24 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 24
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- District of South Carolina
- Judge seen
- David C. Norton · Mary G. Lewis · Timothy M. Cain · Donald C Coggins Jr · Cameron MC. Gowan Currie · Joseph F Anderson Jr · Jacquelyn D Austin · Bruce Howe Hendricks · Sherri A Lydon · Joseph Dawson III
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:25-cv-12610 | Keller North America, Inc. v. Earth Tech, LLC | D.S.C. | 17 Sep 2025 | 128 d | Closed |
| 0:25-cv-12423 | Jameson, LLC v. Shanghaijialeshiyeyouxiangongsi | D.S.C. | 9 Sep 2025 | 10 d | Consent Judgment |
| 7:25-cv-12369 | Dell-Corning Corporation v. Polywrap Recycling Inc | D.S.C. | 8 Sep 2025 | 260 d | Case Dismissed |
| 0:25-cv-08212 | Jameson, LLC v. Dongguanshizeyuwangluokejiyouxiangongsi | D.S.C. | 23 Jul 2025 | 29 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 0:25-cv-06882 | Jameson, LLC v. feimiershagnhaimaoyifazhanyouxianzerengongsi | D.S.C. | 8 Jul 2025 | 6 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 8:25-cv-01988 | Vita-herb Nutriceuticals v. Lonza | D.S.C. | 18 Mar 2025 | 251 d | Case Dismissed |
| 7:25-cv-00302 | baier & michels GmbH & Co KG v. Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc | D.S.C. | 16 Jan 2025 | 481 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 0:24-cv-06915 | Jameson, LLC v. dongguanshiyifengjinshuzhipinyouxiangongsi | D.S.C. | 26 Nov 2024 | 10 d | Consent Judgment |
| 0:24-cv-05108 | Linfo IP, LLC v. Fast Growing Trees, LLC | D.S.C. | 16 Sep 2024 | 115 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 7:24-cv-04529 | Vdpp, LLC v. Honey Optics LLC | D.S.C. | 16 Aug 2024 | 200 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:24-cv-04453 | Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc v. baier & michels GmbH & Co KG | D.S.C. | 14 Aug 2024 | 636 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:23-cv-05890 | Palmetto State Armory, LLC v. Shield Arms, LLC | D.S.C. | 16 Nov 2023 | 649 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 6:23-cv-05113 | Medisca Pharmaceutique, Inc. v. Flacktek, Inc. | D.S.C. | 12 Oct 2023 | 568 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 7:23-cv-04368 | Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Fujikura America, Inc. | D.S.C. | 30 Aug 2023 | 224 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:23-cv-03924 | Slick Slide, LLC v. Dustin Pelletier | D.S.C. | 9 Aug 2023 | 294 d | Case Settled |
| 6:23-cv-02559 | Buergofol GMBH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc. | D.S.C. | 8 Jun 2023 | 196 d | Case Transferred |
| 6:23-cv-01040 | NuVinAir, LLC v. Robert Goldberg | D.S.C. | 14 Mar 2023 | 73 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 2:22-cv-04443 | BelAir Electronics, Inc. v. Twelve South, LLC | D.S.C. | 8 Dec 2022 | 470 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:22-cv-00137 | Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Nephron SC, Inc. | D.S.C. | 14 Jan 2022 | 360 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 5:22-cv-00098 | Th Products, LLC v. WM Carolina, LLC | D.S.C. | 11 Jan 2022 | 371 d | Case Settled |
| 7:21-cv-02107 | Robert Bosch, GmbH v. Delta Power Equipment Corporation | D.S.C. | 14 Jul 2021 | 544 d | Case Settled |
| 7:21-cv-00727 | XODUS MEDICAL, Inc. v. Mark Mullen | D.S.C. | 12 Mar 2021 | 1770 d | Closed |
| 7:21-cv-00408 | Power Concepts, LLC v. Walmart, Inc. | D.S.C. | 9 Feb 2021 | 1030 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 6:21-cv-00244 | Larry Golden v. Google, LLC | D.S.C. | 26 Jan 2021 | 813 d | Case Dismissed |
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases recorded in South Carolina District Court.
Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court10,000 free credits to start
D.S.C.
Map this dispute space
- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.