Bausch & Lomb, Inc. et al. v. Lupin Limited et al.
Infringement action filed 3 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and closed 8 Aug 2023, with US11596600B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US11596600B2
- Application no.
- US17/585395
- Case no.
- 3:23-cv-02452
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D.N.J.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- New Jersey
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 3 May 2023 – 8 Aug 2023
- Duration
- 97 days
- Basis of termination
- Case Dismissed
- Products & marks
- Vasoconstriction compositions and methods of use
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Vasoconstriction compositions and methods of use
The invention generally relates to compositions for inducing vasoconstriction. The compositions comprise highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, at low concentrations, such as below 0.05% weight by volume. The compositions preferably comprise brimonidine. The compositions preferably have pH between about 5.5 and about 6.5.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 7 Mar 2023
- Earliest priority
- 12 Feb 2009
- Est. expiry
- 27 Jul 2029
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2024-00563 · Patentability · filed by DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES S.A.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- HORN, GERALD
- Classification
- A61K9/48A61K9/00A61K9/08A61K45/06A61K31/44A61K31/498
- Prosecution counsel
- COOLEY LLP
- Examiner
- SZNAIDMAN, MARCOS L
Parties of record
Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- J. Brugh Lower · William P. Deni
- Firm
- Gibbons PC
- Also named
- Bausch & Lomb Ireland Limited · Eye Therapies, LLC
Lupin Limited
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- James S. Richter
- Firm
- Midlige Richter LLC
- Also named
- Lupin Atlantis Holdings, S.A. · Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Lupin, Inc.
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| J. Brugh Lower | Bausch & Lomb, Inc. | Plaintiff |
| William P. Deni | Bausch & Lomb, Inc. | Plaintiff |
| James S. Richter | Lupin Limited | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding schedule between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 7/6/2023. (jdg) (Main Document 17 replaced on 7/10/2023) (kht, ). (Entered: 07/06/2023).Civil Case Terminated per 17 Stipulation and Order. (jmh) (Entered: 08/08/2023).”
Case 3:23-cv-02452 · D.N.J. · closed 8 August 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 3:23-cv-02452?
3:23-cv-02452 is a patent infringement action brought by Bausch & Lomb, Inc. against Lupin Limited, filed on 3 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The case closed on 8 August 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 3:23-cv-02452?
US11596600B2 (“Vasoconstriction compositions and methods of use”), assigned to EYE THERAPIES LLC, currently active. The record also lists Vasoconstriction compositions and methods of use.
How was case 3:23-cv-02452 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: “STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding schedule between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 7/6/2023. (jdg) (Main Document 17 replaced on 7/10/2023) (kht, ). (Entered: 07/06/2023).Civil Case Terminated per 17 Stipulation and Order. (jmh) (Entered: 08/08/2023).”
How long did case 3:23-cv-02452 take?
97 calendar days, from filing on 3 May 2023 to closure on 8 August 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:23-cv-02452?
J. Brugh Lower and William P. Deni are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Bausch & Lomb. James S. Richter appears for defendant Lupin.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:23-cv-02452 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.