Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Next-gen flu vaccine pipeline: mRNA, universal antigens

Next-Generation Influenza Vaccine Pipeline — PatSnap Insights
Drug Discovery & Vaccines

Conventional influenza vaccines are constrained by strain-prediction errors and narrow hemagglutinin immunodominance. Three convergent next-generation platforms — mRNA-LNP, universal conserved-antigen, and combination respiratory vaccines — are reshaping the patent landscape, with ModernaTX, BioNTech SE, and University of Pennsylvania among the most active filers.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 10 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Why Conventional Influenza Vaccines Fall Short

Influenza kills up to 650,000 people each year globally, yet the vaccines designed to prevent those deaths are structurally limited in ways that next-generation platforms are now specifically engineered to overcome. The core problem is twofold: conventional egg-based and recombinant vaccines depend on annual strain-prediction that is frequently wrong, and they elicit immunity almost exclusively against the highly variable head domain of hemagglutinin (HA) — the part of the virus that mutates fastest. When prediction fails, or when a pandemic strain emerges that is antigenically novel — as H5N1 and H7N9 have demonstrated — existing vaccines offer little or no protection.

650,000
Influenza deaths annually (global estimate)
1,000×
Dose efficiency gain of mRNA-LNP vs. prior mRNA influenza vaccines (preclinical)
0.05 µg
Single-dose protective threshold per antigen in murine mRNA-LNP models
8
mRNA species in Sanofi’s octavalent influenza vaccine composition

Retrieved patent filings consistently frame this inadequacy as the primary motivation for next-generation development. The molecular targets addressed across the dataset reflect a deliberate pivot away from the HA head: researchers are pursuing the conserved HA stalk (HA2 subdomain), neuraminidase (NA), nucleoprotein (NP), matrix protein 2 ectodomain (M2e), and matrix protein 1 (M1) — antigens that mutate far more slowly and therefore offer the prospect of durable, cross-strain protection. According to WHO, influenza vaccine effectiveness against circulating strains varies widely season to season, underscoring the urgency of strain-independent approaches.

Immunodominance and the HA Head Problem

The HA head domain is the dominant target of the human antibody response to influenza infection and conventional vaccination. Because it mutates rapidly, immunity gained against one season’s strain provides limited protection against the next. Next-generation platforms aim to redirect immunity toward the conserved HA stalk (HA2 subdomain) and other internal proteins that cannot mutate as freely without compromising viral fitness.

The patent dataset surveyed spans filings from 2009 to 2025, with activity concentrated from 2017 onward — coinciding with the maturation of mRNA-LNP technology following foundational nucleoside-modification work. Activity from academic institutions such as University of Pennsylvania and government bodies including the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) runs alongside commercial filings from ModernaTX, Pfizer, Sanofi, BioNTech SE, and CureVac.

Influenza causes up to 650,000 deaths annually worldwide, and ongoing pandemic risk from antigenically novel strains such as H5N1 and H7N9 has made the limitations of conventional strain-matched vaccines a central driver of next-generation influenza vaccine development.

The mRNA-LNP Platform: Dose Efficiency and Breadth Across Subtypes

The mRNA-lipid nanoparticle platform is the single largest modality cluster in the surveyed dataset, encompassing patents from ModernaTX, Pfizer, CureVac AG, BioNTech SE, Sanofi, and GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. The mechanism involves synthetic mRNA encoding influenza antigenic polypeptides, formulated in ionizable lipid nanoparticles to enable intracellular delivery and in vivo antigen expression. The most significant technical signal in the dataset concerns dose efficiency: University of Pennsylvania patent filings describe single-dose protective immunity in murine models at 0.05 µg per antigen — compared with the 1–80 µg doses required by prior conventional mRNA influenza vaccine studies, representing a greater than 1,000-fold improvement.

“Prior influenza virus mRNA vaccine studies required doses of 1–80 µg to achieve protection in mice, while nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP multi-antigen formulations achieved protective immunity at a single dose of 0.05 µg per antigen — a greater than 1,000-fold dose efficiency signal in preclinical models.”

Multiple ModernaTX patents specify N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) and related modified nucleosides as chemical modifications at the 5-position of uracil residues, with claims that 100% uracil substitution is preferred to reduce innate immune activation and enhance translational efficiency. LNP formulations are described with defined molar ratios of cationic lipid, non-cationic lipid, sterol, and PEG-modified lipid. ModernaTX’s broad-spectrum vaccine patents enumerate HA2 stem antigens via specific sequence ID ranges and describe consensus sequences derived from multi-subtype alignments to elicit cross-reactive seroconversion, measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers in preclinical mammalian models.

Figure 1 — Key Influenza Antigens Targeted in Next-Generation Vaccine Patents
Key Influenza Antigens Targeted in Next-Generation Influenza Vaccine Pipeline Patents 0 25 50 75 100 Relative dataset coverage (%) 100% HA (Head/Stalk) 75% HA Stalk (HA2 only) 60% NP (Nucleoprotein) 50% SARS-CoV-2 Spike 45% NA (Neuraminidase) 40% M2e (Ectodomain) 30% M1 (Matrix 1)
Relative frequency of antigen targets across retrieved next-generation influenza vaccine patent filings. HA (head and stalk combined) dominates, followed by conserved internal antigens NP, M2e, and M1 targeted for T cell-mediated cross-strain immunity. SARS-CoV-2 spike appears as a co-target in combination vaccine filings. Values represent relative dataset coverage, not absolute patent counts.

A distinct sub-cluster within the mRNA platform focuses on valency expansion. Sanofi’s 2024 filings claim octavalent influenza vaccine compositions comprising eight mRNA species, each encoding a different influenza antigen, co-formulated in LNPs. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA’s 2025 filing (Australian jurisdiction) describes a quadrivalent nucleic acid composition targeting two influenza A subtypes and two influenza B strains, with claims for immune responses against at least one further HA subtype not encoded in the composition. The University of Georgia Research Foundation’s 2025 filings claim pentavalent and octavalent compositions including HA antigens from H1, H3, and influenza B virus strains combined with NA (N1 and N2) antigens, as virus-like particles or recombinant proteins.

University of Pennsylvania patent filings describe nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP influenza vaccines achieving single-dose protective immunity in murine models at 0.05 µg per antigen — more than 1,000-fold lower than the 1–80 µg doses required by prior conventional mRNA influenza vaccine studies.

Explore the full mRNA influenza vaccine patent landscape with PatSnap Eureka’s AI-powered search.

Search mRNA Influenza Patents in PatSnap Eureka →

Universal Antigen Strategies: Targeting What the Virus Cannot Change

Universal influenza vaccine strategies bypass the annual strain-matching problem by targeting conserved viral proteins that cannot mutate freely without compromising viral fitness. The dataset reveals two parallel tracks: mRNA-encoded multi-antigen platforms and protein or peptide-based conserved antigen approaches, with more recent filing activity concentrated in the mRNA track.

HA Stalk and Chimeric Hemagglutinin Approaches

ModernaTX patents claim mRNA encoding HA2 stem antigens (enumerated via specific sequence ID ranges), citing prior literature demonstrating cross-protective antibodies against the HA stalk. The U.S. Government/NIAID filed patents on ferritin nanoparticles displaying HA trimers, with claims for protection against antigenically divergent strains — a structural biology approach in which the HA stem-only construct self-assembles around ferritin linked via trimerization domains. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai patents describe chimeric HA polypeptides designed to redirect immune responses toward conserved stalk epitopes by presenting sequential immunologically “exotic” head domains that the immune system has not previously encountered, forcing antibody responses toward the invariant stalk scaffold.

NP, M2e, and Multi-Antigen Fusion Proteins

Nucleoprotein (NP) is consistently highlighted as a conserved T cell antigen across multiple assignees. IMAXIO patents describe NP fused to a C4b-binding protein (C4bp) oligomerization domain to increase cellular immunogenicity. Texas Tech University patents claim fusion proteins combining three or more M2e ectodomain sequences from distinct influenza A strains concatenated with HA2 stem regions, demonstrating immunogenicity across strains — and notably, also claiming cross-protection against anthrax simultaneously. Emergent Product Development Gaithersburg patents describe polynucleotides encoding multiple copies of M2e peptides expressed in recombinant Modified Vaccinia Ankara (rMVA).

Key Finding: Protein-Based Universal Antigen IP May Offer Freedom-to-Operate

Retrieved results suggest that mRNA platforms are receiving more recent filing activity in the universal antigen space, while protein-based conserved antigen approaches (ferritin-HA nanoparticles, M2e-HA2 fusions, chimeric HA) have established earlier IP with some inactive statuses — potentially creating freedom-to-operate opportunities for developers pursuing protein or peptide-based universal influenza vaccines.

Computationally Optimized Consensus Antigens

Oregon Health and Science University and University of Pittsburgh patents describe computer-derived consensus HA polypeptides for H1N1, H3N2, H2N2, and influenza B, with claims for synergistic broad neutralization in prime-boost or cocktail regimens. Individual sequences target distinct HA antigenic regions, and the patent claims describe demonstrated synergistic neutralization breadth when administered in combination — a computationally designed approach that is distinct from both chimeric HA and mRNA-encoded stalk strategies. According to NIH, NIAID has supported multiple universal influenza vaccine research programs targeting conserved antigens as part of its strategic plan for pandemic preparedness.

Yeda Research and Development Co. Ltd. patents describe synthetic flagellin-displayed peptide vaccines for intranasal delivery, incorporating B-cell HA epitopes, T-helper HA/NP epitopes, and CTL NP/M epitopes in a single construct — representing a mucosal delivery approach that is absent from the mRNA-LNP cluster.

Figure 2 — Next-Generation Influenza Vaccine Platform Landscape: Modality vs. Development Stage
Next-Generation Influenza Vaccine Pipeline: Modalities Mapped Against Apparent Development Stage Early Preclinical Advanced Preclinical Early Clinical Signal mRNA-LNP (broad-spectrum HA/HA2) Adv Multivalent mRNA (octavalent / pentavalent) Early Chimeric HA / Ferritin nanoparticle Pre NP / M2e / M1 fusion proteins Pre Combination Flu + SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Pre Viral vector (rMVA / NDV) Pre DNA / RNA-encoded monoclonal antibodies Early Circle position indicates apparent development stage based on patent language. No Phase 2/3 clinical data retrieved for any modality.
All modalities in the surveyed dataset appear to be at preclinical or early development stages. mRNA-LNP broad-spectrum platforms are furthest along based on preclinical immunogenicity data cited in patent specifications; no retrieved result describes a completed Phase 2 or Phase 3 clinical trial for any next-generation influenza vaccine candidate.

Texas Tech University patents claim fusion proteins combining three or more M2e ectodomain sequences from distinct influenza A strains concatenated with HA2 stem regions, with claims for immunogenicity across multiple influenza strains. No retrieved result describes a completed Phase 2 or Phase 3 clinical trial for any next-generation influenza vaccine candidate.

Multivalent and Combination Respiratory Vaccine Approaches

The combination respiratory vaccine cluster — co-targeting influenza alongside SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens — is the most geographically distributed filing cluster in the dataset, with Spicona Inc. representing the most active single filer. Combination vaccines co-targeting influenza HA/NA antigens and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are described via multiple modality formats: live attenuated influenza virion plus live viral vector, RNA/DNA vaccine polynucleotides, and recombinant protein combinations.

BioNTech SE’s 2024 WO filing explicitly describes administering a bivalent SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccine together with a tetravalent influenza HA mRNA vaccine to induce combined immunity. ModernaTX’s filings describe multi-mRNA combination vaccines targeting influenza A, influenza B, and up to two coronavirus strains simultaneously in LNP formulations. Instituto Butantan’s 2025 Brazilian filing describes an inactivated Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vector expressing the SARS-CoV-2 stabilized spike protein, combined with trivalent seasonal influenza antigens — produced in the same manufacturing infrastructure as seasonal influenza vaccine, a manufacturing integration strategy notable for emerging-economy contexts. According to WHO, co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines is already practiced clinically, making a co-formulated product a commercially logical next step.

Spicona Inc.’s multi-jurisdictional portfolio spans WO, CA, AU, MX, BR, CO, IL, JP, AR, GB, and US jurisdictions — all relating to the same core invention combining influenza HA/NA antigens with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in various formats. The company’s filings describe annual re-vaccination intervals of 10–14 months, suggesting vaccine schedule modeling, though no clinical data are present in retrieved results. Developers entering this space should monitor Spicona Inc.’s portfolio alongside BioNTech and ModernaTX filings for potential interference or design-around requirements, particularly regarding HA/NA plus spike co-formulation claims.

Map freedom-to-operate risks in the combination influenza + SARS-CoV-2 vaccine patent landscape using PatSnap Eureka.

Analyse Combination Vaccine Patents in PatSnap Eureka →

Beyond the influenza-COVID-19 pairing, ModernaTX’s 2024 JP filing and a 2025 AU filing describe up to four or more mRNA polynucleotides in a single LNP-formulated product, targeting influenza A (multiple strains), influenza B, and coronaviruses simultaneously — a respiratory virus super-combination strategy. The octavalent and higher-valency mRNA influenza vaccines from Sanofi and University of Georgia Research Foundation represent a parallel strategy to achieve broad seasonal coverage plus cross-protective immunity from a single injection without annual strain-matching dependence. The European Medicines Agency has published guidance on combination vaccine development that will be relevant to regulatory strategy for these multi-antigen products.

Spicona Inc. is the most active single filer in the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 combination vaccine patent space, with pending filings across WO, CA, AU, MX, BR, CO, IL, JP, AR, GB, and US jurisdictions — all relating to the same core invention combining influenza HA/NA antigens with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Assignee Landscape, IP Density, and Strategic Implications

Patent-driven commercial innovation in the next-generation influenza vaccine space is heavily concentrated among a small number of US and European mRNA biotechs and large pharma, while academic and government institutions contribute conserved-antigen and structural biology strategies that are licensing-eligible.

Commercial Filers

ModernaTX is the most prolific influenza vaccine filer in the dataset, with patents distributed across WO, US, EP, AU, CA, IN, MX, JP, and BR jurisdictions. Claims span broad-spectrum mRNA-LNP influenza vaccines (HA head, HA2 stem, consensus sequences), seasonal mRNA influenza vaccines, and multi-pathogen respiratory combination vaccines, with filings ranging from 2017 to 2025 — indicating sustained IP expansion over nearly a decade. Competitors entering the mRNA influenza space face a dense IP landscape requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis, as noted in PatSnap’s IP intelligence resources. Pfizer’s 2023 filings in CO and MX cover RNA vaccines encoding hemagglutinin antigens. Sanofi’s 2024 filings in MX and BR claim octavalent mRNA influenza vaccines. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA spans conventional adjuvanted vaccines (2009–2011) and recent nucleic acid-based compositions (2025, AU).

Academic and Government Filers

The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania hold a significant academic patent portfolio for nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP universal influenza vaccines targeting HA, NA, NP, M1, and M2e, filed across WO, US, IN, NZ, AU, and BR, with filings spanning 2021–2024. The U.S. Government (represented by the Secretary of Health and Human Services/NIAID) filed patents on ferritin nanoparticle HA stem vaccines. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is active on chimeric HA approaches (multiple IL and JP jurisdictions, 2015–2023) and nucleoside-modified mRNA universal influenza vaccines. Oregon Health and Science University and University of Pittsburgh contribute computationally optimized HA polypeptide patents covering H1N1, H3N2, H2N2, and influenza B. University of Georgia Research Foundation’s 2025 WO filings claim pentavalent and octavalent influenza immunogens.

Academic and government-affiliated organizations contribute meaningful structural and immunological innovation in conserved-antigen targeting that is licensing-eligible. Commercial developers seeking differentiated universal vaccine antigens may find partnership opportunities within these portfolios. The PatSnap Insights blog covers patent landscape analysis methodology relevant to evaluating these opportunities. Preclinical immunogenicity data cited in University of Pennsylvania patents — single-dose protection at 0.05 µg per antigen — represents a translational signal worth monitoring in forthcoming IND filings, as this dose efficiency may confer cost-of-goods and dose-sparing advantages relevant to pandemic preparedness stockpiling.

“Academic and government-affiliated organizations contribute meaningful structural and immunological innovation in conserved-antigen targeting that is licensing-eligible; commercial developers seeking differentiated universal vaccine antigens may find partnership opportunities within these portfolios.”

ModernaTX is the most prolific influenza vaccine patent filer in the surveyed dataset, with filings distributed across WO, US, EP, AU, CA, IN, MX, JP, and BR jurisdictions spanning 2017 to 2025 — covering broad-spectrum mRNA-LNP influenza vaccines, seasonal mRNA influenza vaccines, and multi-pathogen respiratory combination vaccines.

Frequently asked questions

Next-generation influenza vaccine pipeline — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a Deeper Answer →

References

  1. Broad Spectrum Influenza Virus Vaccine — ModernaTX, Inc., 2018, EP [Patent]
  2. Nucleic Acid Vaccines — ModernaTX, Inc., 2022, ES [Patent]
  3. Universal Influenza Vaccine Using Nucleoside-Modified mRNA — The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 2023, US [Patent]
  4. Universal Influenza Vaccine Using Nucleoside-Modified mRNA — The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 2024, IN [Patent]
  5. Universal Influenza Vaccine Using Nucleoside-Modified mRNA — Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 2023, JP [Patent]
  6. Novel Influenza Hemagglutinin Protein-Based Vaccines — The U.S.A. as Represented by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 2018, EP [Patent]
  7. SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Combination Vaccine — Spicona Inc., 2022, WO [Patent]
  8. SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Combination Vaccine — Spicona Inc., 2023, IL [Patent]
  9. Combination Vaccines Against Coronavirus Infection, Influenza Infection, and/or RSV Infection — BioNTech SE, 2024, WO [Patent]
  10. Respiratory Virus Combination Vaccine — ModernaTX, Inc., 2024, JP [Patent]
  11. Influenza-Coronavirus Combination Vaccine — ModernaTX, Inc., 2024, JP [Patent]
  12. Multivalent Influenza Vaccines — Sanofi, 2024, MX [Patent]
  13. Multivalent Vaccines Against the Influenza Virus — Sanofi, 2024, BR [Patent]
  14. Influenza Virus Vaccines — GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, 2025, AU [Patent]
  15. Pentavalent and Octavalent Influenza Virus Immunogens — University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc., 2025, WO [Patent]
  16. Synergistic Combination Administration of Computer-Optimized Broadly Reactive Antigens Against H1N1 Influenza — Oregon Health and Science University, 2020, JP [Patent]
  17. DNA Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Influenza Virus — Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2024, JP [Patent]
  18. Immunogenic Composition Against COVID-19 and Seasonal Influenza — Instituto Butantan, 2025, BR [Patent]
  19. World Health Organization (WHO) — Influenza (Seasonal) Fact Sheet
  20. National Institutes of Health (NIH) / NIAID — Universal Influenza Vaccine Research Program
  21. European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Guidance on Combination Vaccine Development

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This article is derived from a limited set of patent and literature records retrieved across targeted searches and represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only — it should not be interpreted as a comprehensive view of the full field, clinical pipeline, or regulatory landscape.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo