Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Fly ash and slag in recycled concrete: 2026 trends

Supplementary Cementitious Materials 2026: Fly Ash & Slag — PatSnap Insights
Materials Science & Sustainability

A patent and literature analysis spanning 1995–2025 reveals how fly ash and granulated slag are being systematically integrated with recycled concrete aggregates to improve mechanical performance, marine durability, and eco-efficiency — and how blockchain is now entering the picture to verify recycled material use across the cement supply chain.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 8 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Fly Ash as a Performance Catalyst for Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Fly ash-based geopolymer treatment improves the mechanical characteristics of reclaimed concrete aggregates by up to 10%, and can reduce the required base layer thickness in pavement subbase applications — delivering both structural and cost benefits. This finding, documented by the National Institute of Transportation in 2023, establishes fly ash not simply as a cement replacement but as an active performance modifier for recycled aggregate systems.

70+
Patent & literature sources (1995–2025)
10%
RCA mechanical improvement via fly ash geopolymer
7 yrs
Marine exposure field monitoring period
25%+50%
Fly ash + RCA optimal eco-efficient mix

The dataset underlying this analysis encompasses over 70 sources spanning 1995 to 2025, covering the evolving intersection of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) technologies. The central insight: fly ash does not merely offset the weaknesses of recycled aggregate — it actively transforms aggregate surface chemistry through geopolymer reactions, creating binder phases that improve both mechanical behaviour and pavement layer design.

What is a fly ash geopolymer?

A geopolymer is an inorganic polymer formed when aluminosilicate materials — such as fly ash — react with an alkaline activator. In recycled aggregate applications, fly ash geopolymers coat and densify aggregate surfaces, filling micro-cracks from prior crushing and improving overall mechanical performance without relying on Portland cement clinker.

Research published by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya in 2021 quantified the optimal ratio: concrete containing 25% fly ash combined with 50% uncarbonated recycled concrete aggregate was identified as the most eco-efficient formulation across three performance dimensions — compressive strength, carbonation resistance, and chloride resistance. This combination provides a practical benchmark for procurement and specification teams working on sustainable concrete projects.

Fly ash-based geopolymer treatment of reclaimed concrete aggregates improves their mechanical characteristics by up to 10% and enables reduction of required pavement base layer thickness, according to the National Institute of Transportation (2023).

Figure 1 — Fly Ash and RCA Mix Proportions: Eco-Efficiency Performance Ratings
Fly Ash and Recycled Concrete Aggregate Mix Eco-Efficiency: Compressive Strength, Carbonation Resistance, Chloride Resistance 0 25 50 75 100 Relative Performance Score 50 45 40 0% FA 0% RCA 60 55 50 25% FA 0% RCA 83 78 75 ★ OPTIMAL 25% FA 50% RCA 35 30 25 0% FA 50% RCA Compressive Strength Carbonation Resistance Chloride Resistance
The 25% fly ash + 50% RCA combination (highlighted) was identified as the most eco-efficient formulation across all three performance dimensions by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2021). Scores are illustrative rankings based on the published eco-efficiency assessment; RCA-only mixes show reduced performance across all metrics.

The Arab International University’s 2017 research broadens this evidence base, showing that SCMs generally improve both compressive strength and modulus of elasticity compared to recycled aggregate concrete on its own — with notable gains in water permeability and chloride penetrability. These dual mechanical and durability benefits make SCM-integrated RCA concrete a practical candidate for applications ranging from structural slabs to pavement subbase layers, according to WIPO‘s sustainable materials innovation frameworks.

Slag in Roadbed and Water-Permeable Applications: Patent Evidence from Japan

Iron and steel slag particles smaller than 0.425mm, combined with recycled concrete aggregate at particle diameter 0.425mm and above, prevent roadbed mudding and bearing power loss after traffic release — a formulation patented by Nippon Steel Corporation in 1995 and reinforced in a 2001 continuation. These foundational patents establish the particle size logic that underpins slag’s role in recycled roadbed materials.

Nippon Steel Corporation’s 1995 patent specifies that iron and steel slag particles with diameter below 0.425mm, combined with recycled concrete aggregate of diameter 0.425mm and above, achieve particle size distributions conforming to JIS-A-5001 standards, preventing muddy road conditions and compaction defects after traffic release.

The engineering logic is precise: during and after traffic loading, fine particles migrate upward within a road bed layer. When these fine particles are sourced from recycled concrete aggregate alone, they can cause compaction defects and reduce bearing power. Slag, however, provides controlled fine-particle replacement with latent hydraulic properties — meaning the slag fraction can develop additional strength over time when activated, rather than simply filling space.

“Granulated slag at 23–47 mass% with reclaimed aggregates leverages latent hydraulic properties that natural aggregates lack — an activation mechanism unavailable in conventional roadbed materials.”

Taihei Kogyo Co., Ltd.’s 2002 patent extends this logic to water-permeable base materials. The formulation specifies reclaimed aggregates at 50–70 mass% with 5–30mm grain size, combined with granulated slag exceeding 23 mass% and less than 47 mass%, plus 3–7 mass% additives including an alkaline stimulator to initiate latent hydraulic activation. The result is a base material that achieves water permeability while maintaining structural strength — a combination that natural aggregate systems cannot replicate without significant binder additions.

Key finding: Reducing period slag in ATK cement

Nano Concrete Industry Co., Ltd.’s 2001 patent describes ATK cement consisting of 65–80 wt.% reducing period slag and 20–35 wt.% gypsum, combined with recycled aggregate to achieve mechanical performance equivalent to concrete made with natural aggregate — providing a clinker-free pathway to standard structural performance.

Figure 2 — Slag Content Ranges in Key Patent Formulations for Recycled Concrete Applications
Granulated Slag Content Ranges in Supplementary Cementitious Materials Patents: Roadbed and Water-Permeable Concrete Applications 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Mass fraction (%) Taihei Kogyo (2002) Granulated slag 23–47 mass% Nano Concrete (2001) Reducing period slag (ATK cement) 65–80 wt% Nippon Steel (1995/2001) Fine slag (<0.425mm) replaces RCA fines Fine particle cut
Slag content ranges from three key patents: Taihei Kogyo specifies granulated slag at 23–47 mass% for water-permeable bases; Nano Concrete’s ATK cement uses 65–80 wt.% reducing period slag; Nippon Steel’s approach targets the fine particle fraction below 0.425mm. Source: PatSnap patent dataset (1995–2002).

Explore the full patent landscape for slag and fly ash concrete innovations in PatSnap Eureka.

Search SCM Patents in PatSnap Eureka →

SCMs, Marine Durability, and Eco-Efficiency Benchmarks Across Seven Years

Fly ash RCA concrete with a 15–25% fly ash content and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.40 demonstrated superior resistance to marine attack compared to natural aggregate concrete over a seven-year exposed period in Thailand’s Gulf tidal zone — a finding that challenges the conventional assumption that recycled aggregate concrete is inherently inferior in aggressive environments. This long-term field result from Burapha University (2021) is among the most significant performance validations in the dataset.

A seven-year field monitoring study by Burapha University (2021) in Thailand’s Gulf tidal zone found that recycled aggregate concrete containing 15–25% fly ash with a water-to-binder ratio of 0.40 demonstrated superior resistance to marine attack compared to natural aggregate concrete over the full exposure period.

The durability advantage is attributable to the pozzolanic reaction: fly ash reacts with calcium hydroxide released during cement hydration, producing additional calcium silicate hydrate phases that densify the concrete microstructure and reduce ionic transport pathways — the principal mechanism behind chloride and sulfate ingress in marine zones. Standards bodies including ISO and research institutions affiliated with RILEM have documented these pozzolanic mechanisms extensively in concrete durability frameworks.

The eco-efficiency dimension adds a further layer of evidence. Research from Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya confirms that concrete with 25% fly ash plus 50% uncarbonated RCA is the most eco-efficient option when assessed simultaneously against compressive strength, carbonation depth, and chloride penetration resistance — meaning performance and environmental benefit align at the same mix design. This overlap between durability and circular economy metrics is relatively uncommon in materials science, and its quantification makes a compelling case for accelerating SCM-RCA adoption in specifications.

Volcanic powder emerges as a further SCM candidate from Universidad de la Frontera’s 2018 research. Up to 10% cement replacement by volcanic powder in concretes without RCA maintains mechanical properties, while a 5% volcanic powder addition combined with 30% RCA was found to offset the inherent weaknesses of RCA — demonstrating that the SCM category extends beyond the dominant fly ash and slag technologies and that regional material availability can drive formulation choices, a point also recognised by bodies such as EPFL‘s concrete sustainability research group.

Concrete containing 25% fly ash and 50% uncarbonated recycled concrete aggregate was identified as the most eco-efficient formulation based on compressive strength, carbonation resistance, and chloride resistance by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2021).

Want to benchmark eco-efficient concrete formulations against the latest patent and literature data?

Analyse with PatSnap Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Supplementary cementitious materials — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a deeper answer →

References

  1. Impact of crushing shape and geopolymerization on reclaimed concrete aggregate for recycling in the flexible pavement — National Institute of Transportation, 2023
  2. Utilization of Recycled Aggregate Concrete for Marine Site Based on 7-Year Field Monitoring — Burapha University, 2021
  3. Evaluation of Eco-Efficient Concretes Produced with Fly Ash and Uncarbonated Recycled Aggregates — Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2021
  4. Cement concrete regenerated aggregate excellent in road bed workability — Nippon Steel Corporation, 1995
  5. Cement-concrete recycled aggregate with excellent roadbed workability — Nippon Steel Corporation, 2001
  6. Water permeable base material utilizing reclaimed aggregate — Taihei Kogyo Co., Ltd., 2002
  7. Recycled concrete (ATK cement) — Nano Concrete Industry Co., Ltd., 2001
  8. Production of Greener Recycled Aggregate Concretes Using Local Supplementary Cementing Materials — Arab International University, 2017
  9. Mechanical Performance of Eco-Friendly Concretes with Volcanic Powder and Recycled Concrete Aggregates — Universidad de la Frontera, 2018
  10. Resource circulation system for cement and concrete materials — Denka Co., Ltd., 2025
  11. Recycled concrete for foundation structure: LCA case study — Czech Technical University, 2021
  12. Environmental Assessment of Two Use Cycles of Recycled Aggregate Concrete — Czech Technical University, 2019
  13. Combination of LCA and circularity index for assessment of environmental impact of recycled aggregate concrete — Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 2022
  14. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization (sustainable materials innovation frameworks)
  15. ISO — International Organization for Standardization (concrete durability standards)
  16. ASTM International (supplementary cementitious materials specifications)

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo