Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic, Corp. et al.
Infringement action filed 22 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 3 Oct 2023, with 6 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Case record
- Case no.
- 2:23-cv-00227
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- E.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 22 May 2023 – 3 Oct 2023
- Duration
- 134 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed with Prejudice
- Products & marks
- Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
Disclosed herein is a method and system for utilizing a digital data capture device in conjunction with a Bluetooth (BT) enabled mobile device for publishing data and multimedia content on one or more websites automatically or with minimal user intervention. A client application is provided on the BT enabled mobile device. In the absence of inbuilt BT capability, a BT communication device is provided on the digital data capture device. The BT communication device is paired with the BT enabled mobile device to establish a connection. The client application detects capture of data and multimedia content on the digital data capture device and initiates transfer of the captured data, multimedia content, and associated files. The digital data capture device transfers the captured data, multimedia content, and the associated files to the client application. The client application automatically publishes the transferred data and multimedia content on one or more websites.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 25 Nov 2014
- Earliest priority
- 28 Dec 2007
- Est. expiry
- 11 Dec 2028
- Validity challenges
- 2 on recordIPR2024-00760 · Patentability · filed by TikTok Inc.90019489 · EPR
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- SINGH, GURVINDER · KLEIN, MARCOS · LAVIANO, VINCE
- Classification
- G06F15/16H04W4/80
- Examiner
- NOORISTANY, SULAIMAN
Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
Disclosed herein is a method and system for utilizing a digital data capture device in conjunction with a Bluetooth (BT) enabled mobile device for publishing data and multimedia content on one or more websites automatically or with minimal user intervention. A client application is provided on the BT enabled mobile device. In the absence of inbuilt BT capability, a BT communication device is provided on the digital data capture device. The BT communication device is paired with the BT enabled mobile device to establish a connection. The client application detects capture of data and multimedia content on the digital data capture device and initiates transfer of the captured data, multimedia content, and associated files. The digital data capture device transfers the captured data, multimedia content, and the associated files to the client application. The client application automatically publishes the transferred data and multimedia content on one or more websites.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 25 Jan 2022
- Earliest priority
- 28 Dec 2007
- Est. expiry
- 11 Dec 2028
- Validity challenges
- 2 on recordIPR2025-00102 · Patentability · filed by Lifescan, Inc.IPR2024-00768 · Patentability · filed by TIKTOK INC.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- SINGH, GURVINDER · KLEIN, MARCOS · LAVIANO, VINCE
- Classification
- G06F16/958H04W8/24H04W4/80H04W76/10H04W12/033H04W12/50H04L29/06H04L29/08H04B7/26H04L7/00H04L12/939G06F3/0482H04W12/04H04W84/18H04W12/61H04W12/02
- Examiner
- NOORISTANY, SULAIMAN
Also asserted in this case
4 moreThe docket lists 6 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 4 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
- US10425806B2Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
- US8862757B2Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
- US8756336B2Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
- US9900766B2Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content
Parties of record
Cellspin Soft, Inc.
- Core tech
- G06F15/16H04W4/80G06F16/958H04W8/24
- Counsel
- Randall T. Garteiser
- Firm
- Garteiser Honea PLLC
Panasonic, Corp.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
- Also named
- Panasonic Holdings Corporation · Panasonic Corporation of North America
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Randall T. Garteiser | Cellspin Soft, Inc. | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (“Notice”) filed by Cellspin Soft, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 11). In the Notice, Plaintiff represents that the above-captioned case is voluntarily dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (Id. at 1). In light of the Notice, which the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the abovecaptioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain. . ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of October, 2023.”
Case 2:23-cv-00227 · E.D. Tex. · closed 3 October 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 2:23-cv-00227?
2:23-cv-00227 is a patent infringement action brought by Cellspin Soft, Inc. against Panasonic, Corp., filed on 22 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 3 October 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 2:23-cv-00227?
US8898260B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC., currently active; US11234121B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC., currently active; US10425806B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC.; US8862757B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC.; US8756336B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC.; US9900766B2 (“Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content”), assigned to CELLSPINSOFT INC.. The record also lists Automatic multimedia upload for publishing data and multimedia content.
How was case 2:23-cv-00227 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (“Notice”) filed by Cellspin Soft, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 11). In the Notice, Plaintiff represents that the above-captioned case is voluntarily dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (Id. at 1). In light of the Notice, which the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the abovecaptioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE t
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 2:23-cv-00227 take?
134 calendar days, from filing on 22 May 2023 to closure on 3 October 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00227?
Randall T. Garteiser is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Cellspin Soft.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00227 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.