Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC v. CPI Security, Inc.
Infringement action filed 7 Sep 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and closed 22 Sep 2023, with US8909779B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8909779B2
- Application no.
- US13/280254
- Case no.
- 1:23-cv-03994
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- N.D. Ga.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Georgia
- Chief judge
- Leigh Martin May
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 7 Sep 2023 – 22 Sep 2023
- Duration
- 15 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Operates, and administers systems, products, and services for enabling a method for controlling an environment
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections
A system and method for control and monitoring of devices and inter-device connections located within an environment using a control client is provided. A user creates commands via the control client to a server that maintains a representation of the environment and the devices within the environment. The server utilizes a set of policies associated with the devices to control the devices in a default manner. The user can modify or use exceptions from the policies to achieve specific tasks other than the default tasks associated with the policy. The server may further monitor and report the current states of the devices in the environment and historical changes of the devices to monitor the environment and provide reporting for such tasks such as environment monitoring.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 9 Dec 2014
- Earliest priority
- 8 Sep 2006
- Est. expiry
- 16 Jan 2028
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record90015264 · EPR
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Classification
- H04L29/08H04L12/24G05B15/00H04N7/15H04N21/436H04N21/442H04L29/00H04L12/28G05B15/02G06F15/173
- Prosecution counsel
- Ramey LLP
- Examiner
- IBRAHIM, MOHAMED
Parties of record
Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC
- Core tech
- H04L29/08H04L12/24G05B15/00H04N7/15
- Counsel
- Jeffrey Kubiak · William P. Ramey III
- Firm
- Ramey LLP
CPI Security, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Kubiak | Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
| William P. Ramey III | Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Clerk’s Entry ofDismissalAPPROVING8 Notice ofVoluntaryDismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(i)”
Case 1:23-cv-03994 · N.D. Ga. · closed 22 September 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:23-cv-03994?
1:23-cv-03994 is a patent infringement action brought by Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC against CPI Security, Inc., filed on 7 Sep 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The case closed on 22 September 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 1:23-cv-03994?
US8909779B2 (“System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections”), assigned to CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO IP LLC, currently active. The record also lists Operates, and administers systems, products, and services for enabling a method for controlling an environment.
How was case 1:23-cv-03994 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Clerk’s Entry ofDismissalAPPROVING8 Notice ofVoluntaryDismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(i)”
What does voluntary dismissal mean?
A voluntary dismissal is one the plaintiff asks for rather than one the court imposes. Where both sides stipulate to it, it commonly signals a settlement that is not filed on the public docket.
How long did case 1:23-cv-03994 take?
15 calendar days, from filing on 7 Sep 2023 to closure on 22 September 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-03994?
Chief Judge Leigh Martin May presided. Jeffrey Kubiak and William P. Ramey III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Cloud Systems Holdco IP.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-03994 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.