12 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 12
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- Eastern District of Tennessee
- Judge seen
- Debra C Poplin
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:25-cv-00389 | Abc IP LLC v. Timothy Hoffman | E.D. Tenn. | 23 Dec 2025 | 112 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:25-cv-00371 | Shaw Integrated and Turf Solutions, Inc. v. Tuftco Corporation | E.D. Tenn. | 12 Dec 2025 | 77 d | Closed |
| 3:25-cv-00530 | Lippert Components, Inc. v. Apex Custom Furniture, LLC | E.D. Tenn. | 30 Oct 2025 | 238 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:25-cv-00285 | Xodus Medical v. Eagle Health LLC | E.D. Tenn. | 19 Jun 2025 | 99 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:25-cv-00004 | Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Cedar Electronics Holdings Corporation | E.D. Tenn. | 3 Jan 2025 | 318 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:24-cv-00261 | Kimberbell Kids L.L.C. v. Rnk, LLC | E.D. Tenn. | 11 Jun 2024 | 675 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:23-cv-00405 | Ear Technology Corporation v. Hearx Group (pty), Ltd. | E.D. Tenn. | 10 Nov 2023 | 119 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:23-cv-00401 | Plum Laboratories, Inc. v. Rcn Communications, LLC | E.D. Tenn. | 8 Nov 2023 | 300 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:21-cv-00079 | Zeco, LLC v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. | E.D. Tenn. | 15 Apr 2021 | 1210 d | Case Dismissed |
| 3:19-cv-00120 | North Star Technology International Limited v. Latham Pool Products, Inc. | E.D. Tenn. | 11 Apr 2019 | 1517 d | Case Dismissed |
| 1:18-cv-00118 | Pac-Tec, Inc. v. I.C.E. Service Group, Inc. | E.D. Tenn. | 1 Jun 2018 | 1684 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:14-cv-02590 | Usco, Spa v. ValuePart, Inc. | E.D. Tenn. | 30 Jul 2014 | 3730 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.