12 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 12
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- District of Wyoming
- Judge seen
- Not recorded
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:26-cv-00018 | Abc IP LLC v. Peak Tactical LLC | D. Wyo. | 15 Jan 2026 | 158 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:25-cv-00124 | Abc IP LLC v. FRT Triggers LLC | D. Wyo. | 16 May 2025 | 25 d | Injunction Granted |
| 1:24-cv-00189 | Axcess Global Sciences, LLC v. Vital Health International LLC | D. Wyo. | 23 Sep 2024 | 182 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:24-cv-00082 | Axcess Global Sciences, LLC v. Vitalux Inc | D. Wyo. | 19 Apr 2024 | 405 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:23-cv-00023 | Avus Holdings, LLC v. DMoose Enterprises, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 31 Jan 2023 | 248 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 2:22-cv-00191 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00192 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00194 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00195 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00196 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00197 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Zerify, Inc. | D. Wyo. | 9 Sep 2022 | 181 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:22-cv-00107 | Axcess Global Sciences, LLC v. Balboa Wholesale, LLC | D. Wyo. | 9 May 2022 | 241 d | Injunction Granted |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.