Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
ContactWave v. Spotify USA | Patent Lawsuit 1:26-cv-00262

ContactWave LLC v. Spotify USA

1:26-cv-00262 D. Del. Closed US9531665B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 11 Mar 2026 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and closed 12 May 2026, with US9531665B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US9531665B2
Application no.
US14/618541
Case no.
1:26-cv-00262
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
D. Del.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Delaware
Chief judge
Jennifer L. Hall
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
11 Mar 2026 – 12 May 2026
Duration
62 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed with Prejudice
Products & marks
Information messaging system
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:26-cv-00262, United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US9531665B2 Inactive App. US14/618541

Information messaging system

A method of transmitting contact information to an approved mobile communication device includes receiving an input representative of desired contact information located on a first web page and an input representative of the identity of a desired mobile communication device. The method also includes saving information representative of the desired contact information in a contact information database. The method also includes determining whether the desired mobile communication device is an approved device and transmitting to the desired mobile communication device information representative of a notification to send the information representative of the desired contact information. The method also includes receiving an input from the desired mobile communication device information representative of an acceptance to receive the information representative of the desired contact information, and transmitting to the desired mobile communication device information representative of the desired contact information.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
27 Dec 2016
Est. expiry
4 Sep 2027
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04M3/42H04L29/12G06Q30/06H04M1/2745H04M3/493H04W8/18H04M1/27453H04M1/2757
Prosecution counsel
JDM Patent Law PLLC
Examiner
VU, MICHAEL T
US9531665B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US9531665B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Brian E. LutnessContactWave LLCPlaintiff
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff ContactWave LLC pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims by Plaintiff against Defendant Spotify USA Inc. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. No party has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action.”

Case 1:26-cv-00262 · D. Del. · closed 12 May 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:26-cv-00262?

1:26-cv-00262 is a patent infringement action brought by ContactWave LLC against Spotify USA, filed on 11 Mar 2026 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case closed on 12 May 2026.

Which patent was asserted in 1:26-cv-00262?

US9531665B2 (“Information messaging system”), assigned to CONTACTWAVE LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Information messaging system.

How was case 1:26-cv-00262 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff ContactWave LLC pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims by Plaintiff against Defendant Spotify USA Inc. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. No party has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 1:26-cv-00262 take?

62 calendar days, from filing on 11 Mar 2026 to closure on 12 May 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:26-cv-00262?

Chief Judge Jennifer L. Hall presided. Brian E. Lutness is recorded as counsel for plaintiff ContactWave.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:26-cv-00262 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:26-cv-00262 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.