Infringement action filed 26 Dec 2023 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 19 Mar 2026, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed.
Multiple wavelength sensor substrate · Physiological monitoring devices, systems, and methods · User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 24-1285, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
The present disclosure relates to noninvasive methods, devices, and systems for measuring various blood constituents or analytes, such as glucose. In an embodiment, a light source comprises LEDs and super-luminescent LEDs. The light source emits light at at least wavelengths of about 1610 nm, about 1640 nm, and about 1665 nm. In an embodiment, the detector comprises a plurality of photodetectors arranged in a special geometry comprising one of a substantially linear substantially equal spaced geometry, a substantially linear substantially non-equal spaced geometry, and a substantially grid geometry.
A non-invasive, optical-based physiological monitoring system is disclosed. One embodiment includes an emitter configured to emit light. A diffuser is configured to receive and spread the emitted light, and to emit the spread light at a tissue measurement site. The system further includes a concentrator configured to receive the spread light after it has been attenuated by or reflected from the tissue measurement site. The concentrator is also configured to collect and concentrate the received light and to emit the concentrated light to a detector. The detector is configured to detect the concentrated light and to transmit a signal representative of the detected light. A processor is configured to receive the transmitted signal and to determine a physiological parameter, such as, for example, arterial oxygen saturation, in the tissue measurement site.
8 on recordIPR2022-01465 · Patentability · filed by Masimo Corp.90016145 · EPR · filed by Fish & Richardson PCIPR2022-01292 · Patentability · filed by APPLE INC.IPR2022-01291 · Patentability · filed by APPLE INC.IPR2022-01291 · Patentability · filed by Masimo Corp.90019457 · EPRIPR2022-01466 · Other · filed by Apple Inc.IPR2022-01465 · Patentability · filed by Apple, Inc.
The docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
24-1285 is a patent infringement action brought by Apple, Inc. against International Trade Commission, filed on 26 Dec 2023 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 19 March 2026.
Which patents were asserted in 24-1285?
US10912502B2 (“User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user”), assigned to MASIMO CORPORATION, currently active; US10687745B1 (“Physiological monitoring devices, systems, and methods”), assigned to MASIMO CORPORATION, currently active; US7761127B2 (“Multiple wavelength sensor substrate”), assigned to WILLOW LABORATORIES, INC.; US10945648B2 (“User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user”), assigned to MASIMO CORPORATION; US10912501B2 (“User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user”), assigned to MASIMO CORPORATION. The record also lists Multiple wavelength sensor substrate, Physiological monitoring devices, systems, and methods and User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user.
How was case 24-1285 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed. The termination text reads: "THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED"
How long did case 24-1285 take?
814 calendar days, from filing on 26 Dec 2023 to closure on 19 March 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 24-1285?
David P. Yin, Derek Anthony Gosma, Joseph J. Mueller, Mark D. Selwyn, Sarah R. Frazier and Thomas Gregory Sprankling are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Apple. Houda Morad, Margaret D. Macdonald, Michelle W. Klancnik and Ronald Traud appear for defendant International Trade Commission.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 24-1285 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-1285 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
