Capna IP Capital, LLC v. Helderpad, LLC
Infringement action filed 28 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington and closed 17 Jul 2023, with 2 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US10507407B2US10814248B2
- Case no.
- 3:23-cv-05169
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Wash.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Washington
- Chief judge
- Thomas S. Zilly
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 28 Feb 2023 – 17 Jul 2023
- Duration
- 139 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates
A system, machines and methods for extracting select moieties, flavonoids, and essential oils from plant material without co-extracting chlorophyll lipids and other undesirable constituents from plants. Super-cooled extraction techniques are taught. Likewise, according to embodiments methods provides 100% grain ethyl alcohol extract with a concentration of chlorophyll that is below 1%.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 17 Dec 2019
- Earliest priority
- 14 Apr 2016
- Est. expiry
- 14 Apr 2037
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- GALYUK, YEVGENIY
- Classification
- B01D11/02C11B9/02F25B7/00
- Prosecution counsel
- Patnstr, APC
- Examiner
- CUTLIFF, YATE′ K
Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates
A system, machines and methods for extracting select moieties, flavonoids, and essential oils from plant material without co-extracting chlorophyll, lipids and other undesirable constituents from plants. Super-cooled extraction techniques are taught. Likewise, according to embodiments methods provides 100% grain ethyl alcohol extract with a concentration of chlorophyll that is below 1%.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 27 Oct 2020
- Earliest priority
- 14 Apr 2016
- Est. expiry
- 14 Apr 2037
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- GALYUK, YEVGENIY
- Classification
- B01D11/02F25B7/00C11B9/02C07D311/78
- Prosecution counsel
- Patnstr, APC
- Examiner
- CUTLIFF, YATE′ K
Parties of record
Capna IP Capital, LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- David Allen Lowe · Lawrence D. Graham · R. Scott Rhoades · Sanford E. Warren
- Firm
- Lowe Graham Jones, PLLC, Warren Rhoades, LLP
Helderpad, LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Allen Lowe | Capna IP Capital, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Lawrence D. Graham | Capna IP Capital, LLC | Plaintiff |
| R. Scott Rhoades | Capna IP Capital, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Sanford E. Warren | Capna IP Capital, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Capna IP Capital LLC hereby provides notice of dismissal of this action, without prejudice.”
Case 3:23-cv-05169 · W.D. Wash. · closed 17 July 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 3:23-cv-05169?
3:23-cv-05169 is a patent infringement action brought by Capna IP Capital, LLC against Helderpad, LLC, filed on 28 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The case closed on 17 July 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 3:23-cv-05169?
US10507407B2 (“Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates”), assigned to GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS LLC, currently active; US10814248B2 (“Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates”), assigned to GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS LLC, currently active. The record also lists Methods to reduce chlorophyll co-extraction through extraction of select moieties essential oils and aromatic isolates.
How was case 3:23-cv-05169 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Capna IP Capital LLC hereby provides notice of dismissal of this action, without prejudice.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 3:23-cv-05169 take?
139 calendar days, from filing on 28 Feb 2023 to closure on 17 July 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:23-cv-05169?
Chief Judge Thomas S. Zilly presided. David Allen Lowe, Lawrence D. Graham, R. Scott Rhoades and Sanford E. Warren are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Capna IP Capital.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:23-cv-05169 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.