ACQIS LLC v. Giga-Byte Technology: Computer Interface Patent Dispute Ends in Stipulated Dismissal
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | ACQIS LLC v. Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. |
| Case Number | 6:24-cv-00249 (W.D. Texas) |
| Court | Western District of Texas, assigned to Chief Judge Alan D. Albright |
| Duration | May 2024 – May 2025 383 days |
| Outcome | Plaintiff Claims Dismissed with Prejudice – Confidential Resolution |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | BRIX Mini PC Series, Motherboards, Laptops, Enterprise/Server Platforms |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Non-practicing entity (NPE) with an established track record of enforcing patents related to computer bus interface technologies, particularly those concerning high-speed serial bus and PCIe architectures.
🛡️ Defendant
Taiwan-based multinational corporation and one of the world’s leading manufacturers of motherboards, graphics cards, laptops, mini PCs, and enterprise server solutions.
Patents at Issue
Four United States patents were asserted in this litigation:
- • US9529769B2 — covering computer system bus interface technologies
- • USRE044654E — a reissued patent related to serial computer bus interface implementations
- • USRE045140E — a second reissued patent in the same computer bus interface family
- • US8977797B2 — covering peripheral component interconnect and interface encoding technologies
Developing new hardware products?
Check if your computer interface designs might infringe these or related patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case was terminated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) via a stipulated dismissal — a joint filing by both ACQIS LLC and Giga-Byte Technology. ACQIS’s claims were dismissed with prejudice, Giga-Byte’s defenses without prejudice, and each party bore its own costs. No damages amount was publicly disclosed, indicating a confidential resolution.
Key Legal Issues and Strategic Significance
The stipulated dismissal structure—with prejudice for plaintiff’s claims, without prejudice for defendant’s defenses—is a hallmark of a confidential licensing resolution. Alternatively, it can reflect a defendant’s successful pressure campaign through IPR threats or strong invalidity contentions.
Several elements merit attention: the assertion of reissued patents (RE044654E, RE045140E) that can broaden claim scope; the deliberate venue strategy in the Western District of Texas under Chief Judge Alan D. Albright; and the strategic preservation of Giga-Byte’s defenses without prejudice.
Filing a computer interface patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in computer interface design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View the 4 asserted patents and their family trees
- Analyze ACQIS’s assertion history and target industries
- Understand claim scope for bus interface technologies
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
PCIe and serial bus architectures
4 Patents Asserted
In computer interface technology
Strategic Dismissal
Confidential licensing resolution likely
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Stipulated dismissal with prejudice (plaintiff) / without prejudice (defendant) is a structurally protective resolution for accused infringers.
Search related case law →Reissued patents in foundational technology areas carry amplified assertion risk across product generations.
Explore precedents →For R&D Teams
Conduct FTO analysis on PCIe and serial bus interface implementations before major product launches.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Architectural decisions standardizing interface technologies across product tiers require IP risk assessment.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.
📑 Table of Contents
🚀 Eureka IP Tools
🔍Novelty Search
Find prior art instantly
Patent Drafting
AI-assisted claim writing
FTO Analysis
Assess infringement risk
Concerned About Your Product?
Don’t wait for litigation. Check your product’s freedom to operate now.
Run FTO for My Product⚡ Accelerate Your IP Strategy
Join 15,000+ IP professionals using Eureka for patent research and analysis.