10 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 10
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- Southern District of Iowa
- Judge seen
- Helen C. Adams
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3:25-cv-00068 | CAT Scale Company v. TruckPay, Inc. | S.D. Iowa | 12 Jun 2025 | 166 d | Case Transferred |
| 4:25-cv-00154 | Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Evergy Kansas Central, Inc. | S.D. Iowa | 28 Apr 2025 | 149 d | Case Transferred |
| 4:25-cv-00046 | Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Evergy Metro, Inc. | S.D. Iowa | 6 Feb 2025 | 230 d | Case Transferred |
| 4:25-cv-00037 | Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. PacifiCorp | S.D. Iowa | 31 Jan 2025 | 487 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 4:24-cv-00243 | Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. MidAmerican Energy Company | S.D. Iowa | 17 Jul 2024 | 464 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 4:24-cv-00055 | FMC Technologies, Inc. v. Albaugh, LLC | S.D. Iowa | 12 Feb 2024 | 280 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 3:22-cv-00076 | Nuhn Industries, Ltd. v. Bazooka Farmstar LLC | S.D. Iowa | 8 Nov 2022 | 158 d | Case Terminated |
| 3:22-cv-00010 | Richard Gramm v. Deere & Co. | S.D. Iowa | 23 Feb 2022 | 706 d | Judgment on the merits for Defendant |
| 4:21-cv-00224 | Superior Industries, Inc. v. Precision, Inc. | S.D. Iowa | 23 Jul 2021 | 1172 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:20-cv-00014 | Jean Friesen v. Harvest International, Inc. | S.D. Iowa | 16 Apr 2020 | 2238 d | Case Transferred |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.