Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Beacon Navigation v. Hyundai Electronics Industries et al. | Patent Lawsuit 2:13-cv-11416

Beacon Navigation, GmbH v. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. et al.

2:13-cv-11416 E.D. Mich. Closed US5862511A
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 29 Mar 2013 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and closed 1 Sep 2023, with US5862511A asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US5862511A
Application no.
US08/580150
Case no.
2:13-cv-11416
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
E.D. Mich.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Michigan
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
29 Mar 2013 – 1 Sep 2023
Duration
3808 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed with Prejudice
Products & marks
Hyundai Azera · Hyundai Elantra · Hyundai Equus · Hyundai Genesis · Hyundai Santa Fe · Hyundai Sonata · Hyundai Tucson · Hyundai Veloster · Hyundai Veracruz
Validity challenges
7 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:13-cv-11416, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US5862511A Inactive App. US08/580150

Vehicle navigation system and method

The improved vehicle navigation system and method uses information from a Global Positioning System (GPS) to obtain velocity vectors, which include speed and heading components, for “dead reckoning” the vehicle position from a previous position. If information from the GPS is not available, then the improved vehicle navigation system uses information from an orthogonal axes accelerometer, such as two or three orthogonally positioned accelerometers, to propagate vehicle position. Because the GPS information should almost always be available, the improved vehicle navigation system relies less on its accelerometers, thereby allowing the use of less expensive accelerometers. The improved vehicle navigation system retains the accuracy of the accelerometers by repeatedly calibrating them with the velocity data obtained from the GPS information. The improved vehicle navigation system calibrates the sensors whenever GPS data is available (for example, once a second at relatively high speeds). Furthermore, the improved vehicle navigation system does not need to rely on map matching to calibrate sensors. System flexibility is improved because map matching is oblivious to the hardware, and the system hardware can be updated without affecting map matching or a change in the map database.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
19 Jan 1999
Est. expiry
28 Dec 2015
Validity challenges
7 on recordIPR2013-00027 · filed by Denso Corporation90012109 · EPR · filed by BEACON NAVIGATION GMBH90014170 · EPR · filed by MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC90013730 · EPR · filed by MATTHEW D. SATCHWELL90014202 · EPR · filed by BMW OF NORTH AMERICA ,LLC90012743 · EPR · filed by VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.90013732 · EPR · filed by VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G01C21/30G01C21/28G01S5/14G01S11/10G01S11/00G01C21/00G01P21/00G01S19/14G01S19/23G08G1/0969
Prosecution counsel
HELSELL FETTERMAN LLP
Examiner
LOUIS-JACQUES, JACQUES H.
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Defendant

Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.

Core tech
Not recorded
Counsel
Jack B. Blumenfeld · John A. VanOphem · John M. Caracappa · Matthew D. Satchwell · Paul D. Lall · Thomas C. Yebernetsky · Thomas E. Bejin · William J. Barrow
Firm
Bejin Bieneman PLC, DLA Piper LLP (US), Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Vanophem IP Law PLC
Also named
Hyundai Motor America · Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Plaintiff Beacon Navigation GmbH and Defendants Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Manufacturing Alabama, LLC hereby stipulate, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), for an order dismissing all claims and counterclaims currently and previously pled in this case WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorney fees.”

Case 2:13-cv-11416 · E.D. Mich. · closed 1 September 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:13-cv-11416?

2:13-cv-11416 is a patent infringement action brought by Beacon Navigation, GmbH against Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd., filed on 29 Mar 2013 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The case closed on 1 September 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 2:13-cv-11416?

US5862511A (“Vehicle navigation system and method”), assigned to BEACON NAVIGATION GMBH, currently inactive. The record also lists Hyundai Azera, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Equus, Hyundai Genesis, Hyundai Santa Fe, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Veloster and Hyundai Veracruz.

How was case 2:13-cv-11416 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Beacon Navigation GmbH and Defendants Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Manufacturing Alabama, LLC hereby stipulate, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), for an order dismissing all claims and counterclaims currently and previously pled in this case WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorney fees.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 2:13-cv-11416 take?

3808 calendar days, from filing on 29 Mar 2013 to closure on 1 September 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:13-cv-11416?

Craig Robert Kaufman, Jay M. Schloff, Keith A. Schonberger, Kevin Christopher Jones and Michael C. Ting are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Beacon Navigation. Jack B. Blumenfeld, John A. VanOphem, John M. Caracappa, Matthew D. Satchwell, Paul D. Lall, Thomas C. Yebernetsky, Thomas E. Bejin and William J. Barrow appear for defendant Hyundai Electronics Industries.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:13-cv-11416 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:13-cv-11416 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.