AR Design Innovations, LLC v. City Furniture, Inc.
Infringement action filed 11 Jan 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and closed 13 Jun 2023, with US7277572B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case settled.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US7277572B2
- Application no.
- US10/683825
- Case no.
- 1:23-cv-20127
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- S.D. Fla.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Florida
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 11 Jan 2023 – 13 Jun 2023
- Duration
- 153 days
- Basis of termination
- Case Settled
- Products & marks
- Three-dimensional interior design system
- Validity challenges
- 3 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Three-dimensional interior design system
A system and method in a client-server computing environment is provided for generating and rendering a photorealistic three-dimensional (3D) perspective view of a 3D object selectively positioned within a 3D scene. A client is configured for communicably accessing a server, and includes a client application configured for scene editing and rendering, using a graphical user interface (GUI). The 3D scene may be selectively displayed in a plurality of views, and a 3D object may be retrieved from the server and imported into the 3D scene to generate a composite. The 3D object may also be manipulated within the composite for placement and orientation. A 3D image of the composite may then be rendered at the client and selectively reconfigured in real time. Luminosity characteristics may be applied to the 3D image; followed by rendering a photorealistic 3D view of the composite image.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 2 Oct 2007
- Est. expiry
- 30 Mar 2026
- Validity challenges
- 3 on recordIPR2022-01169 · filed by Inter IKEA Systems B.V.IPR2021-00271 · Other · filed by Marxent Labs, LLCIPR2021-00085 · filed by Marxent Labs, LLC
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- MACINNES, CATHRYN · PEARLSTEIN, GERALD
- Classification
- G06K9/00G06T19/20G06FG06F3/00G06F17/50
- Examiner
- MARIAM, DANIEL
Parties of record
AR Design Innovations, LLC
- Core tech
- G06K9/00G06T19/20G06FG06F3/00
- Counsel
- C. Matthew Rozier · James F. McDonough III · Jonathan L. Hardt · Jonathan R. Miller · Marcos Daniel Jimenez · Travis E. Lynch
- Firm
- Leon Cosgrove Jimenez, LLP, Rozier Hardt McDonough PLLC
City Furniture, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Adil A. Shaikh · Frank Anthony Florio · George S. LeMieux · Jonathan Kent Osborne · Neil J. McNabnay · Ricardo J. Bonilla
- Firm
- Fish & Richardson, PC, Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart PA, Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| C. Matthew Rozier | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| James F. McDonough III | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Jonathan L. Hardt | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Jonathan R. Miller | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Marcos Daniel Jimenez | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Travis E. Lynch | AR Design Innovations, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Adil A. Shaikh | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
| Frank Anthony Florio | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
| George S. LeMieux | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
| Jonathan Kent Osborne | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
| Neil J. McNabnay | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
| Ricardo J. Bonilla | City Furniture, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Notice of Settlement, ECF No. [44], filed on June 12, 2023, indicating that the parties have reached a settlement of the claims in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file appropriate dismissal documentation. 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. 3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED.”
Case 1:23-cv-20127 · S.D. Fla. · closed 13 June 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:23-cv-20127?
1:23-cv-20127 is a patent infringement action brought by AR Design Innovations, LLC against City Furniture, Inc., filed on 11 Jan 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case closed on 13 June 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 1:23-cv-20127?
US7277572B2 (“Three-dimensional interior design system”), assigned to AR DESIGN INNOVATIONS LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Three-dimensional interior design system.
How was case 1:23-cv-20127 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case settled. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Notice of Settlement, ECF No. [44], filed on June 12, 2023, indicating that the parties have reached a settlement of the claims in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file appropriate dismissal documentation. 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. 3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMIN
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 1:23-cv-20127 take?
153 calendar days, from filing on 11 Jan 2023 to closure on 13 June 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-20127?
C. Matthew Rozier, James F. McDonough III, Jonathan L. Hardt, Jonathan R. Miller, Marcos Daniel Jimenez and Travis E. Lynch are recorded as counsel for plaintiff AR Design Innovations. Adil A. Shaikh, Frank Anthony Florio, George S. LeMieux, Jonathan Kent Osborne, Neil J. McNabnay and Ricardo J. Bonilla appear for defendant City Furniture.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-20127 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.