26 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 26
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- District of Oregon
- Judge seen
- Michael W. Mosman · Youlee Yim You · Amy E. Potter · Karin J. Immergut · Michael H. Simon · Stacie F. Beckerman · Amy M. Baggio · Adrienne Nelson · Jeff Armistead · Michael J. McShane · Jolie A. Russo · Mustafa T. Kasubhai
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3:25-cv-02019 | Bulk Natural, LLC v. Abstrax Tech Inc. | D. Or. | 31 Oct 2025 | 33 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:25-cv-01796 | Alexander Erlandsson v. Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. | D. Or. | 2 Oct 2025 | 92 d | Closed |
| 3:25-cv-01232 | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC v. Milestone Systems | D. Or. | 14 Jul 2025 | 296 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:25-cv-00876 | Jamaal Russ v. Nike | D. Or. | 22 May 2025 | 82 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:25-cv-00866 | WaveCel, LLC v. Studson, Inc. | D. Or. | 21 May 2025 | 229 d | Closed |
| 3:24-cv-02014 | Yakima Products v. Thule Sweden, AB | D. Or. | 3 Dec 2024 | 315 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:24-cv-01764 | Pizza Pack, LLC v. Target, Corp. | D. Or. | 18 Oct 2024 | 292 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-01436 | Knix Wear Inc. v. Diva International Inc. | D. Or. | 29 Aug 2024 | 95 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-01181 | Pizza Pack, LLC v. William J Carty | D. Or. | 19 Jul 2024 | 306 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 3:24-cv-00796 | SawStop Holding, LLC v. Felder KG | D. Or. | 14 May 2024 | 78 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:24-cv-00556 | Ernst Manufacturing, Inc. v. Toolbox Widget Inc. | D. Or. | 2 Apr 2024 | 177 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 3:24-cv-00316 | Savannah Intellectual Property, LLC v. H2ome Certified, Inc. | D. Or. | 20 Feb 2024 | 716 d | Closed |
| 6:23-cv-01829 | Vita-herb Nutriceuticals v. Lonza | D. Or. | 6 Dec 2023 | 468 d | Case Transferred |
| 3:23-cv-01742 | Future Motion, Inc. v. Tony Lai | D. Or. | 27 Nov 2023 | 575 d | Default Judgment |
| 3:23-cv-00914 | VerTerra, Ltd. v. Dtocs, LLC | D. Or. | 22 Jun 2023 | 258 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:23-cv-00493 | A-dec, Inc. v. DCI International, LLC | D. Or. | 5 Apr 2023 | 84 d | Case Dismissed |
| 3:22-cv-01903 | Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ampere Computing, LLC | D. Or. | 8 Dec 2022 | 62 d | Consent Judgment |
| 3:22-cv-01837 | Rothschild Patent Imaging, LLC v. BeFunky, Inc. | D. Or. | 23 Nov 2022 | 93 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:22-cv-01542 | Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Lattice Semiconductor, Corp. | D. Or. | 13 Oct 2022 | 113 d | Consent Judgment |
| 3:22-cv-01544 | Ventum, LLC v. Pierer Mobility, AG | D. Or. | 13 Oct 2022 | 105 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:22-cv-01435 | Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ampere Computing, LLC | D. Or. | 22 Sep 2022 | 137 d | Consent Judgment |
| 3:22-cv-01280 | Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ampere Computing, LLC | D. Or. | 26 Aug 2022 | 164 d | Consent Judgment |
| 3:22-cv-00527 | Smith's Consumer Products, Inc. v. Gourmet Man, LLC | D. Or. | 7 Apr 2022 | 694 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-02284 | Novoluto, GmbH v. Uccellini, Inc. | D. Or. | 31 Dec 2020 | 972 d | Default Judgment |
| 6:17-cv-01685 | ADASA, Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corp. | D. Or. | 24 Oct 2017 | 2093 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 3:17-cv-00623 | Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Ventex Co., Ltd. | D. Or. | 20 Apr 2017 | 2393 d | Default Judgment |
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases recorded in Oregon District Court.
Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court10,000 free credits to start
D. Or.
Map this dispute space
- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.