Celgene vs. Deva: Pomalidomide Patent Injunction Secured in 22 Days

📄 View Full Report 📥 Export PDF 🔗 Share ⭐ Save

Case Overview

The Parties

⚖️ Plaintiff

Wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb and NDA holder for Pomalyst® (pomalidomide), a blockbuster multiple myeloma treatment.

🛡️ Defendant

Turkish pharmaceutical manufacturer with active U.S. market ambitions, filed ANDA No. 22-0237 for generic pomalidomide.

The Patents at Issue

This landmark case involved three U.S. patents constituting the Patents-in-Suit, which form a layered IP fortress around pomalidomide:

🧪

Developing a generic drug?

Check if your generic formulation might infringe these or related patents.

Run FTO Check →

The Verdict & Legal Analysis

Outcome

On August 14, 2025, the District of New Jersey entered a Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction by stipulation of both parties. The injunction prohibits Deva — including all successors and assigns — from infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,828,427; 9,993,467; and 10,555,939 by making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, or distributing the Deva ANDA Product until expiration of the Patents-in-Suit.

Legal Significance

The 22-day resolution is particularly notable. The consent judgment explicitly preserves Deva’s Paragraph IV certification rights and its research exemption protections. Equally significant: the judgment does not restrict FDA from ultimately approving ANDA No. 22-0237. This indicates a pragmatic capitulation tied to litigation cost-benefit analysis rather than a substantive concession on patent merits.

🧬

Filing a pharmaceutical patent?

Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims covering composition, method-of-treatment, and formulation.

Try Patent Drafting →

Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP

From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.

⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis for Pomalidomide

This case highlights critical IP risks in pharmaceutical ANDA development. Choose your next step:

📋 Understand This Case’s Impact

Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation for generic pharma.

  • View all related patents in this therapeutic area
  • See key competitors in pomalidomide IP
  • Understand ANDA litigation trends and strategies
📊 View Patent Landscape
⚠️
High Risk Area

Generic Pomalidomide Formulations

📋
3 Patents-in-Suit

Layered IP protection around Pomalyst®

Strategy Insights

For ANDA filers & pharmaceutical innovators

✅ Key Takeaways

For Patent Attorneys & Litigators

Multi-patent portfolio strategies (composition, method-of-treatment, formulation) provide robust protection in Hatch-Waxman litigation.

Search related case law →

Rapid consent judgments can be secured when generic challengers face strong patent positions and experienced counsel.

Explore precedents →

For R&D Teams (Pharmaceutical)

Conduct thorough, layered FTO analysis covering all patent types before ANDA investment and development.

Start FTO analysis for my product →

Monitor patent expiry timelines for all relevant patents, not just primary composition patents, for safe generic entry windows.

Try AI patent drafting →

Ready to Strengthen Your Pharmaceutical Patent Strategy?

Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.

⚖️ Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The analysis presented reflects publicly available case information and general legal principles regarding pharmaceutical patent litigation. For specific advice regarding ANDA litigation, FTO analysis, or pharmaceutical IP strategy, please consult a qualified patent attorney.