Atomic IP LLC v. Sumo Logic, Inc.
Infringement action filed 5 Jan 2026 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 25 Mar 2026, with US8924869B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed without prejudice.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8924869B2
- Application no.
- US11/504361
- Case no.
- 1:26-cv-00010
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- Robert Pitman
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 5 Jan 2026 – 25 Mar 2026
- Duration
- 79 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed without Prejudice
- Products & marks
- Sumo Logic Platform
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Service for generation of customizable display widgets
A system for presenting dynamically generated images in a computing environment is provided. The system generates visual elements, such as widgets, for example, by combining image data, user-defined data which may include alphanumeric data, and real-time data indicative of current conditions. The widgets may be implemented in a purely server-side application environment which alleviates the need for any installation of client software on the client computing device.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 30 Dec 2014
- Earliest priority
- 12 Aug 2005
- Est. expiry
- 26 Jun 2032
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- FELLMAN, BARRY
- Classification
- G06F3/048G06F3/00G06F9/44
- Examiner
- BASHORE, WILLIAM
Parties of record
Atomic IP LLC
- Core tech
- G06F3/048G06F3/00G06F9/44
- Counsel
- Bradford J. Black
- Firm
- Bradford Black PC
Sumo Logic, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Christopher T. Bovenkamp · Mitchell R. Sibley · Steven Chase Callahan
- Firm
- Charhon, Callahan, Robson & Garza PLLC
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford J. Black | Atomic IP LLC | Plaintiff |
| Christopher T. Bovenkamp | Sumo Logic, Inc. | Defendant |
| Mitchell R. Sibley | Sumo Logic, Inc. | Defendant |
| Steven Chase Callahan | Sumo Logic, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“On March 24, 2026, the parties dismissed all claims in this case by joint stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. 13). Plaintiff dismissed its claims with prejudice; Defendant dismissed its claims without prejudice. (Id.). “Stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . require no judicial action or approval and are effective automatically upon filing.” Yesh Music v. Lakewood Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013). As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED.”
Case 1:26-cv-00010 · W.D. Tex. · closed 25 March 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:26-cv-00010?
1:26-cv-00010 is a patent infringement action brought by Atomic IP LLC against Sumo Logic, Inc., filed on 5 Jan 2026 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 25 March 2026.
Which patent was asserted in 1:26-cv-00010?
US8924869B2 (“Service for generation of customizable display widgets”), assigned to ATOMIC IP, LLC, currently active. The record also lists Sumo Logic Platform.
How was case 1:26-cv-00010 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed without prejudice. The termination text reads: “On March 24, 2026, the parties dismissed all claims in this case by joint stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. 13). Plaintiff dismissed its claims with prejudice; Defendant dismissed its claims without prejudice. (Id.). “Stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . require no judicial action or approval and are effective automatically upon filing.” Yesh Music v. Lakewood Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013). As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:26-cv-00010 take?
79 calendar days, from filing on 5 Jan 2026 to closure on 25 March 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:26-cv-00010?
Chief Judge Robert Pitman presided. Bradford J. Black is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Atomic IP. Christopher T. Bovenkamp, Mitchell R. Sibley and Steven Chase Callahan appear for defendant Sumo Logic.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:26-cv-00010 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.