12 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 12
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- Not recorded
- Judge seen
- James E. Boasberg · Tanya S. Chutkan · Richard J Leon · Christopher R. Cooper · Beryl A. Howell · Rudolph Contreras · Timothy J. Kelly
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:26-cv-01688 | Craig A. Breed v. Donald Trump | Columbia District Court | 18 May 2026 | 29 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 1:25-cv-01945 | Shenzhen Mammotion Innovation Co., Ltd. v. Futuregen Technologies Inc. | Columbia District Court | 20 Jun 2025 | 129 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:25-cv-01681 | H.s. Treasure Contacts Ltd v. Bereal Sas | Columbia District Court | 27 May 2025 | 336 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:25-cv-00945 | BTL Industries, Inc. v. Your Sculpt Studio, LLC | Columbia District Court | 31 Mar 2025 | 191 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:24-cv-03295 | Peter Christian Hessing-Roper v. Commissioner For Patents | Columbia District Court | 15 Nov 2024 | 245 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:24-mc-00004 | Minka Lighting, LLC v. Wangs Alliance, Corp. | Columbia District Court | 19 Jan 2024 | 131 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:24-cv-00133 | Factor 2 Multimedia Systems, LLC v. Tiktok, Inc. | Columbia District Court | 16 Jan 2024 | 531 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:23-cv-02758 | Rowland J. Martin Jr. v. United States of America | Columbia District Court | 18 Sep 2023 | 497 d | Case Dismissed |
| 1:23-cv-01190 | Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Arigna Technology Limited | Columbia District Court | 28 Apr 2023 | 501 d | Case Dismissed |
| 1:23-cv-00504 | John Jackson v. Wal-mart Stores, Inc. | Columbia District Court | 24 Feb 2023 | 77 d | Consent Judgment |
| 1:23-cv-00509 | John Jackson v. Marklyn Group, Inc. | Columbia District Court | 24 Feb 2023 | 77 d | Consent Judgment |
| 1:19-cv-03239 | James L. Driessen v. Walmart, Inc. | Columbia District Court | 28 Oct 2019 | 1282 d | Consent Judgment |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.