Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

PI3Kα inhibitors in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer

PI3Kα Inhibitor Pipeline in PIK3CA-Mutant Breast Cancer — PatSnap Insights
Drug Discovery & Oncology

PIK3CA mutations drive constitutive PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling in 30–40% of breast cancers and across multiple gynecological malignancies. The approval of alpelisib validated selective PI3Kα inhibition as a clinical strategy — and a broad pipeline of isoform-selective agents, combination regimens, and biomarker-driven trials has followed.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 10 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Why PIK3CA Is One of Oncology’s Most Actionable Targets

PIK3CA mutations are present in approximately 30–40% of all breast cancer subtypes and in up to 45% of luminal (HR+) disease — making the gene one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in women’s cancers. The gene encodes p110α, the catalytic subunit of class IA phosphoinositide 3-kinase, which phosphorylates PIP2 at the 3-OH position to generate PIP3, thereby activating AKT and downstream effectors including mTOR, p70S6K, and 4E-BP1.

30–40%
PIK3CA mutation prevalence across all breast cancer subtypes
~45%
Prevalence in luminal (HR+) breast cancer specifically
~70%
Breast cancers with PI3K pathway hyperactivation (all mechanisms)
35.1%
PIK3CA-mutant luminal breast cancers with APOBEC3-induced mutations (TCGA-BRCA)

Three hotspot mutations dominate the clinical landscape: H1047R (kinase domain, exon 20), E545K, and E542K (helical domain, exon 9). These gain-of-function mutations confer constitutive PI3K pathway activation independent of upstream growth factor input, driving cell proliferation, survival, migration, and resistance to both endocrine therapy and HER2-targeted agents. Research from the University of São Paulo established that PIK3CA exon 20 mutations — including H1047R — are associated with poor prognosis, while exon 9 mutations may carry a more favorable outlook, underscoring the prognostic heterogeneity within the mutation class.

The mechanistic distinction between mutation classes is clinically relevant: H1047R acts at the membrane-binding interface to constitutively activate PI3K independently of Ras input, while E545K and E542K mutations disrupt an inhibitory interaction between the helical and regulatory domains. Research from the Babraham Institute clarified that p110α — despite lower mRNA expression than p110β in breast epithelial cells — is the dominant mediator of EGF-stimulated PIP3 production and AKT phosphorylation, explaining its non-redundant oncogenic role.

PI3K Pathway Hyperactivation: Beyond PIK3CA Mutations

When all mechanisms are considered — including PTEN loss, PIK3R1 (p85α regulatory subunit) dysregulation, AKT1 mutations, and receptor tyrosine kinase overexpression (notably HER2 amplification) — the PI3K pathway is estimated to be hyperactivated in approximately 70% of breast cancers. This breadth reinforces the pathway’s status as a primary therapeutic target in women’s cancers, according to research published by Monash University.

In gynecological oncology, PI3K pathway hyperactivation through PIK3CA and AKT mutations is particularly prominent in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCCA). PIK3R3 (regulatory subunit 3) has been identified as a potential ovarian cancer biomarker, and PIPKIγ silencing has been shown to suppress ovarian cancer migration and invasion. A 2021 analysis from the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute of nearly 3,000 human breast tumor samples identified a positive linear association between transcriptional PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling scores and stemness scores — but also revealed a “biphasic” relationship between PIK3CA mutant allele dosage and pathway activity, suggesting that high mutant allele burden may paradoxically moderate some signaling outputs.

PIK3CA mutations are present in approximately 30–40% of all breast cancer subtypes and up to 45% of luminal (HR+) breast cancers. The PI3K pathway is estimated to be hyperactivated in approximately 70% of breast cancers when all mechanisms — including PTEN loss, PIK3R1 dysregulation, AKT1 mutations, and RTK overexpression — are considered.

From Pan-PI3K to Isoform-Selective: The Inhibitor Class Landscape

The PI3Kα inhibitor pipeline spans four distinct pharmacological classes — isoform-selective small molecules, pan-Class I inhibitors, dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, and AKT inhibitors — at development stages ranging from approved drugs to preclinical tool compounds. The strategic shift toward isoform selectivity was driven by the toxicity burden of pan-PI3K inhibition, particularly hyperglycemia, neuropsychiatric effects, and immunosuppression.

PI3Kα-Selective Inhibitors: The Approved and Clinical-Stage Agents

Alpelisib (BYL719, Novartis) is the paradigmatic approved agent in this class. Regulatory approval was granted for HR+/HER2-negative PIK3CA-mutant metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant, based on the phase III SOLAR-1 trial. One review from INSERM/Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus describes alpelisib as providing “additional efficacy and a better tox[icity profile]” compared to pan-PI3K inhibitors by virtue of its p110α selectivity. An organoid-based proof-of-concept study from the University of Padua demonstrated that drug sensitivity correlated with specific PIK3CA mutation genotype in multisite metastatic specimens ex vivo — an approach aimed at personalizing treatment selection.

Taselisib (GDC-0032, Roche/Genentech) is a mutant-PI3Kα-selective inhibitor that additionally spares p110β. Multiple patent filings from F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG cover GDC-0032 as a single agent and in combinations, with PIK3CA and PTEN mutation status specified as biomarkers of therapeutic responsiveness. Preclinical data within patent claims include synergy indices (CI < 0.7) for GDC-0032 combined with paclitaxel in PIK3CA H1047R and E545K mutant breast cancer cell lines. Patent claims formally extend to cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers — establishing gynecological malignancy indications in the IP record. The European patent (EP, active, 2019) represents the most commercially significant IP record in this dataset for GDC-0032.

The research tool compound A66 — a p110α isoform-selective inhibitor — combined synergistically with anti-HER2/neu antibody to promote anti-tumor immunity in HER2/neu-positive TUBO mouse breast cancer models, while neither agent alone was effective. This finding, from Inje University, signals an immunomodulatory dimension of isoform-selective PI3Kα blockade that may inform future combination strategies.

Figure 1 — PI3Kα Inhibitor Pipeline: Development Stage by Agent Class
PI3Kα Inhibitor Pipeline Development Stages in PIK3CA-Mutant Breast and Gynecological Cancers Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Approved Alpelisib (BYL719) — PI3Kα-selective ✓ Approved Taselisib (GDC-0032) — mutant-PI3Kα-selective DS-7423 — dual PI3Kα/mTOR Buparlisib (BKM120) — pan-PI3K A66 — PI3Kα tool compound (preclinical) PI3Kα-sel. Mutant-sel. Dual PI3K/mTOR Pan-PI3K Tool cmpd.
Alpelisib is the only approved PI3Kα-selective inhibitor; taselisib (GDC-0032) reached Phase III evaluation; DS-7423 entered Phase I for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma; buparlisib (BKM120) was evaluated in Phase II/III trials across breast cancer subtypes.

Pan-PI3K Inhibitors

Pan-Class I PI3K inhibitors — including buparlisib (BKM120, Novartis), GDC-0941 (pictilisib, Genentech), ZSTK474, and the novel compound DHW-208 (a 4-aminoquinazoline derivative) — inhibit all four p110 isoforms. A 17-model triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) study from Washington University and MD Anderson testing BKM120 demonstrated tumor growth inhibition ranging from 35% to 84%, with variable correlation with PI3K pathway activation markers at baseline — highlighting the challenge of patient selection without precise biomarker stratification.

Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitors

DS-7423 demonstrated antitumor activity with TP53-dependent apoptosis induction in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma cell lines, with potent PI3Kα inhibition (IC50 = 15.6 nM) but substantially weaker activity against PI3Kβ (IC50 = 1,143 nM), conferring a degree of α-preference. It was evaluated in phase I clinical trials for solid tumors, with OCCA-specific preclinical data published by Teikyo University. GDC-0084 (Genentech) was developed as a BBB-penetrant PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with optimized metabolic stability, primarily for glioblastoma, but represents a structural platform relevant to broader PI3K inhibitor design.

Explore the full PI3Kα inhibitor patent landscape and pipeline intelligence in PatSnap Eureka.

Analyse Patents with PatSnap Eureka →

Clinical and Translational Signals Shaping the Pipeline

The PI3Kα inhibitor pipeline is anchored by a set of pivotal clinical trials and translational findings that define both the approved paradigm and the directions for next-generation development. Six distinct clinical and translational signals emerge from the innovation record.

SOLAR-1 (alpelisib + fulvestrant): The phase III randomized trial (NCT02437318) is the pivotal evidence base for alpelisib approval in PIK3CA-mutant HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, referenced across multiple retrieved papers. The Vall d’Hebron/VHIO group has placed this approval in the context of a “worthy 20-year wager” on the PI3K pathway as a therapeutic target in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

SANDPIPER (taselisib): GDC-0032 was evaluated as a β-sparing PI3Ki with clinical activity specifically in PIK3CA-mutant advanced breast cancer. PIK3CA mutation status is confirmed as the predictive biomarker in this trial context, establishing the mutation-stratified design as standard for PI3K inhibitor development.

Alpelisib (BYL719) received regulatory approval for HR+/HER2-negative PIK3CA-mutant metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant, based on the phase III SOLAR-1 trial (NCT02437318). It is the only approved PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and was developed by Novartis.

PIK3CA biomarker testing: A dedicated review from the University of Southern California covers the clinical assay landscape for PIK3CA testing — liquid biopsy versus tissue, ctDNA versus FFPE — referencing multiple platforms used in the alpelisib approval context. Pharmacodynamic biomarker development integrating phospho-AKT, phospho-S6K, FDG-PET/CT, and FGFR1/2 amplification as predictive markers is described in a review from King’s College London, according to research published by Nature-affiliated journals covering oncology biomarker methodology.

APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA mutations as a biomarker stratification layer: A 2023 paper from the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust — the most recent in this dataset — reports that APOBEC3 enzyme-induced mutagenesis accounts for 35.1% of PIK3CA-mutant luminal breast cancers in the TCGA-BRCA cohort. In an independent ER+/HER2-negative cohort treated with PI3K inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors, APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA mutations predicted better clinical outcomes — a potentially important layer for patient selection beyond mutation presence alone.

“APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA mutations account for 35.1% of PIK3CA-mutant luminal breast cancers in the TCGA-BRCA cohort and predicted better clinical outcomes with PI3K inhibitors in an independent ER+/HER2-negative cohort — a potentially important biomarker stratification layer beyond mutation presence alone.”

DS-7423 in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: Phase I clinical trial data for this dual PI3Kα/mTOR inhibitor are referenced alongside OCCA-specific preclinical data demonstrating TP53-dependent apoptosis induction — the only gynecological cancer-specific clinical signal in this dataset. No retrieved results contain data from approved gynecological cancer indications for PI3Kα-selective inhibitors specifically.

Metaplastic breast cancer (PIK3CA E545K): A clinical case report from the University of Cincinnati documents a PIK3CA E545K-mutant metaplastic breast cancer patient treated with bevacizumab + temsirolimus + liposomal doxorubicin, achieving partial remission — representing an early precision oncology application in a rare PIK3CA-mutant subtype.

Figure 2 — PIK3CA Mutation Prevalence Across Breast Cancer Subtypes and PI3K Pathway Hyperactivation
PIK3CA Mutation Prevalence in Breast Cancer Subtypes and PI3K Pathway Hyperactivation Rate 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% ~35% All breast cancer subtypes ~45% Luminal (HR+) breast cancer ~70% PI3K pathway hyperactivated 35.1% APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA (luminal) PIK3CA mutation (all subtypes) PIK3CA mutation (luminal) PI3K pathway hyperactivated APOBEC3 subset
PIK3CA mutations affect ~35% of all breast cancers and ~45% of luminal (HR+) tumours; when all PI3K pathway activation mechanisms are included, ~70% of breast cancers are affected. The APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA mutation subset (35.1% of luminal PIK3CA-mutant cases) is emerging as a distinct biomarker stratum with better PI3K inhibitor outcomes.

Six Combination Strategies Extending PI3Kα Inhibition

PI3Kα inhibitor monotherapy faces intrinsic limitations from pathway feedback loops and co-activated signaling networks. Retrieved results signal at least six active combination strategies, spanning approved paradigms to emerging resistance-informed approaches.

1. PI3Kα Inhibition + Endocrine Therapy (Validated)

Alpelisib combined with fulvestrant is the approved paradigm for PIK3CA-mutant HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The mechanistic rationale is bidirectional: PI3K pathway activation promotes phosphorylation and activation of the estrogen receptor (ER), while ER signaling sustains PI3K activity. Functional antagonism between the two pathways limits monotherapy efficacy, establishing the combination as pharmacologically necessary.

2. PI3Kα Inhibition + CDK4/6 Inhibitors

A Roche patent family explicitly claims combinations of GDC-0032 with CDK4/6 inhibitors for cancer treatment, citing the high frequency of PIK3CA mutations in HR+ breast cancer (~35–40%) and the convergence of CDK4/6 and PI3K pathways on cell cycle regulation. This combination is positioned to address the overlapping biology between the two most frequently targeted pathways in HR+ breast cancer.

3. PI3K Inhibition + PARP Inhibition (Ovarian and Breast Cancer)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute data demonstrate that combined PI3K (BKM120) and PARP inhibitor (olaparib) treatment synergized to suppress proliferation and invasion in PIK3CA-mutant ovarian cancer cell lines — SKOV3, HEYA8, and IGROV1 — via exacerbated DNA damage response and reduced BRCA1/2 expression upon combination treatment. This mechanistically novel synthetic lethality approach, as documented in research consistent with standards from NIH-funded oncology programs, is particularly relevant to gynecological oncology where PARP inhibitors are already established.

4. PI3Kα Inhibition + Anti-HER2 Agents

PIK3CA mutations are present in approximately 30% of early-stage HER2+ breast tumors and are drivers of resistance to trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted agents. Roche patent claims for GDC-0032 explicitly include combinations with pertuzumab, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), and trastuzumab — formally establishing these combinations in the IP record.

Key finding: AURKA as a resistance-informed combination target

A 2018 UCSF chemoproteomics study identified maintenance of Aurora kinase A (AURKA) as a primary kinome rewiring event driving resistance to PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer. Combinations of PI3K inhibitors with the AURKA inhibitor MLN8237 were described as “highly synergistic and durably suppressed mTOR signaling,” causing tumor regression in vivo — representing a resistance-informed combination strategy with in vivo validation.

5. PI3Kα Inhibition + AURKA Inhibition

The UCSF chemoproteomics study established kinome rewiring — specifically AURKA maintenance — as a primary resistance mechanism to PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer. The combination with MLN8237 (alisertib) was highly synergistic and durably suppressed mTOR signaling, causing tumor regression in vivo. This finding positions AURKA inhibitors as rational second-line partners for patients progressing on PI3Kα inhibitor monotherapy, consistent with pathway analysis frameworks endorsed by WIPO-tracked innovation clusters in oncology kinase inhibition.

6. PI3Kα Inhibition + MLL Methyltransferase Inhibition

A 2022 study from Emory University’s Winship Cancer Institute demonstrates that inhibition of MLL1 (KMT2A, H3K4 methyltransferase) in combination with alpelisib impairs HR+ breast cancer growth through disruption of chromatin-based mechanisms by which PI3K sustains ER signaling and cancer development. This epigenome-targeted approach represents an emerging direction for overcoming alpelisib resistance through chromatin remodeling.

Map the full combination patent landscape for PI3Kα inhibitors across breast and gynecological cancers.

Explore Full Patent Data in PatSnap Eureka →

Resistance Mechanisms and How the Field Is Responding

Acquired and intrinsic resistance to PI3Kα inhibitors represents the central challenge limiting durable clinical benefit. Retrieved results document at least four mechanistically distinct resistance nodes, each with translational implications for second-generation inhibitor design and combination strategies.

PIK3CA amplification: Genentech’s oncology biomarker team reported that acquired high-level amplification of the mutant PIK3CA allele drives resistance to GDC-0941 in HER2+/PIK3CA-mutant KPL-4 breast cancer cells, enabling PI3K signaling to overcome drug concentrations reached clinically. This finding has direct implications for second-generation PI3Kα inhibitor design — agents that retain potency against amplified mutant alleles.

Kinome rewiring via AURKA: The UCSF chemoproteomics study identified AURKA maintenance as a primary kinome rewiring event. Combinations with MLN8237 were highly synergistic in vivo, establishing AURKA as a rational co-target for patients progressing on PI3K inhibitors.

XPO1 as a synthetic lethal target: Research from the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica (Chinese Academy of Sciences) reports that blocking exportin 1 (XPO1) overcomes resistance to PI3Kα inhibition in breast cancer — identifying a novel synthetic lethal interaction relevant to acquired resistance management. This finding connects nuclear export biology to PI3K resistance in a mechanistically unexpected direction.

Co-activated signaling pathways: Research from Erasmus MC documents increased MAPK1/3 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation specifically in PIK3CA-hotspot-mutated luminal breast cancers — a finding not predicted by PI3K pathway activation models and associated with worse metastasis-free survival. A Johns Hopkins University mouse model study demonstrated that STAT3, β-catenin, and IGF-1R pathways are co-activated in PIK3CA-H1047R and E545K mutant mammary tumors, and that their inhibition sensitizes tumors to PI3K inhibitors — supporting the rationale for co-targeting MAPK/ERK and STAT3 alongside PI3Kα, consistent with pathway co-targeting frameworks tracked by EPO patent classification systems for oncology combination therapies.

Acquired high-level amplification of the mutant PIK3CA allele drives resistance to PI3K inhibitors in HER2+/PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer cells by enabling PI3K signaling to overcome clinically achievable drug concentrations, as reported by Genentech’s oncology biomarker team. Blocking exportin 1 (XPO1) and inhibiting Aurora kinase A (AURKA) have each been identified as strategies to overcome PI3Kα inhibitor resistance in breast cancer.

PTEN loss as a co-biomarker: PTEN loss amplifies PI3K pathway signaling by eliminating the primary negative regulator (PIP3 phosphatase) and is frequently cited as the most common co-alteration with PIK3CA mutations. Roche patent claims for GDC-0032 specifically include PTEN mutation status as a co-biomarker for therapeutic responsiveness, positioning PTEN alongside PIK3CA as an actionable indicator for patient selection.

Assignee and Author Landscape: Who Is Building This Pipeline

Innovation activity in this dataset is predominantly literature-driven — dominated by academic medical centers — with a focused patent portfolio concentrated at a single large pharmaceutical assignee, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (Roche/Genentech).

Patent Portfolio: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG

Roche/Genentech is the only pharmaceutical assignee with multiple active patent filings in this dataset specifically covering PI3Kα-selective inhibition (GDC-0032/taselisib) in PIK3CA-mutant cancer. Jurisdictions span EP (active, 2019), IL, and SG. The European patent (active) is the most commercially significant IP record in this dataset. Roche also contributes multiple academic papers covering GDC-0941 resistance mechanisms and GDC-0084 discovery chemistry through Genentech-affiliated researchers.

Novartis Pharma AG appears as an academic paper author via affiliated clinical researchers, describing both alpelisib (BYL719) and buparlisib (BKM120), with emphasis on clinical trial design strategy and biomarker stratification approaches for PI3K inhibitors.

Academic Medical Center Contributions

The academic landscape spans institutions across North America, Europe, and Asia:

  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine — PIK3CA-mutant transgenic mouse models, STAT3/IGF-1R combination strategies
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute / Harvard Medical School — PIK3CA resistance mechanisms, PARP + PI3K combination in ovarian cancer
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center — large-scale PIK3CA mutation survival analysis (n = 2,587), P-REX1 feedback loop biology
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust — APOBEC3 PIK3CA mutation biomarker stratification (2023, most recent in dataset)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan — taselisib/ipatasertib combination with chemotherapy
  • UCSF — AURKA kinome rewiring and resistance-informed combination strategies
  • Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences — XPO1 synthetic lethality in PI3Kα resistance
  • Emory University Winship Cancer Institute — MLL methyltransferase and epigenome-targeted alpelisib combinations

Karus Therapeutics Ltd. (UK) appears as both an academic author and industry contributor, with papers on class I/IV PI3K inhibitor discovery and PIK3CB functional characterization — representing an emerging isoform-selective strategy distinct from p110α.

F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG holds the most commercially significant PI3Kα inhibitor patent portfolio in this dataset, covering GDC-0032 (taselisib) across breast, cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer indications, with an active European patent (EP, 2019) and additional filings in Singapore and Israel. Roche patent claims include PIK3CA and PTEN mutation status as co-biomarkers for therapeutic responsiveness.

Frequently asked questions

PI3Kα inhibitor pipeline in PIK3CA-mutant cancers — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a Deeper Answer →

References

  1. PIK3CA exon 20 mutations are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients — University of São Paulo, 2012
  2. PTEN and Other PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Lipid Phosphatases in Breast Cancer — Monash University, 2020
  3. PIK3R3, a regulatory subunit of PI3K, modulates ovarian cancer stem cells and ovarian cancer development and progression — Pusan National University, 2022
  4. Efficacy of PI3K inhibitors in advanced breast cancer — INSERM/Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 2019
  5. A PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer metastatic patient-derived organoid approach to evaluate alpelisib treatment — University of Padua, 2022
  6. Mutant selectivity and combinations of a phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor compound and chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer (EP, active) — F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, 2019
  7. A PI3K p110α-selective inhibitor enhances the efficacy of anti-HER2/neu antibody therapy against breast cancer in mice — Inje University, 2018
  8. Proteomic Resistance Biomarkers for PI3K Inhibitor in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models — Washington University/MD Anderson, 2020
  9. Antitumor Activity and Induction of TP53-Dependent Apoptosis toward Ovarian Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma by the Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor DS-7423 — Teikyo University, 2014
  10. Discovery of Clinical Development Candidate GDC-0084, a Brain Penetrant Inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR — Genentech, 2016
  11. PI3Kα/AKT axis blockade with taselisib or ipatasertib enhances the efficacy of anti-microtubule drugs in human breast cancer cells — European Institute of Oncology, 2017
  12. Signaling via Class IA Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases (PI3K) in Human, Breast-Derived Cell Lines — The Babraham Institute, 2013
  13. Positive correlation between transcriptomic stemness and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling scores in breast cancer — Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, 2021
  14. APOBEC3-induced PIK3CA mutations predict better clinical outcomes with PI3K inhibitors in patients with PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer — Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 2023
  15. Increased MAPK1/3 Phosphorylation in Luminal Breast Cancer Related with PIK3CA Hotspot Mutations and Prognosis — Erasmus MC, 2017
  16. Inhibitors of STAT3, β-catenin, and IGF-1R sensitize mouse PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer to PI3K inhibitors — Johns Hopkins University, 2017
  17. Unbiased screening reveals that blocking exportin 1 overcomes resistance to PI3Kα inhibition in breast cancer — Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica/Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019
  18. Acquired PIK3CA amplification causes resistance to selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors in breast cancer — Genentech, 2013
  19. Effective use of PI3K inhibitor BKM120 and PARP inhibitor Olaparib to treat PIK3CA mutant ovarian cancer — Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 2016
  20. Kinome rewiring reveals AURKA limits PI3K-pathway inhibitor efficacy in breast cancer — UCSF, 2018
  21. Targeting PI3KCA pathway to improve patient outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer — Vall d’Hebron/VHIO, 2019
  22. Biomarkers of response and resistance to PI3K inhibitors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer — Academic Trials Promoting Team, 2019
  23. Testing considerations for PIK3CA as an emerging biomarker in advanced breast cancer — University of Southern California/Keck School of Medicine, 2020
  24. Pharmacodynamic Biomarker Development for PI3K Pathway Therapeutics — King’s College London, 2015
  25. Combined Antiangiogenic and mTOR Inhibitor Targeted Therapy in Metaplastic Breast Cancer Harboring a PIK3CA Mutation — University of Cincinnati, 2014
  26. PI3K inhibitors as new cancer therapeutics: implications for clinical trial design — Novartis Pharma AG, 2016
  27. Combinations of a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor compound and a CDK4/6 inhibitor compound for the treatment of cancer — F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, 2017 (IL Patent)
  28. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization (patent classification and oncology innovation tracking)
  29. EPO — European Patent Office (oncology combination therapy patent classification)
  30. NIH — National Institutes of Health (PI3K pathway oncology research funding and clinical trial registry)
  31. PatSnap Life Sciences Innovation Intelligence Platform

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap‘s proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This report is derived from a targeted set of patent and literature records and represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only; it should not be interpreted as a comprehensive view of the full field, clinical pipeline, or regulatory landscape.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

PatSnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo