Infringement action filed 23 Jun 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 3 Oct 2023, with 7 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Integrated circuits, or a set of integrated circuits for wireless communications devices · RA4W1 group of single-chip, 32-bit microcontrollers (“RA4W1”) and their DA1469x family of multi-core wireless microcontrollers (“DA1469x”), both with Bluetooth low energy connectivity · RX651 and RL78/G1H microcontrollers comply with the Wi-SUN FAN Profile as described in IEEE 802.15.4e
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:22-cv-00614, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
An approach for selecting sets of communications channels involves determining the performance of communications channels. A set of channels is selected based on the results of performance testing and specified criteria. The participant generates data that identifies the selected set of channels and provides that data to other participants of the communications network. The participants communicate over the set of channels, such as by using a frequency hopping protocol. When a specified time expires or monitoring of the performance of the channel set identifies poor performance of the set of channels, the participant selects another set of channels for use in communications based on additional performance testing. By selecting channels based on the initial performance testing and performance monitoring, the communications network adaptively avoids channels with poor performance.
An approach for selecting sets of communications channels involves determining the performance of communications channels. A set of channels is selected based on the results of performance testing and specified criteria. The participant generates data that identifies the selected set of channels and provides that data to other participants of the communications network. The participants communicate over the set of channels, such as by using a frequency hopping protocol. When a specified time expires or monitoring of the performance of the channel set identifies poor performance of the set of channels, the participant selects another set of channels for use in communications based on additional performance testing. By selecting channels based on the initial performance testing and performance monitoring, the communications network adaptively avoids channels with poor performance.
The docket lists 7 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 5 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket.Compare both portfolios
Outcome
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim
"The Court has before it the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Bandspeed LLC (“Bandspeed”) and Defendants Renesas Electronics Corporation, Renesas Electronics America Inc., and Dialog Semiconductor B.V. (collectively, “Renesas”) filed October 2, 2023. (Dkt. # 45.) The Court is of the opinion that such Stipulation is well taken and should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that all claims and causes of action brought by Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-captioned lawsuit are DISMISSED in their entirety WITH prejudice, and that, as between Plaintiff and Defendant, each will bear their own costs, expenses, and legal fees in this case. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED TO CLOSE THE CASE."
Case 1:22-cv-00614 · W.D. Tex. · closed 3 October 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
1:22-cv-00614 is a patent infringement action brought by Bandspeed, Inc. against Renesas Electronics Corporation, filed on 23 Jun 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 3 October 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 1:22-cv-00614?
US10602528B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC, currently inactive; US7903608B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC, currently inactive; US9379769B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC; US8542643B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC; US8873500B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC; US10791565B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED LLC; US9883520B2 (“Approach for managing the use of communications channels based on performance”), assigned to BANDSPEED, LLC. The record also lists Integrated circuits, or a set of integrated circuits for wireless communications devices, RA4W1 group of single-chip, 32-bit microcontrollers (“RA4W1”) and their DA1469x family of multi-core wireless microcontrollers (“DA1469x”), both with Bluetooth low energy connectivity and RX651 and RL78/G1H microcontrollers comply with the Wi-SUN FAN Profile as described in IEEE 802.15.4e.
How was case 1:22-cv-00614 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: "The Court has before it the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Bandspeed LLC (“Bandspeed”) and Defendants Renesas Electronics Corporation, Renesas Electronics America Inc., and Dialog Semiconductor B.V. (collectively, “Renesas”) filed October 2, 2023. (Dkt. # 45.) The Court is of the opinion that such Stipulation is well taken and should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that all claims and causes of action brought by Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-captioned lawsuit are DISMISSED in their entirety WITH prejudice, and that, as between Plaintiff and Defendant, each will bear t
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:22-cv-00614 take?
467 calendar days, from filing on 23 Jun 2022 to closure on 3 October 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-00614?
Chief Judge David Alan Ezra presided. Adam G. Price, Christopher V. Goodpastor and Gabriel R. Gervey are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Bandspeed. Christopher T. Bovenkamp, Jason A. Crotty, Jason R. Bartlett and Steven Chase Callahan appear for defendant Renesas Electronics.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:22-cv-00614 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-00614 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
