12 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 12
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- Northern District of Alabama
- Judge seen
- Annemarie Carney Axon · Edmund G LaCour Jr · Anna M Manasco · Madeline Hughes Haikala · Liles C Burke · Corey L Maze · Nicholas A Danella · R David Proctor
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6:25-cv-01628 | Screenco Systems, LLC v. Brett Jean | N.D. Ala. | 24 Sep 2025 | 246 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:25-cv-00595 | Digitaldoors, Inc. v. SouthPoint Bank | N.D. Ala. | 18 Apr 2025 | 348 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:23-cv-01710 | Screenco Systems, LLC v. City Of Cordova | N.D. Ala. | 18 Dec 2023 | 403 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:23-cv-01544 | Vertos Medical, Inc. v. Folsom Metal Products, Inc. | N.D. Ala. | 14 Nov 2023 | 374 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:23-cv-01453 | BTL Industries Inc v. C-luxe, SPA | N.D. Ala. | 26 Oct 2023 | 249 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 5:23-cv-01327 | Commworks Solutions, Inc. v. Adtran, Inc. | N.D. Ala. | 3 Oct 2023 | 204 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:23-cv-00343 | Davinci Lock, LLC v. SpiderDoor, LLC | N.D. Ala. | 17 Mar 2023 | 782 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:23-cv-00265 | McWane, Inc. v. Locket IP, LLC | N.D. Ala. | 2 Mar 2023 | 61 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:22-cv-01565 | Amy J. Reisinger v. Curtis E. Harper | N.D. Ala. | 15 Dec 2022 | 131 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:22-cv-01395 | Twenty-Six Designs, LLC v. Guntersville Breathables, Inc. | N.D. Ala. | 1 Nov 2022 | 357 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:22-cv-00166 | Marc Kapsalis v. Dean Sicking | N.D. Ala. | 8 Feb 2022 | 350 d | Case Settled |
| 5:21-cv-00690 | Correct Transmission, LLC v. Adtran, Inc. | N.D. Ala. | 18 May 2021 | 1820 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.