BlenderBottle Wins Permanent Injunction Against Hydra Cup in Design Patent Dispute
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Trove Brands, LLC (BlenderBottle) v. TRRS Magnate, LLC (Hydra Cup) |
| Case Number | 2:22-cv-02222 (E.D. Cal.) |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Duration | Dec 2022 – Jul 2025 2 years 7 months (957 days) |
| Outcome | Plaintiff Win – Permanent Injunction |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Hydra Cup Shaker Bottles |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Parent company of BlenderBottle, a leader in fitness accessories and drinkware, holding a robust portfolio of design patents and registered trademarks for its shaker bottle designs.
🛡️ Defendant
A competing manufacturer and seller of shaker bottles and fitness drinkware, with products directly overlapping with BlenderBottle’s consumer base.
Patents & Trade Dress at Issue
This landmark case involved three design patents covering fundamental shaker bottle design elements, alongside extensive trade dress claims:
- • U.S. Patent No. USD510,235 — covering a bottle design
- • U.S. Patent No. USD696,551 — covering a bottle lid with integrated handle
- • U.S. Patent No. USD697,798 — covering a container design
- • Common law and registered trade dress rights for bottle form, lid configuration, agitator design, and packaging label.
Designing a similar product?
Check if your shaker bottle design might infringe these or related patents and trade dress.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case closed via **Consent Judgment** with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce compliance. Hydra Cup admitted infringement of all three design patents and all four trade dress elements. No monetary damages figure was publicly disclosed, but Hydra Cup is **permanently enjoined** from manufacturing, selling, or marketing any infringing products or designs confusingly similar to BlenderBottle’s IP, effective September 27, 2025.
Legal Significance
This case reinforces several important doctrines in design patent and trade dress law: Layered IP protection works by combining design patents with both registered and common law trade dress. It confirms that secondary meaning is achievable in consumer goods for distinct design elements. Furthermore, it demonstrates that permanent injunctions remain available in design patent cases resolved by consent, providing patent holders with long-term market protection.
Filing a design patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in shaker bottle design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View all related design patents and trade dress in this space
- See which companies are most active in fitness drinkware design
- Understand claim construction patterns for shaker bottles
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents and trade dress
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Shaker bottle designs with similar overall form, lid, agitator
3 Design Patents + Trade Dress
Asserted in shaker bottle design
Design-Around Options
Available with careful analysis
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Layered IP portfolios combining design patents and trade dress registrations significantly strengthen enforcement leverage.
Search related case law →Consent judgments with admitted infringement findings can serve as strong precedent in follow-on proceedings.
Explore precedents →Injunctions effective on a future date (here, September 27, 2025) allow orderly wind-down while preserving full enforceability.
Explore injunction best practices →For IP Professionals
Trade dress secondary meaning can be established across multiple distinct product elements simultaneously.
Analyze trade dress cases →Supply chain enforcement (third-party manufacturers) may follow product-level IP victories.
Understand enforcement strategies →Retained court jurisdiction over permanent injunctions provides ongoing compliance enforcement tools.
View enforcement options →For R&D Leaders
FTO analysis must include common law trade dress, not just registered patents and trademarks.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Product redesigns should address all asserted design elements — bottle, lid, agitator, and packaging — to avoid “colorably similar” injunction violations.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.