Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Gravity energy storage patent landscape 2026

Grid-Scale Gravity Energy Storage Technology Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Insights
Energy Storage

Grid-scale gravity energy storage is moving from academic proof-of-concept to pre-commercial infrastructure planning — with patent filings spanning five jurisdictions, a commercially active EP patent from Gravitricity, and China’s state grid operators now systematically mapping national deployment sites as of 2026.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 11 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Four Mechanistic Sub-Domains Driving GES Innovation

Grid-scale gravity energy storage (GES) converts electrical energy into gravitational potential energy — by elevating solid masses, sand, water, or other media — and recovers it on demand via controlled descent driving generators. Unlike pumped hydropower, GES unbundles this fundamental principle from dependence on water and natural topography, opening the technology to a wider range of sites and infrastructure types.

5
Patent jurisdictions in this dataset
4–24h
Target storage duration range
11 kWh
Proof-of-concept capacity (12 m shaft, Brazil 2019)
2015–2026
Dataset date range

Within this dataset, four mechanistic sub-domains emerge. Shaft-based solid-mass systems hoist heavy weights — steel, concrete, or composite masses — within purpose-built or repurposed mine shafts. Gravitricity’s active EP patent describes a multi-weight architecture using coupled and decoupled transporter linkages in a single shaft, enabling continuous power delivery across the system’s full energy capacity range; this is the most patent-active GES sub-domain in the retrieved results.

Underground mine sand/aggregate systems replace discrete weights with bulk granular material. Sand is elevated from deep mine levels to surface storage during charging and descends through vertical shafts connected to motor-generators during discharge. The University of North (Croatia) UGES concept, published in 2023, provides the most detailed academic treatment of this approach, citing advantages including no water requirement, use of decommissioned mine infrastructure, and storage capacity scalable with sand volume and shaft depth.

Wide-area terrain-based rail and slope systems move mass containers along inclined railways or slopes across natural terrain gradients. A 2026-filed CN patent from the State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute introduces a “Wide-Area Gravity Energy Storage System Potential Assessment Method” using multi-source geospatial data, slope raster analysis, and integrated carbon and economic assessment — signaling that the enabling innovation in this sub-domain has shifted from mechanical hardware to site-selection methodology.

Finally, subsurface hybrid approaches — documented in Hunaser Energy’s 2020 comparative study — benchmark underground pumped storage hydropower, compressed air energy storage (CAES), and suspended-weight gravity energy storage (SWGES) against one another, noting that closed mine voids are viable hosts for all three, with SWGES offering advantages in sites lacking aquifers or suitable geological cavities. According to IRENA, long-duration storage is one of the critical enablers of deep renewable energy integration globally.

What is Long-Duration Energy Storage (LDES)?

Long-duration energy storage refers to technologies capable of storing and discharging energy over periods of 4 hours to multiple days. GES is consistently positioned in this dataset as an LDES technology suited for durations of 4–24 hours, complementing short-duration lithium-ion batteries (0–4 hours) and very long-duration hydrogen or pumped hydro.

Grid-scale gravity energy storage encompasses four mechanistic sub-domains: shaft-based solid-mass hoisting, underground mine sand/aggregate systems, wide-area terrain-based rail or slope systems, and subsurface hybrid approaches combining hydraulic accumulation with gravity storage.

From Proof-of-Concept to Deployment Planning: The Innovation Timeline

The GES patent and literature record in this dataset spans 2015 to 2026 and follows a clear four-phase progression — from foundational academic framing through concept validation, engineering-scale patents, and finally systematic deployment methodology.

Figure 1 — Gravity Energy Storage Innovation Timeline: Phase Progression 2015–2026
Gravity Energy Storage Innovation Timeline: Four Phases from Foundational Framing (2015) to Systematic Deployment Methodology (2026) 2015 Foundational Framing Fichtner GmbH LUT quantify LDES demand 2019 Concept Validation Brazil 11 kWh proof-of-concept; IT patent filed 2022 Engineering Scale Patents Gravitricity EP; MASTINO MARCO IT filings (×3) 2026 Deployment Methodology State Grid Hebei wide-area GES assessment CN
The GES innovation record progresses from academic demand quantification (2015) through proof-of-concept systems (2019), engineering-scale patents (2022–2024), to systematic national deployment planning (2026), with dedicated GES patent filings concentrated in 2019–2026.

The pre-2019 foundational phase is characterised by academic literature establishing the systemic need for LDES technologies. Fichtner GmbH (2015) and Lappeenranta University of Technology (2016–2017) quantify storage demand in renewable-heavy grids. Gravitational storage is mentioned alongside other mechanical options but receives limited dedicated patent activity in this dataset.

The 2019–2021 concept validation phase sees the Federal University of Santa Maria (Brazil, 2019) publish a mathematical model for small-scale gravitational potential energy storage using a 12-metre shaft and 4-metre diameter piston system, demonstrating 11 kWh capacity at proof-of-concept scale. Hunaser Energy (Spain, 2020) produces the first comparative subsurface GES benchmarking paper in this dataset, and the VISENTIN ROBERTO Italian patent on “Active Hydroaccumulation of Stochastic Energies” marks early European patent activity.

The 2022–2024 engineering-scale patent phase is anchored by Gravitricity Limited’s multi-weight shaft system patent (EP, published March 2024) — the most technically detailed GES patent in this dataset. MASTINO MARCO files three related “Energy Generation and Storage System” patents in Italy across March and April 2025, and Politecnico di Torino files a hybrid wind/wave platform patent (IT, May 2024).

The 2025–2026 systematic deployment methodology phase is defined by the State Grid Hebei wide-area GES potential assessment CN patent (February 2026, pending), signaling a shift from device engineering toward deployment planning at regional and national scale. This transition — from prototype to pre-commercial infrastructure planning — is the defining characteristic of the field’s current moment.

Explore the full GES patent dataset and track new filings as they emerge in PatSnap Eureka.

Analyse GES Patents in PatSnap Eureka →

Technology Clusters and Key Patent Holders

GES patents and literature in this dataset organise into four technology clusters, each at a different maturity level and with distinct IP characteristics.

Cluster 1: Multi-Weight Shaft Hoisting Systems

The most technically mature GES architecture in this dataset. Gravitricity Limited’s EP patent (March 2024, active) describes a vertical shaft accommodating two or more independently operable heavy weights. Transporter linkages couple and decouple from weights in sequence, enabling continuous energy delivery. Critically, the path volumes of separate linkages are designed not to overlap — resolving a key mechanical conflict in single-shaft multi-weight designs and representing the critical step from single-cycle to continuous, dispatchable GES operation at utility scale.

“The path volumes of separate linkages are designed not to overlap — resolving a key mechanical conflict in single-shaft multi-weight designs and enabling continuous, dispatchable GES operation at utility scale.”

Cluster 2: Underground Mine Sand/Aggregate Gravity Storage

The UGES concept elevates sand from deep mine levels to surface stockpiles during surplus generation and recovers energy during deficit periods via controlled descent through vertical shafts connected to motor-generators. The 2023 University of North (Croatia) paper is the most detailed academic treatment in this dataset. Key advantages cited include: no water requirement, use of decommissioned mine infrastructure, scalable storage capacity proportional to sand volume and shaft depth, and no degradation of the storage medium. According to the IEA, repurposing existing industrial infrastructure for energy storage is a critical pathway for reducing the capital cost of the energy transition.

The Underground Gravity Energy Storage (UGES) concept, developed at the University of North (Croatia) and published in 2023, uses bulk sand elevated through decommissioned mine shafts as the storage medium, requiring no water and exhibiting no degradation of the storage medium over time.

Cluster 3: Wide-Area Terrain/Rail-Slope Systems and GIS-Based Site Assessment

The 2026 CN patent from State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute represents the leading edge of this cluster. The enabling innovation is not the mechanical hardware but the site-selection methodology: multi-source geospatial analysis of slope gradients, terrain mapping, centroid parameter extraction, and integrated carbon and economic assessment within a single GES siting workflow. The patent explicitly addresses stability indicators and carbon trading indicators within a full lifecycle model.

Cluster 4: Hybrid Gravity-Hydraulic and Coupled Generation-Storage Systems

Italian filings from MASTINO MARCO (three related active and pending patents, 2025) describe “Energy Generation and Storage Systems” that couple energy generation with storage in integrated architectures. The VISENTIN ROBERTO Italian patent on “Active Hydroaccumulation of Stochastic Energies” (2019) represents an earlier hybrid approach. Politecnico di Torino’s hybrid wind/wave energy extraction platform (IT, May 2024) extends this design philosophy to offshore environments, integrating gravitational or hydraulic storage with offshore renewable generation to reduce the need for separate storage assets and transmission infrastructure.

Figure 2 — GES Patent Filings by Technology Cluster and Jurisdiction (This Dataset)
Gravity Energy Storage Patent Filings by Technology Cluster and Jurisdiction in the 2026 PatSnap Dataset 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 Shaft-based (EP) 0* Underground Mine (lit. only) 1 Wide-Area Terrain (CN) 5 Hybrid Gravity- Hydraulic (IT) Patent Count * Underground mine GES is represented by academic literature only in this dataset; no dedicated patents retrieved.
Hybrid gravity-hydraulic systems (Italy) account for the largest share of dedicated GES patent filings in this dataset, while shaft-based and wide-area terrain systems each hold one significant active or pending patent in EP and CN jurisdictions respectively.

Track GES cluster activity and identify white-space opportunities with PatSnap Eureka’s patent landscape tools.

Explore Patent Landscapes in PatSnap Eureka →

Geographic and Assignee Landscape

Among the patent filings directly relevant to GES mechanisms in this dataset, five jurisdictions are represented: EP, CN, IT, and JP (adjacent multi-source configuration patent). Italy is the most active jurisdiction for GES-adjacent patent filings, with five patents across three assignees.

Assignee Jurisdiction Filing Date Status
Gravitricity Limited EP 2024 Active
State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute CN 2026 Pending
MASTINO MARCO (×3) IT 2025 Active / Pending
VISENTIN ROBERTO IT 2019 Inactive
Politecnico di Torino IT 2024 Pending
Three Gorges International Energy Investment Group JP 2026 Pending

Italy’s prominence likely reflects the country’s active decommissioned industrial and mining infrastructure alongside renewable integration targets. The five Italian patents span three assignees — MASTINO MARCO, VISENTIN ROBERTO, and Politecnico di Torino — indicating a distributed rather than concentrated innovation base.

China has one filing in this dataset — the State Grid Hebei 2026 patent — but it represents the most methodologically advanced deployment-planning patent retrieved, signaling that Chinese state grid companies are moving from technology assessment to systematic national rollout planning. For context, the IEA has documented China’s accelerating grid investment as a key driver of global energy storage demand.

Europe (EP jurisdiction) contributes one highly significant active patent from Gravitricity Limited — the most commercially advanced GES company represented in this dataset, based in the UK. Academic innovation is distributed across Europe (Croatia, Spain, Italy, UK), Brazil, and China, indicating a globally distributed research base.

Key finding: A fragmented IP landscape

Innovation in GES is not yet concentrated in a dominant industrial player. The field remains fragmented across niche startups (Gravitricity), state utilities (State Grid Hebei), academic spinouts (UGES), and individual inventors (MASTINO MARCO) — a characteristic of a technology in early pre-commercial transition.

Italy is the most active jurisdiction for gravity energy storage patent filings in this dataset, with 5 patents across 3 assignees (MASTINO MARCO, VISENTIN ROBERTO, and Politecnico di Torino), while China’s single 2026 filing from State Grid Hebei represents the most methodologically advanced deployment-planning patent in the dataset.

Emerging Directions: What 2024–2026 Filings Reveal

The most recent filings in this dataset — concentrated in 2024–2026 — reveal five forward-looking directions that define where GES innovation is heading next.

Multi-weight shaft optimisation for continuous power delivery is the focus of Gravitricity’s EP patent (March 2024). By ensuring that multiple weights can be independently operated without path-volume conflicts, this engineering refinement is the critical step from single-cycle to continuous, dispatchable GES operation at utility scale. This is the most commercially significant technical advance in the dataset.

Wide-area GIS-integrated site assessment for terrain-based GES is introduced by the State Grid Hebei CN patent (February 2026). The patent incorporates automated slope analysis, multi-source geospatial data fusion, carbon emission quantification, and economic assessment into a single GES siting methodology. This signals that the Chinese state grid ecosystem is preparing for systematic nationwide GES deployment, moving the technology from pilot to infrastructure planning stage.

Hybrid offshore gravity-energy platforms are represented by Politecnico di Torino’s hybrid wind/wave energy extraction platform (IT, May 2024). This suggests an emerging design philosophy of integrating gravitational or hydraulic storage mechanisms with offshore renewable generation — reducing the need for separate storage assets and transmission infrastructure.

Carbon trading integration in GES economic models is a feature of the Three Gorges International JP filing (February 2026), which explicitly incorporates carbon trading indicators alongside economic and stability indicators in the configuration methodology. This reflects the maturation of GES within carbon market frameworks, a critical enabler for project bankability. According to WIPO‘s Green Technology IP data, carbon-market integration is an increasing feature of clean energy patent claims globally.

Mine-shaft UGES as a global stranded-asset conversion strategy is the framing advanced by the University of North (Croatia) 2023 literature, which explicitly links GES viability to the global stock of decommissioned mines. This positions GES as a solution to stranded industrial assets, potentially unlocking significant policy support and financing in coal-transition regions including Central Europe, Appalachia, and the Chinese coal belt.

Figure 3 — GES Application Domains and Representative Sources in This Dataset
Gravity Energy Storage Application Domains by Number of Representative Sources in the 2026 PatSnap Dataset Sources 0 1 2 3 4 Grid Balancing & LDES 4 Abandoned Mine Repurposing 2 Renewable Energy Firming 1 Regional Grid Stability (China) 2
Grid balancing and long-duration energy storage is the dominant application domain in this dataset, represented by four sources including Sandia National Laboratories (2022) and the University of Nottingham (2021).

Strategic Implications for IP and R&D Teams

The GES patent landscape in this dataset carries five distinct strategic signals for IP professionals, R&D leaders, and technology investors evaluating this space.

IP whitespace in mechanical subsystems. The core GES claim space is lightly populated in this dataset. Weight handling, transporter linkage mechanisms, coupling and decoupling systems, and shaft sealing for multi-weight configurations represent areas where freedom to operate may still be achievable. R&D teams should conduct freedom-to-operate analysis focused on Gravitricity’s EP claim set before developing competing shaft architectures.

Mine-asset partnerships are a near-term competitive differentiator. Access to decommissioned mine shafts of adequate depth and structural integrity is a hard constraint on UGES deployment. Firms or consortia that secure option agreements on mine assets before GES reaches commercial scale will have a structural cost advantage — the asset, not the technology, may be the binding constraint.

China’s state grid is the largest near-term deployment risk and opportunity. The 2026 State Grid Hebei patent on wide-area GES potential assessment signals that Chinese grid operators are systematically identifying deployment sites. For non-Chinese GES technology developers, this creates a window to license technology into China before domestic alternatives mature; for Chinese players, it confirms the importance of protecting GES methodology IP in CN jurisdiction now.

Long-duration policy frameworks are the critical demand-side enabler. Sandia National Laboratories (2022) documents that LDES technologies — including GES — face revenue adequacy problems under current U.S. market structures. IP strategists should monitor regulatory filings at FERC, Ofgem, and equivalent bodies for LDES market design rules, as these will determine project revenues and thus investor appetite for GES at scale. The U.S. Department of Energy has identified long-duration storage as a priority area for grid modernisation funding.

GES must be positioned within hybrid storage portfolios, not as a standalone replacement. The University of Nottingham (2021) and ExxonMobil Research (2021) modelling consistently show that no single storage technology optimally covers all duration requirements. GES’s strongest value proposition is in the 4–24 hour duration range, complementing lithium-ion (0–4 hours) and hydrogen (seasonal). Product and commercial teams should design GES systems to interoperate with battery and hydrogen assets rather than compete with them.

Sandia National Laboratories (2022) documents that long-duration energy storage technologies, including gravity energy storage, face revenue adequacy problems under current U.S. market structures, making long-duration policy frameworks the critical demand-side enabler for GES commercialisation.

Frequently asked questions

Gravity energy storage — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a Deeper Answer →

References

  1. Gravitricity Limited — Gravity-based energy storage system, EP, 2024 (Active)
  2. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute — Wide-Area Gravity Energy Storage System Potential Assessment Method, CN, 2026 (Pending)
  3. University of North (Croatia) — Underground Gravity Energy Storage: A Solution for Long-Term Energy Storage, 2023
  4. Hunaser Energy — Comparing Subsurface Energy Storage Systems: Underground Pumped Storage Hydropower, CAES and SWGES, 2020
  5. Federal University of Santa Maria (Brazil) — Storage Gravitational Energy for Small Scale Industrial and Residential Applications, 2019
  6. University of Padova — Levelling the Photovoltaic Power Profile with the Integrated Energy Storage System, 2022
  7. MASTINO MARCO — Energy Generation and Storage System, IT, 2025 (Active)
  8. MASTINO MARCO — Energy Generation and Storage System, IT, 2025 (Active)
  9. MASTINO MARCO — Energy Generation and Storage System, IT, 2025 (Pending)
  10. VISENTIN ROBERTO — Active Hydroaccumulation of Stochastic Energies, IT, 2019 (Inactive)
  11. Politecnico di Torino — Hybrid Platform for Wind and Wave Energy Extraction, IT, 2024 (Pending)
  12. Three Gorges International Energy Investment Group — Multi-type Source Storage Configuration Method, JP, 2026 (Pending)
  13. Sandia National Laboratories — Long-duration energy storage in a decarbonized future: Policy gaps, needs, and opportunities, 2022
  14. University of Nottingham — Short-, Medium-, and Long-Duration Energy Storage in a 100% Renewable Electricity Grid: A UK Case Study, 2021
  15. ExxonMobil Research and Engineering — The economic and reliability impacts of grid-scale storage in a high penetration renewable energy system, 2021
  16. Guangdong University of Technology — Economic and financial appraisal of novel large-scale energy storage technologies, 2021
  17. Fichtner GmbH & Co. KG — Potential for Large Scale Energy Storage Technologies – Comparison and Ranking Including an Outlook to 2030, 2015
  18. Evolved Energy Research — Long Term Energy Storage in Highly Renewable Systems, 2020
  19. IRENA — International Renewable Energy Agency (long-duration storage policy context)
  20. IEA — International Energy Agency (energy storage and grid investment data)
  21. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization (Green Technology IP data)
  22. U.S. Department of Energy — Long-Duration Storage Shot and grid modernisation priorities

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This landscape is derived from a limited set of patent and literature records retrieved across targeted searches. It represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only and should not be interpreted as a comprehensive view of the full industry.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo