“This action having been commenced by Annex Products Pty Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) against the Defendants identified in Schedule A attached hereto (collectively the “Defaulting Defendants”), and Plaintiff having moved for entry of Default and Default Judgment against the Defaulting Defendants. This Court having entered a temporary restraining order; Plaintiff having properly completed service of process on the Defaulting Defendants, the combination of providing notice via electronic publication and e-mail, along with any notice that the Defaulting Defendants received from domain name registrars and payment processors, being notice reasonably calculated under all circumstances to apprise the Defaulting Defendants of the pendency of the action and affording them the opportunity to answer and present their objections; and Defaulting Defendants having not answered or appeared in any way, and the time for answering having expired, so that the allegations of the Complaint are uncontroverted and are deemed admitted;This Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over the Defaulting Defendants because the Defaulting Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Plaintiff has provided a basis to conclude that the Defaulting Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more seller aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, and have sold products using infringing and/or counterfeit versions of Plaintiff’s federally registered design patents, copyrights, and trademarks (the “Plaintiff Intellectual Property”) to residents of Illinois. In this case, Plaintiff has presented screenshot evidence that the Defendants’ e-commerce stores are reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive internet stores through which Illinois residents can and do purchase products using counterfeit versions of the Plaintiff Intellectual Property. See [7-5] to [7-10], which includes screenshot evidence confirming that each Defendant e-commerce store does stand ready, willing, and able to ship its counterfeit goods to customers in Illinois bearing infringing and/or counterfeit versions of the Plaintiff Intellectual Property. A list of the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property is included in the below charts. This Court further finds that Defaulting Defendants are liable for design patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 271), copyright infringement (17 U.S.C. 501(a)), willful federal trademark infringement and counterfeiting (15 U.S.C. § 1114), false designation of origin (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), and violation of the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (815 ILCS § 510 et seq.). Accordingly, this Court orders that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment is GRANTED as follows, that the Defaulting Defendants are deemed in default, and that this Default Judgment is entered against the Defaulting Defendants. This Court further orders that: 1. Defaulting Defendants, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting for, with, by, through, under, or in active concert with it be permanently enjoined and restrained from:using the Plaintiff Intellectual Property or any reproductions, counterfeit copies, or colorable imitations in any manner in connection with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any product that is not a genuine Plaintiff product or not authorized by Plaintiff to be sold in connection with the Plaintiff Intellectual Property; b. passing off, inducing, or enabling others to sell or pass off any product as a genuine Plaintiff product or any other product produced by Plaintiff, that is not Plaintiff’s or not produced under the authorization, control, or supervision of Plaintiff and approved by Plaintiff for sale under the Plaintiff Intellectual Property; c. committing any acts calculated to cause consumers to believe that Defaulting Defendants’ products are those sold under the authorization, control, or supervision of Plaintiff, or are sponsored by, approved by, or otherwise connected with Plaintiff; and d. manufacturing, shipping, delivering, holding for sale, transferring or otherwise moving, storing, distributing, returning, or otherwise disposing of, in any manner, products or inventory not manufactured by or for Plaintiff, nor authorized by Plaintiff to be sold or offered for sale, and which bear any of Plaintiff’s trademarks, including the Plaintiff Intellectual Property, or any reproductions, counterfeit copies or colorable imitations. 2. The domain name registries for the Defendant Domain Names, including, but not limited to, VeriSign, Inc., Neustar, Inc., Afilias Limited, CentralNic, Nominet, and the Public Interest Registry, and the domain name registrars, including, but not limited to, GoDaddy Operating Company LLC, Name.com, PDR LTD. d/b/a/ PublicDomainRegistry.com, and Namecheap Inc., within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order, shall, at Plaintiff’s choosing: a. transfer the Defendant Domain Names to Plaintiff’s control, including unlocking and changing the registrar of record for the Defendant Domain Names to a registrar of Plaintiff’s selection, and the domain name registrars shall take any steps necessary to transfer the Defendant Domain Names to a registrar of Plaintiff’s selection; or b. disable the Defendant Domain Names and make them inactive and untransferable. 3. Defaulting Defendants and any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defaulting Defendants, or in connection with the Defaulting Defendants’ Online Marketplaces, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Alibaba Group Holding Limited., Alibaba.com, Inc., Alibaba.com US E-commerce Corp., Alibaba.com U.S. LLC, Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc., AUS Merchant Services, Inc., and Alipay US, Inc. (“Alibaba,” “AliExpress,” and/or “AliPay”); Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”); DHgate.com Inc. (“DHgate”); eBay Inc. (“eBay”); Fruugo Ltd. (“Fruugo”); Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. and Shein US Services LLC (“Shein”); Shopify Inc. (“Shopify”); PDD Holdings (“Temu”); Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”); ContextLogic Inc. (“Wish”); LianLian Global, LL Pay U.S., LLC, and Lianlian Yintong Electronic Payment Co. Ltd. (“LianLian”); Payoneer Global Inc. (“Payoneer”); PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal”); Stripe Inc. (“Stripe”) (collectively, the “Third Party Providers”), shall within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order cease: a. using, linking to, transferring, selling, exercising control over, or otherwise owning the Online Marketplace Accounts, or any other online marketplace account that is being used to sell or is the means by which the Defaulting Defendants could continue to sell counterfeit and infringing goods using the Plaintiff Intellectual Property; and b. operating and/or hosting websites that are involved with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any product bearing the Plaintiff Intellectual Property or any reproductions, counterfeit copies or colorable imitations thereof that is not a genuine Plaintiff product or not authorized by Plaintiff to be sold in connection with the Plaintiff Intellectual Property. 4. Upon Plaintiff’s request, those with notice of this Order, including the Third-Party Providers as defined in Paragraph 3, shall within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, disable and cease displaying any advertisements used by or associated with Defaulting Defendants in connection with the sale of counterfeit and infringing goods using the Plaintiff Intellectual Property. 5. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2) and 17 U.S. § 504(c)(2), Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages from the Defaulting Defendants in the amount of $100,000 for willful use of counterfeit Plaintiff Trademark and Copyrights on products sold through at least the Defendant Internet Store. This award shall apply to Defaulting Defendants only once, even if they are listed under multiple different aliases in the Complaint and Schedule A. 6. Any Third Party Providers holding funds for Defaulting Defendants, including, Alibaba, AliExpress, Amazon, DHgate, eBay, Fruugo, Shein, Shopify, Temu, Walmart, Shein, LianLian, PayPal, Payoneer, and Stripe shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order, permanently restrain and enjoin any accounts connected to the Defaulting Defendants or the Defendant Internet Stores from transferring or disposing of any funds (up to the statutory damages awarded in Paragraph 6 above) or other of Defaulting Defendants’ assets. 7. All monies (up to the amount of the statutory damages awarded in Paragraph 5 above) currently restrained in Defaulting Defendants’ financial accounts, including monies held by Third Party Providers, as defined in Paragraph 3, are hereby released to Plaintiff as partial payment of the above-identified damages, and Third Party Providers are ordered to release to Plaintiff the amounts from Defaulting Defendants’ financial accounts within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of this Order. 8. Until Plaintiff has recovered full payment of monies owed to it by the Defaulting Defendants, Plaintiff shall have the ongoing authority to commence supplemental proceedings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69. 9. In the event that Plaintiff identifies any additional online marketplace accounts or financial accounts owned by the Defaulting Defendants, Plaintiff may send notice of any supplemental proceeding, including a citation to discover assets, to the Defaulting Defendants by e-mail to any e-mail addresses provided for the Defaulting Defendants by third parties. 10.The $267,000.00 surety bond posted by Plaintiff is hereby released to Plaintiff or its counsel, Flener IP & Business Law (along with any interest earned thereon). The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff or its counsel (along with any interest earned thereon).”