Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Brian Robert Blazer v. Best Bee Brothers et al. | Patent Lawsuit 2:20-cv-00480

Brian Robert Blazer v. Best Bee Brothers LLC et al.

2:20-cv-00480 E.D. Wis. Closed 2 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 25 Mar 2020 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and closed 24 Apr 2023, with 2 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: consent judgment.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patents involved
USRE46421E1US8375624B2
Case no.
2:20-cv-00480
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
E.D. Wis.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Wisconsin
Chief judge
Brett H Ludwig
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
25 Mar 2020 – 24 Apr 2023
Duration
1125 days
Basis of termination
Consent Judgment
Products & marks
Carpenter bee traps
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:20-cv-00480, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
USRE46421E1 Active App. US14/625478

Carpenter bee traps

A carpenter bee trap having at least one entrance hole, at least one plenum section connecting the at least one entrance hole to at least one receptacle adapter coupling, and least one removable receptacle attached to at least one receptacle adapter coupling, the at least one removable receptacle made of a material that admits ambient light to a greater extent than the material forming the plenum such that insects entering the trap follow a path of increasing intensity of ambient light that leads them to the receptacle. In one embodiment, existing carpenter bee nests are treated with a disclosed insecticide gel. The insecticide gel consists of a thixotropic, injectable, non-hardening, non-volatile gel blended with a pyrethroid insecticide, in effect converting the bee nest into a trap.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
6 Jun 2017
Est. expiry
7 Mar 2031
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
A01M1/20A01M1/10
Examiner
FLANAGAN, BEVERLY M
USRE46421E1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
USRE46421E1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US8375624B2 Inactive App. US12/430148

Carpenter bee traps

A carpenter bee trap having at least one entrance hole, at least one plenum section connecting the at least one entrance hole to at least one receptacle adapter coupling, and least one removable receptacle attached to at least one receptacle adapter coupling, the at least one removable receptacle made of a material that admits ambient light to a greater extent than the material forming the plenum such that insects entering the trap follow a path of increasing intensity of ambient light that leads them to the receptacle. In one embodiment, existing carpenter bee nests are treated with a disclosed insecticide gel. The insecticide gel consists of a thixotropic, injectable, non-hardening, non-volatile gel blended with a pyrethroid insecticide, in effect converting the bee nest into a trap.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
19 Feb 2013
Est. expiry
7 Mar 2031
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
A01M1/20
Examiner
ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER P
US8375624B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8375624B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement of their disputes; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: This action, including all complaints, amended complaints, and counterclaims, may and shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further notice or opportunity for a hearing, and without award of costs, fees, or expenses to any party. The parties hereby jointly request that the Court enter an order dismissing this action with prejudice, without award of costs, fees, or expenses to any party.”

Case 2:20-cv-00480 · E.D. Wis. · closed 24 April 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:20-cv-00480?

2:20-cv-00480 is a patent infringement action brought by Brian Robert Blazer against Best Bee Brothers LLC, filed on 25 Mar 2020 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The case closed on 24 April 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 2:20-cv-00480?

USRE46421E1 (“Carpenter bee traps”), assigned to CARPENTER BEE SOLUTIONS, currently active; US8375624B2 (“Carpenter bee traps”), assigned to CARPENTER BEE SOLUTIONS, currently inactive. The record also lists Carpenter bee traps.

How was case 2:20-cv-00480 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is consent judgment. The termination text reads: “WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement of their disputes; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: This action, including all complaints, amended complaints, and counterclaims, may and shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further notice or opportunity for a hearing, and without award of costs, fees, or expenses to any party. The parties hereby jointly request that the Court enter an order dismissing this action with prejudice, without award of costs, fees, or expenses to any party.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 2:20-cv-00480 take?

1125 calendar days, from filing on 25 Mar 2020 to closure on 24 April 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:20-cv-00480?

Chief Judge Brett H Ludwig presided. Christopher A. Honea, Jeremy Adelson, Randall T. Garteiser, Rene A. Vazquez and Thomas G Fasone III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Brian Robert Blazer. James F. Boyle and Michael T. Griggs appear for defendant Best Bee Brothers.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:20-cv-00480 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:20-cv-00480 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.