Carucel Investments, LP v. Volkswagen, AG
Patentability filed 12 Mar 2021 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 26 Dec 2023, with US7848701B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: unpatentable.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US7848701B2
- Application no.
- US11/733069
- Case no.
- 21-1734
- Verdict cause
- Patentability
- Court
- Fed. Cir.
- Court level
- Court of Appeals
- Case region
- District of Columbia
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- Appeal
- Filed – Closed
- 12 Mar 2021 – 26 Dec 2023
- Duration
- 1019 days
- Basis of termination
- Unpatentable
- Products & marks
- Mobile communication system with moving base station
- Validity challenges
- 4 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Mobile communication system with moving base station
A mobile communication system employs moving base stations moving in the direction of flow of traffic moving along a roadway. The moving base station communicates with fixed radio ports connected to a gateway office. A plurality of moving base stations are spaced apart on a closed loop and move with the flow of traffic along one roadway on one leg of the loop and with a flow of traffic on another roadway in another leg of the loop. The moving base stations communicate with a plurality of fixed radio ports connected by a signal transmission link to a gateway office which, in turn, is connected to the wire line network. The moving base stations are each provided with a pair of directional antennas with one antenna directed toward the flow of traffic and another antenna directed to the fixed radio ports.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 7 Dec 2010
- Est. expiry
- 2 Jun 2015
- Validity challenges
- 4 on recordIPR2019-01442 · filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCIPR2019-01102 · Other · filed by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.IPR2019-01102 · Patentability · filed by CARUCEL INVESTMENTS L.PIPR2019-01442 · Patentability · filed by CARUCEL INVESTMENTS L.P
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- GAVRILOVICH, CHARLES D.
- Classification
- H04B7/15H04W88/02
- Examiner
- TRAN, TUAN A
Parties of record
Carucel Investments, LP
- Core tech
- H04B7/15H04W88/02
- Counsel
- R. Scott Rhoades
- Firm
- Warren Rhoades LLP
Volkswagen, AG
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Ryan Charles Richardson
- Firm
- Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| R. Scott Rhoades | Carucel Investments, LP | Plaintiff |
| Ryan Charles Richardson | Volkswagen, AG | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED”
Case 21-1734 · Fed. Cir. · closed 26 December 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 21-1734?
21-1734 is a patent patentability brought by Carucel Investments, LP against Volkswagen, AG, filed on 12 Mar 2021 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 26 December 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 21-1734?
US7848701B2 (“Mobile communication system with moving base station”), assigned to CARUCEL INVESTMENTS, L.P., currently inactive. The record also lists Mobile communication system with moving base station.
How was case 21-1734 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is unpatentable. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED”
How long did case 21-1734 take?
1019 calendar days, from filing on 12 Mar 2021 to closure on 26 December 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 21-1734?
R. Scott Rhoades is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Carucel Investments, LP. Ryan Charles Richardson appears for defendant Volkswagen.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 21-1734 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.