Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Thermally conductive polymer composites for power electronics

Thermally Conductive Electrically Insulating Polymer Composites — PatSnap Insights
Materials Science

Engineering polymer composites that simultaneously conduct heat and block electricity is one of the central materials challenges in modern power electronics packaging — requiring precise control of filler chemistry, spatial architecture, percolation behaviour, and dielectric integrity across a wide temperature range.

PatSnap Insights Team Innovation Intelligence Analysts 10 min read
Share
Reviewed by the PatSnap Insights editorial team ·

Filler Selection: Matching Thermal and Electrical Properties

The choice of thermally conductive filler fundamentally determines a composite's performance ceiling — and no single filler dominates every application. Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) is considered the gold standard for power electronics packaging: it delivers in-plane thermal conductivity of 200–400 W/m·K, a wide band gap of approximately 6.2 eV, electrical resistivity greater than 10¹³ Ω·cm, and chemical compatibility with most polymer matrices, with typical loadings of 40–70 vol%. According to research published on ScienceDirect, boron nitride-based composites continue to lead the field for combined thermal and dielectric performance.

400 W/m·K
h-BN in-plane thermal conductivity (max)
>10¹³ Ω·cm
h-BN volume resistivity
2200 W/m·K
Diamond particle thermal conductivity (max)
>15 kV/mm
Breakdown voltage achievable with core-shell fillers at 60 vol%

Beyond h-BN, aluminum nitride (AlN) offers thermal conductivity of 140–180 W/m·K and excellent electrical insulation, making it particularly compatible with polyamide matrices at loadings of 30–60 vol%. Silicon nitride (Si₃N₄) provides 80–150 W/m·K at lower cost with strong mechanical properties. Alumina (Al₂O₃) at 25–35 W/m·K is the most cost-effective and widely deployed option, typically loaded at 40–70 vol%. At the high-performance frontier, diamond particles achieve 1000–2200 W/m·K and are emerging for demanding applications at loadings of 10–30 vol%.

Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) has in-plane thermal conductivity of 200–400 W/m·K, a band gap of approximately 6.2 eV, and electrical resistivity greater than 10¹³ Ω·cm, making it the most widely used filler for thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites in power electronics packaging.

A counter-intuitive finding from the patent literature is that adding thermally insulative fillers — such as talc (platelet, D₅₀ ~15 μm), CaCO₃ (spherical, D₅₀ ~2–3 μm), or mica — alongside conductive fillers can enhance overall thermal conductivity while preserving electrical insulation. Combining 30–35 vol% thermally insulative filler with 10–15 vol% thermally conductive filler (such as graphite or BN) can achieve thermal conductivity greater than 1.5 W/m·K while maintaining volume resistivity greater than 10⁷ Ω·cm — superior to using either filler alone at equivalent total loading.

Figure 1 — Thermal Conductivity vs. Electrical Resistivity: Key Filler Types for Thermally Conductive Electrically Insulating Polymer Composites
Thermal conductivity of key electrically insulating fillers for power electronics polymer composites: h-BN, AlN, Si₃N₄, Al₂O₃, Diamond 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) ~300 h-BN (200–400) ~160 AlN (140–180) ~115 Si₃N₄ (80–150) ~30 Al₂O₃ (25–35) ~1600 Diamond (1000–2200) h-BN AlN Si₃N₄ Al₂O₃ Diamond All fillers are electrically insulating
Midpoint thermal conductivity values shown; diamond particles (1000–2200 W/m·K) dramatically outperform ceramic fillers, though h-BN remains the most widely deployed filler for combined thermal and dielectric performance in power electronics composites.

Hybrid Filler Architectures That Decouple Heat and Electricity

Hybrid filler architectures solve the core conflict of thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites by physically separating the thermal conduction path from the electrical conduction path. The most effective approach is the core-shell structure: a thermally conductive core — such as copper nanowires, silver particles, or graphite flakes — is encapsulated with a 10–50 nm insulating shell of SiO₂, Al₂O₃, or polydopamine. Thermal percolation occurs through the metallic cores, while the shell prevents electron transport between adjacent fillers. This approach achieves thermal conductivity of 2–5 W/m·K with volume resistivity greater than 10¹¹ Ω·cm.

Architecture B: Triple-Layer Core-Shell (2024–2025 Innovation)

A thermally conductive base particle (AlN or BN) is first coated with a thin metallic layer (Ag or Cu) to enhance inter-particle thermal bridging, then over-coated with an outer insulating layer to prevent electrical percolation. Target specifications: breakdown voltage ≥1 kV/mm, thermal conductivity 3–8 W/m·K.

A more advanced strategy uses immiscible polymer blends to create a sea-island phase separation architecture. In one implementation, a Nylon 66 or PPS "sea" phase is loaded with BN at 60–80 vol% within that phase to form a thermally conductive but electrically insulating continuous matrix, while a PPS or Nylon 66 "island" phase contains expanded graphite at 40–60 vol% within isolated domains that never form a connected electrical pathway. Sequential compounding at controlled mixing speeds of 30–50 rpm preserves the phase morphology. The results dramatically outperform simple blends of the same components: through-plane thermal conductivity of 2.7–3.6 W/m·K, in-plane thermal conductivity of 14.9–15.2 W/m·K, and volume resistivity of 10¹²–10¹³ Ω·cm, compared to volume resistivity below 1000 Ω·cm for unstructured blends.

Sea-island phase separation architectures in immiscible polymer blends achieve in-plane thermal conductivity of 14.9–15.2 W/m·K and volume resistivity of 10¹²–10¹³ Ω·cm in thermally conductive electrically insulating composites — dramatically outperforming simple blends of the same components, which show resistivity below 1000 Ω·cm.

A third architectural approach applies electric or magnetic fields during curing to align platelet fillers — BN, graphite, or mica — perpendicular to the substrate. This field-structured multilayered platelet alignment creates through-thickness thermal pathways that maximise heat flow from chip to heat sink, while in-plane electrical barriers prevent lateral conduction. Field-assisted alignment delivers a 3–5× improvement in through-plane thermal conductivity compared to random orientation.

"Sea-island phase separation achieves volume resistivity of 10¹²–10¹³ Ω·cm — compared to below 1000 Ω·cm for unstructured blends of the same components — demonstrating that spatial architecture matters as much as filler chemistry."

Explore the full patent landscape for hybrid filler architectures in power electronics packaging.

Search Patents in PatSnap Eureka →

Controlling the Percolation Threshold: The Critical Engineering Window

The central engineering challenge in thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites is maintaining filler loading in a narrow window where thermal percolation has occurred but electrical percolation has not. The thermal percolation threshold (φ_t) is approximately 10–25 vol% for platelet fillers and 15–35 vol% for spherical fillers. The electrical percolation threshold (φ_e) for conductive fillers ranges from 15–40 vol% depending on aspect ratio. The design rule is to keep total filler loading in the window where φ_t < φ_filler < φ_e.

Figure 2 — Percolation Threshold Reduction Strategies for Thermally Conductive Polymer Composites
Percolation threshold reduction strategies for thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites: high aspect ratio fillers, bimodal size distribution, surface functionalization, cellulose scaffolds 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% Threshold Reduction (%) ~50% High Aspect Ratio Fillers 30–50% Bimodal Size Distribution 40–60% Surface Functionalization 20–40% Cellulose Scaffolds Surface functionalization values reflect thermal conductivity improvement at equivalent loading
High-aspect-ratio fillers (BN nanosheets, aspect ratio 100–1000) and surface functionalization with silane coupling agents or hyperbranched polymers each deliver 40–60% improvement in effective thermal conductivity at equivalent loading, enabling operation well below the electrical percolation threshold.

Four Strategies to Decouple Thermal and Electrical Percolation

Using BN nanosheets with aspect ratio of 100–1000, or AlN whiskers with aspect ratio of 20–50, dramatically reduces the thermal percolation threshold to 5–15 vol% while the electrical percolation threshold remains high because these fillers are intrinsically insulating. The processing challenge is preventing agglomeration of high-aspect-ratio particles during compounding, as noted by researchers publishing in Nature-affiliated journals.

Bimodal or trimodal filler size distributions combine large particles (10–100 μm) for primary thermal pathways, small particles (0.1–1 μm) for gap-filling and bridging contacts, and nano-fillers (10–100 nm) to enhance polymer-filler interfacial thermal conductance. This approach reduces the thermal percolation threshold by 30–50% compared to monomodal distributions.

Surface functionalization of boron nitride with silane coupling agents or hyperbranched polymers improves thermal conductivity by 40–60% at equivalent filler loading in polymer composites for power electronics, by reducing interfacial thermal resistance (Kapitza resistance) and improving filler dispersion.

Surface functionalization with silane coupling agents — aminosilanes and epoxysilanes — improves filler-polymer adhesion and reduces interfacial thermal resistance (Kapitza resistance), delivering a 40–60% improvement in thermal conductivity at equivalent loading. Hyperbranched polymers applied to BN surfaces further enhance dispersion and reduce phonon scattering at interfaces. A 2024 innovation uses cellulose nanostructures as templates to pre-organise thermally conductive fillers before polymer infiltration, creating continuous thermal pathways at loadings 20–40% below conventional percolation thresholds — an approach particularly effective for battery thermal management in electric vehicles.

Breakdown Voltage Retention Strategies at High Filler Loading

Maintaining breakdown voltage above 10 kV/mm — a typical requirement for power electronics — becomes progressively harder as filler loading increases. Four degradation mechanisms drive premature failure: filler agglomeration creating local field concentration; filler-polymer interfacial voids acting as partial discharge sites; conductive filler bridging forming direct electrical pathways; and moisture absorption reducing dielectric strength. Each requires a specific engineering countermeasure.

Key finding

Coating thermally conductive fillers with 10–50 nm dielectric shells (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, or BN) maintains breakdown voltage greater than 15 kV/mm even at 60 vol% filler loading — because even if fillers approach electrical percolation, the insulating shells prevent electron transport between adjacent particles.

The multilayered composite architecture offers a complementary approach: alternating layers of BN-rich high-thermal-conductivity composite and pure or lightly filled high-dielectric-strength polymer, with 5–20 layers each 10–100 μm thick. Breakdown must propagate through multiple high-resistivity layers, increasing effective breakdown voltage by 2–3× at the cost of a 15–25% reduction in overall thermal conductivity. Alumina decoration on graphene nanoplatelets — depositing 5–20 nm Al₂O₃ before composite incorporation — and polydopamine coating on copper nanowires (20–40 nm conformal coating) each achieve thermal conductivity of 2–4 W/m·K with volume resistivity greater than 10¹¹ Ω·cm and breakdown voltage greater than 12 kV/mm.

Matrix selection is itself a breakdown voltage retention strategy. High dielectric strength polymers — polyimide (PI), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), liquid crystal polymer (LCP), and PEEK — have intrinsic breakdown voltages of 20–30 kV/mm, providing margin for filler-induced degradation. PPS and PEEK are particularly suited to high-temperature power electronics, operating continuously up to 200–250°C. Standards bodies including IEC specify dielectric testing protocols that apply directly to these material systems.

Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) and PEEK polymer matrices have intrinsic breakdown voltages of 20–30 kV/mm and can operate continuously at 200–250°C, making them the preferred matrix materials for high-temperature power electronics packaging composites with thermally conductive fillers.

Analyse breakdown voltage retention patents and academic literature with PatSnap Eureka's AI-powered search.

Explore Literature in PatSnap Eureka →

Practical Formulation Guidelines and Emerging Trends

A recommended formulation for power electronics packaging combines a PPS, PEEK, or high-performance epoxy matrix with h-BN platelets (D₅₀ 10–20 μm) at 40–60 vol% as the primary filler, AlN particles (D₅₀ 1–3 μm) at 5–10 vol% as secondary filler, nano-BN or nano-Al₂O₃ at 2–5 vol% as tertiary filler, and a silane coupling agent at 0.5–2 wt% based on filler weight. This system is expected to deliver through-plane thermal conductivity of 3–8 W/m·K, volume resistivity greater than 10¹¹ Ω·cm, breakdown voltage greater than 10 kV/mm, dielectric constant of 3–6 at 1 MHz, and continuous operating temperature up to 200°C.

Processing parameters are as critical as formulation. Twin-screw extrusion at 260–290°C and 50–80 rpm ensures filler dispersion without damaging high-aspect-ratio particles. Compression moulding at 100–200 bar maximises filler packing density. Optional thermal annealing at 150–200°C for 2–4 hours relieves residual stresses and improves filler-matrix interfacial adhesion.

Emerging Trends: 2024–2025

Several developments are pushing the performance boundary. Electrostatically engineered interfaces use charged polymer modifiers to create organised filler networks at lower loadings. Additive manufacturing enables 3D-printed composites with programmed filler orientation that cannot be achieved through conventional compounding. CVD diamond particles of 0.5–5 μm are achieving thermal conductivity greater than 10 W/m·K at 20–30 vol% loading in artificial diamond filler composites. Polybenzazole matrices — new high-performance polymers studied by researchers publishing in ACS Nano — exhibit intrinsic thermal conductivity 2–3× higher than conventional polymer matrices, reducing the burden on filler loading to achieve target composite thermal conductivity.

Figure 3 — Design Decision Framework: Filler System vs. Application Requirement for Thermally Conductive Electrically Insulating Polymer Composites
Design decision framework for thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites: moderate, high, and ultra-high performance tiers Moderate TC 1–3 W/m·K Cost-sensitive applications BN/Talc hybrid Matrix: HDPE/PP Loading: 45–60 vol% Breakdown: >10 kV/mm Resistivity: >10⁷ Ω·cm High TC 3–8 W/m·K Standard breakdown >10 kV/mm BN/AlN bimodal Matrix: PPS/PEEK Loading: 50–70 vol% Breakdown: >10 kV/mm Op. temp: up to 200°C Ultra-High TC >8 W/m·K Extreme breakdown >15 kV/mm Core-shell or diamond Matrix: PI/LCP Loading: 10–30 vol% Breakdown: >15 kV/mm Op. temp: up to 250°C Performance tiers based on patent and academic literature analysis; TC = thermal conductivity
The three-tier design framework maps application requirements to filler system, matrix, and processing choices. Moving from moderate to ultra-high thermal conductivity requires progressively more complex filler architectures and higher-performance polymer matrices.

The WIPO patent database reflects accelerating activity in this space, with filings on core-shell composite fillers, cellulose scaffold-assisted percolation control, and artificial diamond composites all appearing in the 2024–2025 period. The key to success across all performance tiers lies in simultaneously engineering four independent variables: filler intrinsic properties, filler spatial distribution, filler-matrix interface, and matrix selection — all while maintaining the critical balance between thermal percolation and electrical insulation.

Frequently asked questions

Thermally conductive electrically insulating polymer composites — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka for a Deeper Answer →

References

  1. Thermally conductive composite material comprising artificial diamond filler and manufacturing method therefor — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  2. Thermally conductive and electrically insulative polymer compositions containing a thermally insulative filler and uses thereof — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  3. Thermally conductive filler, thermally-conductive composite material, wire harness, and method for manufacturing thermally conductive filler — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  4. Composite filler and method for producing same — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  5. Composite filler and method for producing same — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  6. Composition for electrically insulating polymer-inorganic hybrid material with high thermal conductivity — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  7. Thermally conductive thermoplastic composite with reduced percolation threshold — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  8. Thermally conductive electrically insulating thermoplastic materials — PatSnap Eureka Patent
  9. Highly Thermally Conductive Yet Electrically Insulating Polymer/Boron Nitride Nanosheets Nanocomposite Films for Improved Thermal Management Capability — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  10. Research advances in preparation, mechanism and application of thermally conductive and electrically insulating polymer composites in thermal management materials: A review — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  11. Highly thermal conductive and electrically insulating polymer composites based on polydopamine-coated copper nanowire — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  12. High-performance epoxy resin/silica coated flake graphite composites for thermal conductivity and electrical insulation — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  13. Field-structured, multilayered platelets enable high performance, dielectric thermal composites — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  14. Significantly Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of hBN/PTFE Composites: A Comprehensive Study of Filler Size and Dispersion — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  15. Thermal conductivity and dielectric properties of epoxy composites with hyperbranched polymer modified boron nitride nanoplatelets — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  16. Thermal percolation and electrical insulation in composite materials with partially metallic coated fillers — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  17. Endowing the high efficiency thermally conductive and electrically insulating composites with excellent antistatic property through selectively multilayered distribution of diverse functional fillers — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  18. Decoration of defect-free graphene nanoplatelets with alumina for thermally conductive and electrically insulating epoxy composites — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  19. Power electronics thermal solutions using thermally conductive polyimide films — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  20. Design of an experimental study of high through-plane thermal conductivity hybrid epoxy composite insulation with superior dielectric strength — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  21. Eco-friendly and scalable strategy to design electrically insulating boron nitride/polymer composites with high through-plane thermal conductivity — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  22. Thermally Conductive Electrically Insulating Polymer Nanocomposites — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  23. Recent progress on thermal conductive and electrical insulating polymer composites — PatSnap Eureka Literature
  24. Review of boron nitride based polymer composites with ultrahigh thermal conductivity — ScienceDirect / Composites Part A
  25. Electrostatically engineered thermal interface materials — Springer Nature / Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials
  26. Thermally Conductive but Electrically Insulating Polybenzazole — ACS Nano
  27. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization: Global Patent Database
  28. IEC — International Electrotechnical Commission: Dielectric Testing Standards
  29. PatSnap Materials Science Intelligence Platform — PatSnap.com

All data and statistics in this article are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Your Agentic AI Partner
for Smarter Innovation

Patsnap fuses the world’s largest proprietary innovation dataset with cutting-edge AI to
supercharge R&D, IP strategy, materials science, and drug discovery.

Book a demo