Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Low-loss dielectric materials for 5G and 6G in 2026

Low-Loss Dielectric Materials for 5G and 6G — PatSnap Insights
Materials Science

The race to enable 5G millimeter-wave and 6G terahertz systems hinges on a materials challenge: substrates that carry signals with minimal loss across frequencies from sub-6 GHz to beyond 170 GHz. This survey maps the dominant dielectric material classes, characterization innovations, and institutional contributors shaping the landscape through 2026.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 10 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Three material classes driving low-loss dielectric innovation

The low-loss dielectric materials landscape for 5G and 6G is dominated by three principal classes: polymer-based substrates (polyimide, liquid crystal polyester, and cyclo-olefin polymer), inorganic ceramic composites, and nano-structured porous composite materials. Each class addresses the same core challenge — simultaneously minimising the dielectric constant (Dk) and the dissipation factor (Df, or loss tangent) while preserving mechanical integrity, thermal stability, and moisture resistance — but via fundamentally different material strategies and across frequency regimes extending from sub-6 GHz through millimeter-wave D-band (110–170 GHz) and into the terahertz ranges targeted by 6G development.

2.23
Record Dk — non-fluorinated polyimide (TmBPPA)
7.5×10⁻⁴
Loss tangent of COP at 40 GHz (SIW filter)
0.19 g/cm³
Density of porous silica-cellulose 6G substrate
~4,000 GHz
Qf of cold-sintered ceramic composite

The dataset examined for this analysis comprises more than a dozen directly relevant technical literature entries and patents spanning 2018–2023, with additional foundational references dating to the early 2000s. Key institutional contributors span Chinese academic institutions, European research groups, and industry players including Unimicron Technology Corporation and Kyocera. According to WIPO, patent filings in wireless communication materials have intensified significantly since 2018, consistent with the commercial 5G rollout timeline. The technical concerns documented across this literature converge on a single engineering imperative: achieving near-air-like permittivity in a substrate that can survive the thermal and mechanical demands of high-volume manufacturing.

The low-loss dielectric materials landscape for 5G and 6G is dominated by three principal classes: polymer-based substrates (polyimide, liquid crystal polyester, cyclo-olefin polymer), inorganic ceramic composites, and nano-structured porous composite materials — all targeting simultaneous minimisation of dielectric constant and loss tangent at frequencies from sub-6 GHz through D-band (110–170 GHz) and into terahertz regimes.

Figure 1 — Dielectric constant (Dk) comparison across low-loss substrate material classes for 5G and 6G
Dielectric constant comparison across low-loss substrate material classes for 5G and 6G applications 1 2 3 4 Dielectric Constant (Dk) 2.23 TmBPPA PI (non-fluorinated) 3.0–4.0 Conv. Polyimide (5G packaging) ~2.9 Liquid Crystal Polyester (LCP) ~2.3 Cyclo-Olefin Polymer (COP) ~1.1 Porous Silica- Cellulose (6G) Material Class Record low Dk 6G target (near-air)
Approximate dielectric constant (Dk) values for key substrate material classes. Porous silica-cellulose nanocomposites approach air-like permittivity (~1.1) for 6G; conventional polyimide (3.0–4.0) remains inadequate for next-generation signal integrity demands. Values sourced from literature cited in this article.

Polymer substrates: from polyimide to cyclo-olefin

Polymer dielectrics have emerged as one of the most actively investigated material families for 5G and 6G substrates, driven by the need for flexible, processable materials with ultra-low loss characteristics. The central achievement in this space is the demonstration that non-fluorinated polyimide chemistry can reach record-low dielectric performance through molecular engineering alone — without the environmental concerns of fluorinated polymers and without the mechanical fragility of porous architectures.

Sun Yat-sen University researchers reported the design and synthesis of a novel amorphous polyimide designated TmBPPA, achieving a dielectric constant (k) of 2.23 and a loss tangent below 3.94 × 10⁻³ at 10⁴ Hz — claimed as the lowest among all non-fluorinated, non-porous polymers reported at that time. The design strategy exploited the secondary relaxation behaviors of polymer chains, specifically suppressing dipole reorientation mechanisms that contribute to dielectric loss. This approach, documented in 2019, represents a significant departure from the conventional assumption that fluorination is a prerequisite for ultra-low-k polymer performance.

Sun Yat-sen University’s TmBPPA polyimide achieved a dielectric constant of 2.23 and a loss tangent below 3.94 × 10⁻³ at 10⁴ Hz in 2019, reported as the lowest values among all non-fluorinated, non-porous polymers at that time. The performance was achieved by suppressing dipole reorientation via secondary relaxation engineering, eliminating the need for fluorination.

“Conventional polyimide exhibits dielectric constants in the range of 3.0–4.0 and dielectric loss of approximately 0.02 — inadequate for the signal integrity demands of high-frequency 5G circuits.”

Polyimide more broadly remains a critical interlayer dielectric in 5G-era advanced packaging, particularly wafer-level fan-out packaging. As reviewed by Shenyang University of Chemical Technology (2023), conventional polyimide’s Dk of 3.0–4.0 and Df of approximately 0.02 are insufficient for next-generation signal integrity, and further reductions require molecular engineering, porosity introduction, or composite formulation. The gap between where conventional PI sits and where 5G mmWave demands it to be defines much of the active research agenda in this field.

Liquid crystal polyesters (LCP) address a different part of the frequency spectrum. Researchers at the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China documented LCP’s outstanding combination of good thermal stability, low water absorption, and stable dielectric constant and loss tangent across millimeter-wave frequency ranges (2020). These properties position LCP as an ideal high-performance substrate and packaging material for both sub-6 GHz and mmWave 5G antenna modules. The stability of LCP’s dielectric properties across frequency — a property many polymer systems lack — is particularly valued for antenna designs that must maintain consistent radiation characteristics.

Cyclo-olefin polymers (COP) are gaining ground for millimeter-wave filter applications. Researchers at UBO/Lab-STICC CNRS demonstrated narrow-band substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) bandpass filters using COP materials with a loss tangent as low as 7.5 × 10⁻⁴ at 40 GHz for Zeon’s RS420-LDS grade, fabricated using a laser direct structuring (LDS) process (2018). This loss tangent value — more than an order of magnitude lower than conventional polyimide — makes COP a compelling candidate for high-Q mmWave front-end components. The LDS fabrication route also enables three-dimensional metallization of complex cavity geometries, pointing toward a miniaturization pathway for mmWave modules. Standards bodies including IEEE have documented the increasing importance of low-loss substrate selection in mmWave circuit design.

Loss tangent (Df) explained

The loss tangent, or dissipation factor (Df), quantifies the fraction of electromagnetic energy converted to heat as a signal propagates through a dielectric material. At millimeter-wave frequencies (above 30 GHz), even a small Df — such as the difference between 0.002 and 0.00075 — translates to measurable insertion loss per centimeter of transmission line, directly degrading link budget and data throughput in 5G and 6G systems.

For prototyping and additive manufacturing contexts, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague evaluated common 3D-printable plastics (PLA, PET-G, ABS, ASA) over the 1–100 MHz frequency range, finding relative permittivities between 2.88 and 3.48 and loss factors from 0.03 to 4.31%. PLA (colorless) and ABS were identified as more suitable for RF applications based on lower loss factor values and frequency dependences (2022). While these values do not approach the performance of LCP or COP at mmWave frequencies, 3D-printable RF substrates represent an accessible prototyping pathway for early-stage hardware development.

Explore the full patent and literature landscape for low-loss dielectric polymer substrates in PatSnap Eureka.

Search Dielectric Materials in PatSnap Eureka →

Nano-composites and ceramics: engineering air into the substrate

Porous nano-composite structures represent the frontier of ultra-low permittivity substrate development specifically targeted at future 6G frequency bands, where the design philosophy of maximising air content — since air possesses the ideal permittivity of 1 — is a recurring theme across both polymer and ceramic composite systems.

Researchers at the University of Oulu fabricated a porous composite of hollow silica nanoshells and cellulose nanofibers using a template-assisted Stöber process, in which polystyrene nanosphere cores were coated with amorphous SiO₂ shells and subsequently burned off to yield hollow spheres. The resulting composite, with a mass density of just 0.19 ± 0.02 g/cm³, was demonstrated as a viable candidate for 6G dielectric substrates (2020). The University of Oulu’s work, published in 2020, represents one of the first published material studies explicitly framed around 6G frequency requirements, predating most comparable work globally. Research on next-generation wireless materials is also tracked by bodies such as ITU, which oversees 6G spectrum and standardisation discussions.

University of Oulu researchers fabricated a porous silica-cellulose nanocomposite with a mass density of 0.19 ± 0.02 g/cm³ using a template-assisted Stöber process, demonstrating it as a viable 6G dielectric substrate candidate in 2020. The approach maximises air content to drive effective permittivity toward the ideal value of 1.

Figure 2 — Loss tangent (Df) values for key low-loss dielectric materials at their characterised frequencies
Loss tangent (Df) comparison for key low-loss dielectric materials for 5G and 6G at characterised frequencies Material Loss Tangent (Df) → 0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 COP (40 GHz) 7.5×10⁻⁴ TmBPPA PI (10⁴ Hz) 3.94×10⁻³ Conv. Polyimide ~0.020 PLA / ABS (1–100 MHz) 0.03–4.31% Note: values measured at different frequencies; direct comparison is indicative only. See cited literature for full measurement conditions.
COP achieves a loss tangent of 7.5 × 10⁻⁴ at 40 GHz — more than 25× lower than conventional polyimide — making it the leading polymer candidate for high-Q mmWave filter applications. Values from cited literature; measurement frequencies differ across materials.

Low-density composite materials combining microwave-transmissive polymer matrices with particulate fillers have also been patented for microwave antenna and lens applications. A 3M Innovative Properties Company patent (2012, JP) disclosed a composite with a dielectric constant tunable between approximately 1.2 and 100 and a microwave loss tangent no greater than 0.10 at 1 GHz, achieved by controlling the volume fraction and coating thickness of electrically conductive filler particles with major dimensions below 0.5 mm. The system allows filler volume fraction to increase while decreasing composite density — an unusual design inversion enabled by the hollow or low-density nature of the filler particles.

Inorganic ceramic composite systems continue to find application in microwave resonator and filter components. Cold-sintered (Bi₀.₉₅Li₀.₀₅)(V₀.₉Mo₀.₁)O₄–Na₂Mo₂O₇ composites were shown to achieve near-zero temperature coefficient of resonant frequency (TCF) with a relative permittivity around 40 and a Microwave Quality Factor (Qf) of approximately 4,000 GHz, as reported by Xi’an Jiaotong University (2019). Critically, cold sintering operates at approximately 150°C — far below the conventional ceramic sintering temperatures of 800–1,200°C — offering a low-energy manufacturing pathway for temperature-stable filter and antenna components in 5G base station infrastructure. Research published through Nature journals has documented cold sintering as one of the most significant ceramic processing innovations of the past decade.

Key finding: cold sintering enables energy-efficient ceramic dielectrics

Cold-sintered (Bi₀.₉₅Li₀.₀₅)(V₀.₉Mo₀.₁)O₄–Na₂Mo₂O₇ composites achieve near-zero temperature coefficient of resonant frequency (TCF), a relative permittivity of ~40, and a Microwave Quality Factor (Qf) of approximately 4,000 GHz — all at a processing temperature of approximately 150°C. This represents a viable low-energy route to temperature-stable microwave resonators for 5G base station filters, as reported by Xi’an Jiaotong University (2019).

Measurement under pressure: characterizing dielectrics at mmWave and THz

Accurate measurement of Dk and Df at high frequencies is both technically challenging and commercially critical — discrepancies between vendor datasheets and actual board-level performance can compromise signal integrity at mmWave frequencies, with direct consequences for link budget and system qualification. The characterization methods landscape has evolved substantially to meet the demands of 5G and 6G material qualification.

Unimicron Technology Corporation employed the Fabry–Perot open resonator (FPOR) technique to characterize three commercially sourced low-loss dielectric materials, cross-validated against a fabricated coplanar waveguide with ground (CPWG) test vehicle measured by time-domain reflectometry (TDR) and vector network analysis (VNA) (2022). The study highlighted significant differences between vendor-provided Dk and Df values and those measured on actual PCB structures using real cross-section geometries. This finding has direct implications for high-frequency PCB design and qualification: engineers cannot rely on datasheet values alone when designing for mmWave performance.

“Vendor-provided Dk and Df values diverge meaningfully from PCB-level measurements — underscoring the necessity of Fabry–Perot open resonator and TDR-based qualification at the substrate fabrication stage.”

For anisotropic materials — including many polymer laminates used in multilayer PCB constructions — resonant cavity methods provide high accuracy but require careful interference mode suppression. Researchers at Northwestern Polytechnical University designed a multi-mode split rectangular cavity operating from 300 to 1,000 MHz to characterize low-loss anisotropic dielectric materials, validating the approach on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (2022). The method addresses the directional dependence of permittivity in laminated structures, which is often overlooked in single-axis characterization approaches.

At terahertz frequencies — directly relevant to 6G systems envisioned to operate above 100 GHz — conventional analytical and iterative numerical methods for complex refractive index extraction from THz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) data suffer from sensitivity to initial conditions and convergence problems. Researchers at Huazhong University of Science and Technology proposed a 4-layer neural network model validated on three materials spanning a wide range of dispersions and thicknesses (TPX, z-cut crystal quartz, and 6H SiC), demonstrating smaller extraction errors than traditional iterative algorithms (2022). This represents a methodological innovation of direct relevance to the material qualification pipeline for 6G hardware development, and reflects a broader trend of machine learning integration into materials characterization documented by bodies such as NIST.

At D-band frequencies (110–170 GHz) specifically planned for B5G and 6G outdoor-to-indoor coverage scenarios, penetration loss through common building and environmental materials becomes a critical system-level constraint. Researchers at Fudan University investigated penetration losses through vegetation, planks, glass, and slate at D-band and found that thick materials present significant blocking challenges, complicating macro-station indoor coverage strategies for future B5G mobile communication (2022). This result establishes a system-level constraint that dielectric substrate designers must account for when engineering low-loss propagation paths and antenna window materials.

Track characterization patents and THz measurement innovations across the 5G and 6G materials pipeline with PatSnap Eureka.

Explore PatSnap Eureka for Materials Intelligence →
Frequently asked questions

Low-loss dielectric materials for 5G and 6G — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a deeper answer →

References

  1. Characterization of Low-Loss Dielectric Materials for High-Speed and High-Frequency Applications — Unimicron Technology Corporation, 2022
  2. A Facile Strategy for Non-fluorinated Intrinsic Low-k and Low-loss Dielectric Polymers: Valid Exploitation of Secondary Relaxation Behaviors — Sun Yat-sen University, 2019
  3. A General Neural Network Model for Complex Refractive Index Extraction of Low-Loss Materials in the Transmission-Mode THz-TDS — Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022
  4. Research on Penetration Loss of D-Band Millimeter Wave for Typical Materials — Fudan University, 2022
  5. Synthesis and applications of low dielectric polyimide — Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, 2023
  6. Progress of liquid crystal polyester (LCP) for 5G application — University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020
  7. Ultra-low permittivity porous silica-cellulose nanocomposite substrates for 6G telecommunication — University of Oulu, 2020
  8. Complex Permittivity Measurement of Low-Loss Anisotropic Dielectric Materials at Hundreds of Megahertz — Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2022
  9. LDS Realization of High-Q SIW Millimeter Wave Filters with Cyclo-Olefin Polymers — UBO/Lab-STICC CNRS, 2018
  10. Temperature Stable Cold Sintered (Bi0.95Li0.05)(V0.9Mo0.1)O4-Na2Mo2O7 Microwave Dielectric Composites — Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2019
  11. Low density dielectric with low microwave loss — 3M Innovative Properties Company, 2012
  12. Evaluation of Relative Permittivity and Loss Factor of 3D Printing Materials for Use in RF Electronic Applications — Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 2022
  13. Low dielectric loss dielectric material for high frequency applications — Kyocera Corporation, 2000
  14. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization (patent filing data and wireless communication technology trends)
  15. IEEE — Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (mmWave circuit design and substrate selection standards)
  16. ITU — International Telecommunication Union (6G spectrum and standardisation)
  17. Nature — cold sintering as a ceramic processing innovation (Nature journals)
  18. NIST — National Institute of Standards and Technology (machine learning in materials characterization)

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo