Adnexus Incorporated, LLC v. eBay, Inc.
Infringement action filed 23 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 31 Jul 2023, with US8719101B1 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8719101B1
- Application no.
- US12/731973
- Case no.
- 6:23-cv-00149
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- Jason K. Pulliam
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 23 Feb 2023 – 31 Jul 2023
- Duration
- 158 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed with Prejudice
- Products & marks
- System and method of on-line advertising
- Validity challenges
- 2 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and method of on-line advertising
A system and method according to which an advertisement associated with a first party that contains an interactive element displayed within the advertisement is displayed to a recipient in a network communication associated with a second party, an interface option within the advertisement is displayed as a result of an interaction by the recipient with the interactive element, contact information in the interface option is received from the recipient, and the contact information is stored in a database.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 6 May 2014
- Earliest priority
- 25 Mar 2009
- Est. expiry
- 23 Jul 2031
- Validity challenges
- 2 on record90015262 · EPR2025-002849 · Patentability · filed by ADNEXUS INC.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- BOOTH, TIMOTHY L. · SANDIFER, SHAWN
- Classification
- G06Q10/00
- Prosecution counsel
- Stonebridge IP, PLLC
- Examiner
- VIG, NARESH
Parties of record
Adnexus Incorporated, LLC
- Core tech
- G06Q10/00
- Counsel
- R. Scott Rhoades · Sanford E. Warren
- Firm
- Warren Rhoades LLP
eBay, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Joshua L. Raskin
- Firm
- Greenberg Traurig LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| R. Scott Rhoades | Adnexus Incorporated, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Sanford E. Warren | Adnexus Incorporated, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Joshua L. Raskin | eBay, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)A)(ii), Plaintiff Adnexus Incorporated and Defendant eBay Inc. stipulate and agree to dismissal of this action with prejudice, with all attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses to be borne by the party incurring the same.”
Case 6:23-cv-00149 · W.D. Tex. · closed 31 July 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 6:23-cv-00149?
6:23-cv-00149 is a patent infringement action brought by Adnexus Incorporated, LLC against eBay, Inc., filed on 23 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 31 July 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 6:23-cv-00149?
US8719101B1 (“System and method of on-line advertising”), assigned to ADNEXUS INCORPORATED, currently active. The record also lists System and method of on-line advertising.
How was case 6:23-cv-00149 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)A)(ii), Plaintiff Adnexus Incorporated and Defendant eBay Inc. stipulate and agree to dismissal of this action with prejudice, with all attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses to be borne by the party incurring the same.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 6:23-cv-00149 take?
158 calendar days, from filing on 23 Feb 2023 to closure on 31 July 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00149?
Chief Judge Jason K. Pulliam presided. R. Scott Rhoades and Sanford E. Warren are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Adnexus. Joshua L. Raskin appears for defendant eBay.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00149 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.