Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Agrosource v. Tj Biotech | Patent Lawsuit 26-1328

Agrosource, Inc. v. Tj Biotech, LLC

26-1328 Fed. Cir. Closed US12382956B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 12 Jan 2026 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 12 Feb 2026, with US12382956B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: .

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US12382956B2
Application no.
US17/516229
Case no.
26-1328
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
12 Jan 2026 – 12 Feb 2026
Duration
31 days
Basis of termination
None recorded
Products & marks
Antimicrobial compositions and methods for treating plant diseases
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 26-1328, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US12382956B2 Active App. US17/516229

Antimicrobial compositions and methods for treating plant diseases

An antimicrobial composition for treating plant diseases includes a solvent into which an antibiotic is substantially dissolved to achieve a concentration of the antibiotic sufficient to treat a bacterial infection in a plant. An acid is added to the solvent at a concentration sufficient to generate a pH in a range of 1.5 to less than 4.0. The antimicrobial can be delivered systemically to a plant, thereby allowing the antibiotic to treat a bacterial disease inflicting the plant.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
12 Aug 2025
Est. expiry
12 Sep 2042
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
A01N43/16A01G7/06A01N37/18A01N59/00A01P1/00
Examiner
BERONA, KIMBERLY S
US12382956B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US12382956B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). (2) Each side shall bear their own costs.”

Case 26-1328 · Fed. Cir. · closed 12 February 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 26-1328?

26-1328 is a patent infringement action brought by Agrosource, Inc. against Tj Biotech, LLC, filed on 12 Jan 2026 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 12 February 2026.

Which patent was asserted in 26-1328?

US12382956B2 (“Antimicrobial compositions and methods for treating plant diseases”), assigned to TJ BIOTECH LLC, currently active. The record also lists Antimicrobial compositions and methods for treating plant diseases.

How was case 26-1328 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is not recorded. The termination text reads: “The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). (2) Each side shall bear their own costs.”

How long did case 26-1328 take?

31 calendar days, from filing on 12 Jan 2026 to closure on 12 February 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 26-1328?

Dawson Gershuny, Laura A. Lydigsen, Madeline P. Paradkar and Mark Herbert Remus are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Agrosource. Chance Lyman, James Wilcox and Scott Lloyd Smith appear for defendant Tj Biotech.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 26-1328 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 26-1328 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.