Aborder Products vs. dbest Products: Stackable Cart Patent Dispute Ends in Mutual Dismissal
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Aborder Products, Inc. v. dbest products, Inc. |
| Case Number | 2:24-cv-10961 (C.D. Cal.) |
| Court | Central District of California |
| Duration | Dec 2024 – Sep 2025 265 days |
| Outcome | Mutual Dismissal – No Damages Disclosed |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Stackable Collapsible Carts |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Company competing in the consumer goods sector, specifically within the stackable collapsible cart and utility cart market.
🛡️ Defendant
Global company competing in the consumer goods sector, specifically within the stackable collapsible cart and utility cart market.
Patents at Issue
This dispute centered on **U.S. Patent No. 12103576B2** (Application No. US18/542495), which protects innovations related to stackable collapsible cart design and functionality.
- • US 12103576B2 — Stackable collapsible cart design and functionality
Developing a similar product?
Check if your stackable cart design might infringe this or related patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
On **September 10, 2025**, both parties filed a **Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice**, which the court approved and ordered the following day. Each party to bear its own **attorneys’ fees and costs**. No damages award, injunctive relief, or licensing terms were disclosed in the public record.
Key Legal Issues
The case was initiated as a standard **patent infringement action**. The filing of a consolidated counter-suit by dbest products suggested the defendant may have pursued its own IP or commercial claims, potentially including invalidity counterclaims or competing patent assertions. This bilateral litigation posture often makes negotiated resolution the most commercially rational outcome.
The **dismissal with prejudice** is legally significant: neither party can re-litigate these same claims in federal court, foreclosing future assertion of the same patent against the same defendant on the same accused products, making the resolution final and binding.
Drafting a utility patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with PatSnap Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, PatSnap Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in stackable collapsible cart design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- Monitor US 12103576B2 and related applications
- See competitive activity in stackable cart design
- Understand litigation tactics in this product space
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Stackable collapsible cart designs
1 Patent at Issue
US 12103576B2
Proactive FTO Essential
Before product launch
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Dismissal with prejudice and mutual cost-bearing typically signal confidential settlement — structure discovery and motion practice to preserve settlement leverage.
Search related case law →Counter-suit consolidation is an effective defense tactic that materially increases plaintiff’s risk calculus.
Explore precedents →For R&D Teams
Commission FTO analyses that cover structural utility patents before commercializing stackable or collapsible cart designs.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Patent claims in this product category cover functional and structural features that may not be apparent from visual inspection alone.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.