Infringement action filed 24 Apr 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 2 Jun 2026, with 8 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed in part.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a passive relay device for farming vehicles and implements, as well as an online farming data exchange, which together enable capturing, processing and sharing farming operation data generated during combined use of the farming vehicle and farming implement at a farming business. The farming operation data includes detailed information about individual farming operations, including without limitation the type of farming operation, the location of the farming operation, the travel path for the farming operation, as well as operating parameters and operating events occurring while the farming operation is performed.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a passive relay device for farming vehicles and implements, as well as an online farming data exchange, which together enable capturing, processing and sharing farming operation data generated during combined use of the farming vehicle and farming implement at a farming business. The farming operation data includes detailed information about individual farming operations, including without limitation the type of farming operation, the location of the farming operation, the travel path for the farming operation, as well as operating parameters and operating events occurring while the farming operation is performed.
The docket lists 8 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 6 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
24-1730 is a patent infringement action brought by Agi Suretrack LLC against Farmers Edge, Inc., filed on 24 Apr 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 2 June 2026.
Which patents were asserted in 24-1730?
US11507899B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC, currently active; US10963825B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC, currently active; US11151485B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC; US11361260B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC; US11107017B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC; US11361261B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC; US11126937B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC; US11164116B2 (“Farming data collection and exchange system”), assigned to AGI SURETRACK LLC. The record also lists CanPlug device.
How was case 24-1730 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed in part. The termination text reads: "AFFIRMED-IN-PART, VACATED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED"
How long did case 24-1730 take?
769 calendar days, from filing on 24 Apr 2024 to closure on 2 June 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 24-1730?
Jonathan Stuart Kagan, Lucas Oxenford and Morgan Chu are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Agi Suretrack. Cole Thomas Tipton and Nathan S. Mammen appear for defendant Farmers Edge.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 24-1730 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-1730 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
