Bright Data v. Code 200: Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Data Communication Patent Appeal
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Bright Data, Ltd. v. Code 200, UAB et al. |
| Case Number | 23-2442 (Fed. Cir.) |
| Court | Federal Circuit, District of Columbia circuit |
| Duration | Sep 2023 – Aug 2025 1 year 11 months |
| Outcome | Defendant Win – Dismissal on Invalidity |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Code 200 Data Communication Systems & Proxy Network Services |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Globally recognized data intelligence and proxy network company, known for its internet infrastructure products that facilitate large-scale data collection and web access.
🛡️ Defendant
Lithuanian-registered entities including Code 200, Coretech Lt, Teso LT, metacluster lt, and Oxysales, UAB, operating in overlapping data services markets.
Patents at Issue
This dispute involved four U.S. patents covering systems designed to deliver faster and more efficient data communication. These patents span a family of related innovations, indicating a deliberate prosecution strategy by Bright Data:
- • US11044344B2 — System for efficient data communication
- • US10484510B2 — Method for optimizing data delivery
- • US10257319B2 — Network routing apparatus
- • US11044342B2 — Distributed data processing system
Developing data communication technology?
Check if your system or product might encounter similar patentability challenges.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Bright Data’s appeal, concluding a 672-day litigation on invalidity/cancellation grounds. This outcome carries significant implications for patent holders in the data services sector.
Key Legal Issues
The case reinforced how appellate courts handle patentability challenges. Issues often involve statutory grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 (patent-eligible subject matter) and 103 (obviousness), especially for software and data communication patents under the *Alice/Mayo* framework. Claim construction sensitivity and multi-patent assertion risk were critical factors.
Filing a data communication patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims for network efficiency and data delivery.
Power Your Patent Strategy with PatSnap Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, PatSnap Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in network routing and data delivery. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View related cases defining patentability in data comms
- See trends in data communication patent prosecution
- Understand claim differentiation strategies
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents, including this family
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Abstract data communication claims
4 Patents at Issue
In this specific litigation
Design-Around Options
Possible with concrete technical implementation
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Federal Circuit affirmance of invalidity on appeal underscores the difficulty of reversing patentability rulings, demanding careful appellate strategy.
Search related case law →Data communication and network technology patents remain highly vulnerable to § 101 and § 103 challenges; claim drafting must emphasize concrete technical solutions.
Explore precedents →For IP Professionals & R&D Teams
FTO analyses in data communication technology must evaluate entire patent families, not isolated patents, for comprehensive risk assessment.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Documenting prior art and technical differentiation thoroughly during product development reduces invalidity exposure in future disputes.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.
📑 Table of Contents
🚀 PatSnap Eureka IP Tools
🔍Novelty Search
Find prior art instantly
Patent Drafting
AI-assisted claim writing
FTO Analysis
Assess infringement risk
Concerned About Your Data Comm Product?
Don’t wait for litigation. Check your product’s freedom to operate now.
Run FTO for My Product⚡ Accelerate Your IP Strategy
Join 15,000+ IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka for patent research and analysis.