Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
AerSale v. Jetaire Aerospace | Patent Lawsuit 25-1177

AerSale, Inc. v. Jetaire Aerospace, LLC

25-1177 Fed. Cir. Closed 3 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 14 Nov 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 9 Apr 2026, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
25-1177
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
14 Nov 2024 – 9 Apr 2026
Duration
511 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Block foam method of accomplishing ignition mitigation in aircraft fuel tanks · Method and material for accomplishing ignition mitigation in tanks containing flammable liquid
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 25-1177, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10800541B2 Active App. US16/165609

Method and material for accomplishing ignition mitigation in tanks containing flammable liquid

The use of flexible foam material to provide ignition mitigation in fuel tanks is described. In one example, a system for ignition mitigation includes a number of foam blocks, wherein each foam block is pre-cut from a flexible foam material. Each foam block can have a unique profile corresponding to inner surfaces of a fuel tank at a particular sector within a compartment of the fuel tank. In other aspects, one or more of the foam blocks can include one or more upper cutouts to provide clearance for upper stiffeners in the fuel tank, one or more lower cutouts to provide clearance for lower stiffeners in the fuel tank, and one or more arcuate cutouts to provide clearance for a tank fuel pump. The foam blocks can be arranged in a stack corresponding to a sequential installation at respective sectors within the compartment of the fuel tank.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
13 Oct 2020
Est. expiry
11 Sep 2035
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
B64D37/32B64D37/08B64D37/06B64F5/00A62C3/08B60K15/03
Prosecution counsel
THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP
Examiner
BESLER, CHRISTOPHER J
US10800541B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10800541B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US9849998B2 Inactive App. US14/851511

Block foam method of accomplishing ignition mitigation in aircraft fuel tanks

A process method utilizing customized, specifically-shaped pieces of reticulated polyurethane foam (RPF) to fill an aircraft fuel tank or tank compartment to provide ignition mitigation and prevent explosion in the tank. The process involves inserting the shaped pieces of RPF through existing access ports into a fuel tank in order to fill the tank, excepting minimal planned void spaces. This process effects ignition mitigation by acting as an ignition blocker, mechanically interfering with the compression wave that precedes the flame front in an explosion, and changing the vaporous mixture above the fuel level (ullage) in the tank. The foam pieces are assembled and fitted together throughout the tank in a pattern that replicates the shape of the tank. After the foam insertion is complete, the fuel tank is filled with purging fluid, drained through a filter until no debris is found, and the new maximum fuel quantity is recalibrated.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
26 Dec 2017
Est. expiry
9 May 2036
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
B64D37/08B64D37/32B64D37/02B60K15/03
Prosecution counsel
THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP
Examiner
BESLER, CHRISTOPHER
US9849998B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US9849998B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

1 more

The docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The parties, having so agreed, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The above-captioned appeals are dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.”

Case 25-1177 · Fed. Cir. · closed 9 April 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 25-1177?

25-1177 is a patent infringement action brought by AerSale, Inc. against Jetaire Aerospace, LLC, filed on 14 Nov 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 9 April 2026.

Which patents were asserted in 25-1177?

US10800541B2 (“Method and material for accomplishing ignition mitigation in tanks containing flammable liquid”), assigned to JETAIRE AEROSPACE, LLC, currently active; US9849998B2 (“Block foam method of accomplishing ignition mitigation in aircraft fuel tanks”), assigned to JETAIRE AEROSPACE, LLC, currently inactive; US10633109B2 (“Method and material for accomplishing ignition mitigation in tanks containing flammable liquid”), assigned to JETAIRE AEROSPACE, LLC. The record also lists Block foam method of accomplishing ignition mitigation in aircraft fuel tanks and Method and material for accomplishing ignition mitigation in tanks containing flammable liquid.

How was case 25-1177 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “The parties, having so agreed, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The above-captioned appeals are dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.”

What does voluntary dismissal mean?

A voluntary dismissal is one the plaintiff asks for rather than one the court imposes. Where both sides stipulate to it, it commonly signals a settlement that is not filed on the public docket.

How long did case 25-1177 take?

511 calendar days, from filing on 14 Nov 2024 to closure on 9 April 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 25-1177?

Amelia Toy Rudolph, Regis Calvin Worley, Scott Penner and Valerie S. Sanders are recorded as counsel for plaintiff AerSale. James F. McDonough and Jonathan Lloyd Hardt appear for defendant Jetaire Aerospace.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 25-1177 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 25-1177 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.