42 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 42
- Court level
- District Court
- District
- Western District of Pennsylvania
- Judge seen
- J. Nicholas Ranjan · W. Scott Hardy · William S. Stickman · Marilyn J. Horan · Stephanie L. Haines · Christy Criswell Wiegand · Cathy Bissoon · Mark R. Hornak · Kai N. Scott · John F Murphy · Joy Flowers Conti · Robert J. Colville · Arthur J. Schwab · Cynthia Reed Eddy · Kelley Brisbon Hodge
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:26-cv-00036 | Panovision LLC v. Maronda Homes, LLC | W.D. Pa. | 9 Jan 2026 | 55 d | Closed |
| 2:25-cv-01975 | Dongguan Tesimai Electronic Technology Co., Ltd v. Schedule A Defendants | W.D. Pa. | 18 Dec 2025 | 174 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:25-cv-01951 | Kundian Guo v. Schedule A Defendants | W.D. Pa. | 15 Dec 2025 | 24 d | Closed |
| 2:25-cv-01815 | Shiwen Chen v. Schedule A Defendants | W.D. Pa. | 21 Nov 2025 | 32 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:25-cv-00283 | Affordable Wire Management, LLC v. Cambria County Association for the Blind and Handicapped, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 3 Sep 2025 | 41 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00769 | Changchun Li v. Tianwide | W.D. Pa. | 5 Jun 2025 | 106 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00615 | Qianming Fu v. Allriver-Direct | W.D. Pa. | 6 May 2025 | 142 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:25-cv-00114 | Apexturbo LLC v. Apex Diesel | W.D. Pa. | 5 May 2025 | 176 d | Other |
| 2:25-cv-00547 | 4c's Spray Equipment Rental, LLC v. Rooftop Equipment, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 23 Apr 2025 | 96 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00321 | Dongguan Deego Trading Co., Ltd v. Junyao-Us | W.D. Pa. | 4 Mar 2025 | 62 d | Case Transferred |
| 2:25-cv-00228 | Dongguan Tesimai Electronic Technology Co., Ltd v. ampm1 | W.D. Pa. | 18 Feb 2025 | 274 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:25-cv-00144 | Xiaobing Wang v. Gua Jie | W.D. Pa. | 30 Jan 2025 | 278 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:24-cv-01772 | Mathews Archery, Inc. v. Viper Sights, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 31 Dec 2024 | 171 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:24-cv-01643 | Fengwei Shu v. Grand Di | W.D. Pa. | 11 Dec 2024 | 168 d | Case Settled |
| 2:24-cv-01653 | Michelle E. de Sousa v. Smart726 | W.D. Pa. | 10 Dec 2024 | 441 d | Closed |
| 2:24-cv-01601 | Lkrb Industries, LLC v. xuzhouaiyaxundianzishangwuyouxiangongsi | W.D. Pa. | 22 Nov 2024 | 376 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:24-cv-01518 | Michelle E. de Sousa v. Moon Bay | W.D. Pa. | 12 Nov 2024 | 204 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:24-cv-01407 | Airigan Solutions, LLC v. Morning Chef | W.D. Pa. | 8 Oct 2024 | 182 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:24-cv-02689 | Theravance Biopharma R & D IP, LLC v. Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | W.D. Pa. | 18 Jun 2024 | 97 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:24-cv-00691 | Buckingham Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Bashlin Industries, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 8 May 2024 | 184 d | Case Settled |
| 1:24-cv-00011 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Emsco, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 12 Jan 2024 | 299 d | Case Stayed |
| 2:24-cv-00048 | XMARK Corp. v. Inzwa Technologies, LLC | W.D. Pa. | 4 Jan 2024 | 299 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:24-cv-00006 | DDC Technology, LLC v. Shenzhentaifeikejiyouxiangongsi | W.D. Pa. | 3 Jan 2024 | 587 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:23-cv-02165 | Ameranth, Inc. v. DoorDash, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 22 Dec 2023 | 704 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:23-cv-01907 | D Squared Plant Traps, LLC v. Guangdong Bixing Trading Co., Ltd. | W.D. Pa. | 3 Nov 2023 | 622 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:23-cv-01460 | AQUAPAW Brands, LLC v. Fed Store | W.D. Pa. | 15 Aug 2023 | 727 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 2:23-cv-01327 | Airigan Solutions, LLC v. Rainbow Island Store | W.D. Pa. | 25 Jul 2023 | 69 d | Injunction Granted |
| 2:23-cv-01293 | Happy Hour Thinking, LLC v. Zeus | W.D. Pa. | 18 Jul 2023 | 122 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:23-cv-00735 | I4F Licensing N.V. v. Ollies Bargain Outlet, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 2 May 2023 | 209 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:23-cv-00232 | Airigan Solutions, LLC v. Snowqi | W.D. Pa. | 14 Feb 2023 | 93 d | Injunction Granted |
| 2:23-cv-00205 | Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Vector Security, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 8 Feb 2023 | 62 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-01776 | Ameranth, Inc. v. DoorDash, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 9 Dec 2022 | 797 d | Case Transferred |
| 2:22-cv-01607 | AQUAPAW Brands, LLC v. Joyi Yan | W.D. Pa. | 15 Nov 2022 | 184 d | Injunction Granted |
| 2:22-cv-01609 | Broadway Pine Brands, LLC v. Bonjin-US | W.D. Pa. | 15 Nov 2022 | 169 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 2:22-cv-01584 | Pawesome Pet Products, LLC v. Dreambliss Stores | W.D. Pa. | 9 Nov 2022 | 370 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-01394 | Onstream Media, Corp. v. Chorus Call, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 3 Oct 2022 | 133 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-00717 | The University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Cook Mysite, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 13 May 2022 | 1056 d | Case Settled |
| 2:22-cv-00629 | Pawesome Pet Products, LLC v. Colorflowers | W.D. Pa. | 28 Apr 2022 | 565 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 2:22-cv-00367 | Chuanqi Liu v. Foujoy | W.D. Pa. | 1 Mar 2022 | 521 d | Judgment on the merits for Defendant |
| 2:22-cv-00135 | Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Testo, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 12 Jan 2022 | 996 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:21-cv-00246 | Eyenavision, Inc. v. Enchroma, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 19 Feb 2021 | 756 d | Consent Judgment |
| 1:19-cv-00146 | Troy Wilson v. TPK, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 17 May 2019 | 1963 d | Case Dismissed |
How patent cases run in this court
Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.
Analyse this court- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.