Infringement action filed 18 Apr 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 12 Sep 2023, with 4 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed.
Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation · Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation, and handwriting and voice modification of orders · Internet online order method and apparatus
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 22-1674, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
An information management and synchronous communications system and method facilitates database equilibrium and synchronization with wired, wireless and Web-based systems, user-friendly and efficient generation of computerized menus and reservations with handwritten/voice modifications for restaurants and other applications that utilize equipment with nonstandard graphical formats, display sizes and/or applications for use in remote data entry, information management and communication with host computer, digital input device or remote pager via standard hardwired connection, the internet, a wireless link, printer or the like.
4 on recordCBM2015-00095 · Other · filed by Expedia, Inc.CBM2015-00081 · Other · filed by Apple, Inc.CBM2017-00053 · Other · filed by Starbucks CorporationCBM2014-00014 · filed by Agilysys, Inc.
An information management and synchronous communications system and method facilitates database equilibrium and synchronization with wired, wireless and Web-based systems, user-friendly and efficient generation of computerized menus and reservations for restaurant and other applications that utilize equipment with nonstandard graphical formats, display size and application for use in remote data entry, information management and communication with host computer, digital input device or remote pager via standard hardwired connection, the internet, a wireless link.
5 on recordCBM2015-00097 · Other · filed by Expedia, Inc.CBM2015-00082 · Other · filed by Apple, Inc.CBM2015-00099 · filed by Starbucks CorporationCBM2016-00006 · Other · filed by Apple, Inc.CBM2014-00016 · Other · filed by Agilysis, Inc.
The docket lists 4 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 2 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
22-1674 is a patent infringement action brought by Ameranth, Inc. against Mobo Systems, Inc., filed on 18 Apr 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 12 September 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 22-1674?
US8146077B2 (“Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation, and handwriting and voice modification of orders”), assigned to AMERANTH, INC., currently inactive; US6871325B1 (“Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation”), assigned to AMERANTH WIRELESS, INC., currently inactive; US8738449B1 (“Internet online order method and apparatus”), assigned to IPDEV CO.; US6384850B1 (“Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation”), assigned to AMERANTH TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.. The record also lists Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation, Information management and synchronous communications system with menu generation, and handwriting and voice modification of orders and Internet online order method and apparatus.
How was case 22-1674 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed. The termination text reads: "THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED."
How long did case 22-1674 take?
512 calendar days, from filing on 18 Apr 2022 to closure on 12 September 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 22-1674?
Richard C. Weinblatt is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Ameranth. Lowell D. Mead appears for defendant Mobo Systems.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 22-1674 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 22-1674 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
