Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Acqis v. Fujitsu | Patent Lawsuit 1:23-cv-01562

Acqis, LLC v. Fujitsu, Ltd.

1:23-cv-01562 W.D. Tex. Closed 10 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 22 Dec 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 22 Dec 2023, with 10 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case terminated.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
1:23-cv-01562
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
22 Dec 2023 – 22 Dec 2023
Duration
None recorded
Basis of termination
Case Terminated
Products & marks
ESPRIMO desktop computers · Lifebook laptop and tablet computer products · PRIMERGY CX non-blade servers · PRIMERGY MX non-blade servers · PRIMERGY RX non-blade servers · PRIMERGY TX non-blade servers · Stylistic laptop and tablet computer products
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:23-cv-01562, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8756359B2 Inactive App. US13/744287

Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge to communicate serial bits of peripheral component interconnect bus transaction and low voltage differential signal channel to convey the serial bits

A computer system for multi-processing purposes. The computer system has a console comprising a first coupling site and a second coupling site. Each coupling site comprises a connector. The console is an enclosure that is capable of housing each coupling site. The system also has a plurality of computer modules, where each of the computer modules is coupled to a connector. Each of the computer modules has a processing unit, a main memory coupled to the processing unit, a graphics controller coupled to the processing unit, and a mass storage device coupled to the processing unit. Each of the computer modules is substantially similar in design to each other to provide independent processing of each of the computer modules in the computer system.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
17 Jun 2014
Earliest priority
14 May 1999
Est. expiry
12 May 2020
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2021-01095 · Other · filed by Intel Corp.IPR2021-01094 · Other · filed by Intel Corp.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F13/40G06F13/20G06F13/38G06F1/12G06F13/42
Prosecution counsel
COOLEY LLP
Examiner
PHAN, RAYMOND
US8756359B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8756359B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
USRE44739E1 Inactive App. US13/899484

Data security method and device for computer modules

A security method for an attached computer module in a computer system. The security method reads a security identification number in an attached computer module and compares it to a security identification number in a console, which houses the attached computer module. Based upon a relationship between these numbers, a security status is selected. The security status determines the security level of operating the computer system.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
28 Jan 2014
Est. expiry
14 May 2019
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2021-01102 · Other · filed by Intel Corporation
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F12/00
Prosecution counsel
COOLEY LLP
Examiner
SONG, HOSUK
USRE44739E1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
USRE44739E1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

8 more

The docket lists 10 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 8 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Paige Arnette AmstutzAcqis, LLCPlaintiff
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“CIVIL CASE OPENING ERROR.*** WRONG DIVISION *** This case was opened in the WRONG DIVISION by attorney, Paige Arnette Amstutzand will proceed in the Waco Division under case number 6:23-cv-878. The Waco Division has been notified viae-mail. (bc) (Entered: 12/22/2023)”

Case 1:23-cv-01562 · W.D. Tex. · closed 22 December 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:23-cv-01562?

1:23-cv-01562 is a patent infringement action brought by Acqis, LLC against Fujitsu, Ltd., filed on 22 Dec 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 22 December 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 1:23-cv-01562?

US8756359B2 (“Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge to communicate serial bits of peripheral component interconnect bus transaction and low voltage differential signal channel to convey the serial bits”), assigned to ACQIS LLC, currently inactive; USRE44739E1 (“Data security method and device for computer modules”), assigned to ACQIS LLC, currently inactive; US8626977B2 (“Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge to communicate serial bits of peripheral component interconnect bus transaction and low voltage differential signal channel to convey the serial bits”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; US9529769B2 (“Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge directly connected to a low voltage differential signal channel that communicates serial bits of a peripheral component interconnect bus transaction in opposite directions”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; USRE44654E1 (“Data security method and device for computer modules”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; USRE45140E1 (“Data security method and device for computer modules”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; US8977797B2 (“Method of improving peripheral component interface communications utilizing a low voltage differential signal channel”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; US9529768B2 (“Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge directly connected to a low voltage differential signal channel that communicates serial bits of a peripheral component interconnect bus transaction in opposite directions”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; US9703750B2 (“Computer system including CPU or peripheral bridge directly connected to a low voltage differential signal channel that communicates serial bits of a peripheral component interconnect bus transaction in opposite directions”), assigned to ACQIS LLC; US8234436B2 (“Computer system including peripheral bridge to communicate serial bits of peripheral component interconnect bus transaction and low voltage differential signal channel to convey the serial bits”), assigned to ACQIS LLC. The record also lists ESPRIMO desktop computers, Lifebook laptop and tablet computer products, PRIMERGY CX non-blade servers, PRIMERGY MX non-blade servers, PRIMERGY RX non-blade servers, PRIMERGY TX non-blade servers and Stylistic laptop and tablet computer products.

How was case 1:23-cv-01562 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case terminated. The termination text reads: “CIVIL CASE OPENING ERROR.*** WRONG DIVISION *** This case was opened in the WRONG DIVISION by attorney, Paige Arnette Amstutzand will proceed in the Waco Division under case number 6:23-cv-878. The Waco Division has been notified viae-mail. (bc) (Entered: 12/22/2023)”

How long did case 1:23-cv-01562 take?

0 calendar days, from filing on 22 Dec 2023 to closure on 22 December 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-01562?

Paige Arnette Amstutz is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Acqis.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:23-cv-01562 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-01562 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.