Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
BX Led v. RAB Lighting | Patent Lawsuit 3:23-cv-01323

BX Led, LLC v. RAB Lighting, Inc.

3:23-cv-01323 N.D. Tex. Closed 8 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 13 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and closed 1 Sep 2023, with 8 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
3:23-cv-01323
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Jane J Boyle
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
13 Jun 2023 – 1 Sep 2023
Duration
80 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Color temperature tunable white light source · Efficient LED array · Heat sink apparatus for solid state lights · High power AllnGaN based multi-chip light emitting diode · Light emitting diode (LED) lighting device · Light emitting diode with thin multilayer phosphor film · Light sources utilizing segmented LEDs to compensate for manufacturing variations in the light output of individual segmented LEDs
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 3:23-cv-01323, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8203260B2 Active App. US11/787107

Color temperature tunable white light source

A color temperature tunable white light source comprises: first and second LED arrangements operable to emit light of first and second wavelength range respectively that are configured such that their combined light output, which comprises light generated by the source, appears white in color. One or both LED arrangements comprises a phosphor provided remote to an associated LED operable to generate excitation radiation and to irradiate the phosphor such that it emits light of a different wavelength range, wherein the light emitted by the LED arrangement comprises the combined light from the LED and phosphor. The color temperature of output white light is tunable by controlling the relative light outputs of the LED arrangements by for example controlling the relative magnitude of the drive currents of the LEDs or a duty cycle of a pulse width modulated drive current.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
19 Jun 2012
Est. expiry
24 Feb 2029
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H01J1/62H05B44/00F21V9/40
Prosecution counsel
WSGR
Examiner
BECK, ALEXANDER S
US8203260B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8203260B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US10966300B2 Active App. US16/449220

Light sources utilizing segmented LEDs to compensate for manufacturing variations in the light output of individual segmented LEDs

A light source and method for making the same are disclosed. The light source includes a plurality of Segmented LEDs connected in parallel to a power bus and a controller. The power bus accepts a variable number of Segmented LEDs. The controller receives AC power and provides a power signal on the power bus. Each Segmented LED is characterized by a driving voltage that is greater than 3 times the driving voltage of a conventional LED fabricated in the same material system as the Segmented LED. The number of Segmented LEDs in the light source is chosen to compensate for variations in the light output of individual Segmented LEDs introduced by the manufacturing process. In another aspect of the invention, the number of Segmented LEDs connected to the power bus can be altered after the light source is assembled.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
30 Mar 2021
Est. expiry
26 Feb 2029
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H05B45/46H01L33/62H01L25/075H05B45/10H05B45/48H05B45/50H05B47/185H05B33/10H01L27/15H05B44/00
Prosecution counsel
ArentFox Schiff LLP
Examiner
JOHNSON, AMY COHEN
US10966300B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10966300B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff BX LED LLC (“BX” or “Plaintiff”) hereby gives notice that this action is voluntarily dismissed. Defendant RAB Lighting, Inc. (“RAB” or “Defendant”) has not served an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Accordingly, Plaintiff notices voluntary dismissal of this action, without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(B).”

Case 3:23-cv-01323 · N.D. Tex. · closed 1 September 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 3:23-cv-01323?

3:23-cv-01323 is a patent infringement action brought by BX Led, LLC against RAB Lighting, Inc., filed on 13 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The case closed on 1 September 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 3:23-cv-01323?

US8203260B2 (“Color temperature tunable white light source”), assigned to BX LED, LLC, currently active; US10966300B2 (“Light sources utilizing segmented LEDs to compensate for manufacturing variations in the light output of individual segmented LEDs”), assigned to BX LED, LLC, currently active; US7901109B2 (“Heat sink apparatus for solid state lights”), assigned to BX LED, LLC; US7973465B2 (“Light emitting diode with thin multilayer phosphor film”), assigned to BX LED, LLC; US9913333B2 (“Light sources utilizing segmented LEDs to compensate for manufacturing variations in the light output of individual segmented LEDs”), assigned to BX LED, LLC; US6869812B1 (“High power AllnGaN based multi-chip light emitting diode”), assigned to BX LED, LLC; US8143769B2 (“Light emitting diode (LED) lighting device”), assigned to BX LED, LLC; US8567988B2 (“Efficient LED array”), assigned to BX LED, LLC. The record also lists Color temperature tunable white light source, Efficient LED array, Heat sink apparatus for solid state lights, High power AllnGaN based multi-chip light emitting diode, Light emitting diode (LED) lighting device, Light emitting diode with thin multilayer phosphor film and Light sources utilizing segmented LEDs to compensate for manufacturing variations in the light output of individual segmented LEDs.

How was case 3:23-cv-01323 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff BX LED LLC (“BX” or “Plaintiff”) hereby gives notice that this action is voluntarily dismissed. Defendant RAB Lighting, Inc. (“RAB” or “Defendant”) has not served an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Accordingly, Plaintiff notices voluntary dismissal of this action, without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(B).”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 3:23-cv-01323 take?

80 calendar days, from filing on 13 Jun 2023 to closure on 1 September 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:23-cv-01323?

Chief Judge Jane J Boyle presided. Andrew Lin, Matthew C. Acosta and Nicholas C. Kliewer are recorded as counsel for plaintiff BX Led.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 3:23-cv-01323 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:23-cv-01323 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.