric Vehicle Multi-Use: Analyzing the Implementation Effort for Use Case Combinations in Smart E-Mobility — Technical University of Munich, 2023
  20. Trends and Emerging Technologies for the Development of Electric Vehicles — Empa / Swiss Federal Laboratories, 2022
  21. Pre-Normative Charging Technology Roadmap for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles in Europe — VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2022
  22. Analysing the Synergic Effects of Unidirectional and Bidirectional Smart Charging Points of Electric Vehicles — Goswami, Rashi, IN, 2022 (pending)
  23. Electric Vehicles: V2G for Rapid, Safe, and Green EV Penetration — University of Nottingham, 2022
  24. Technology Roadmap for Smart Electric Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) of Residential Chargers — Portland State University, 2016
  25. Power Electronics Technologies and Applications for EV Battery Charging Systems — University of Minho, 2022
  26. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization (patent lapse and prior art guidance)
  27. IEA — International Energy Agency (smart charging and V2G policy reporting)
  28. IEEE — Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (power electronics and EV charging standards)

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This landscape is derived from a targeted set of patent and literature records and represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only — it should not be interpreted as a comprehensive view of the full industry.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo