Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC v. Bosch Security Systems, LLC
Infringement action filed 2 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and closed 30 Aug 2023, with US8909779B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8909779B2
- Application no.
- US13/280254
- Case no.
- 0:23-cv-61040
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- S.D. Fla.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Florida
- Chief judge
- Rodney Smith
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 2 Jun 2023 – 30 Aug 2023
- Duration
- 89 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections
A system and method for control and monitoring of devices and inter-device connections located within an environment using a control client is provided. A user creates commands via the control client to a server that maintains a representation of the environment and the devices within the environment. The server utilizes a set of policies associated with the devices to control the devices in a default manner. The user can modify or use exceptions from the policies to achieve specific tasks other than the default tasks associated with the policy. The server may further monitor and report the current states of the devices in the environment and historical changes of the devices to monitor the environment and provide reporting for such tasks such as environment monitoring.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 9 Dec 2014
- Earliest priority
- 8 Sep 2006
- Est. expiry
- 16 Jan 2028
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record90015264 · EPR
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Classification
- H04L29/08H04L12/24G05B15/00H04N7/15H04N21/436H04N21/442H04L29/00H04L12/28G05B15/02G06F15/173
- Prosecution counsel
- Ramey LLP
- Examiner
- IBRAHIM, MOHAMED
Parties of record
Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC
- Core tech
- H04L29/08H04L12/24G05B15/00H04N7/15
- Counsel
- Victoria Elisabeth Brieant
- Firm
- Law Office of Victoria E. Brieant
Bosch Security Systems, LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Lionel M. Lavenue
- Firm
- Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Victoria Elisabeth Brieant | Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Lionel M. Lavenue | Bosch Security Systems, LLC | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice [DE 16]. Accordingly, it is hereby, ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 4. This case is CLOSED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 30th day of August, 2023.”
Case 0:23-cv-61040 · S.D. Fla. · closed 30 August 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 0:23-cv-61040?
0:23-cv-61040 is a patent infringement action brought by Cloud Systems Holdco IP, LLC against Bosch Security Systems, LLC, filed on 2 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case closed on 30 August 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 0:23-cv-61040?
US8909779B2 (“System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections”), assigned to CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO IP LLC, currently active. The record also lists System and method for control and monitoring of multiple devices and inter-device connections.
How was case 0:23-cv-61040 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice [DE 16]. Accordingly, it is hereby, ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 4. This case is CLOSED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 30th day of August, 2023.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 0:23-cv-61040 take?
89 calendar days, from filing on 2 Jun 2023 to closure on 30 August 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 0:23-cv-61040?
Chief Judge Rodney Smith presided. Victoria Elisabeth Brieant is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Cloud Systems Holdco IP. Lionel M. Lavenue appears for defendant Bosch Security Systems.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 0:23-cv-61040 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.