Bataan Licensing, LLC v. Contemporary Control Systems, Inc.
Infringement action filed 29 Nov 2022 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and closed 14 Feb 2023, with US7423982B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US7423982B2
- Application no.
- US10/237299
- Case no.
- 1:22-cv-06667
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- N.D. Ill.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Illinois
- Chief judge
- Joan B. Gottschall
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 29 Nov 2022 – 14 Feb 2023
- Duration
- 77 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Adaptive communication modes
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Adaptive communication modes
Systems and methods for implementing a communication mode for a communication terminal are provided. An embodiment of a method for implementing a communication mode includes receiving a message from a remotely located network control system and implementing one of a plurality of communication modes responsive to the message.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 9 Sep 2008
- Est. expiry
- 17 Jul 2024
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- BRIGGS, PETER G. · JAGELS, DEAN P.
- Classification
- H04L12/66H04L12/28H04L29/06
- Prosecution counsel
- SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC.
- Examiner
- PHAM, CHI H.
Parties of record
Bataan Licensing, LLC
- Core tech
- H04L12/66H04L12/28H04L29/06
- Counsel
- David Randolph Bennett · Steven G. Kalberg
- Firm
- Direction IP law
Contemporary Control Systems, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Randolph Bennett | Bataan Licensing, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Steven G. Kalberg | Bataan Licensing, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Bataan Licensing LLC hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). According to Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Bataan Licensing LLC voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1).”
Case 1:22-cv-06667 · N.D. Ill. · closed 14 February 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:22-cv-06667?
1:22-cv-06667 is a patent infringement action brought by Bataan Licensing, LLC against Contemporary Control Systems, Inc., filed on 29 Nov 2022 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case closed on 14 February 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 1:22-cv-06667?
US7423982B2 (“Adaptive communication modes”), assigned to CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., currently inactive. The record also lists Adaptive communication modes.
How was case 1:22-cv-06667 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Bataan Licensing LLC hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). According to Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Bataan Licensing LLC voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1).”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:22-cv-06667 take?
77 calendar days, from filing on 29 Nov 2022 to closure on 14 February 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-06667?
Chief Judge Joan B. Gottschall presided. David Randolph Bennett and Steven G. Kalberg are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Bataan Licensing.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-06667 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.