Tennessee Western District Court Patent litigation record

Court 8 cases

8 patent cases on record in Tennessee Western District Court. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

8 cases on record

Cases on record
8
Court level
District Court
District
Western District of Tennessee
Judge seen
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:25-cv-03153 California Innovations, Inc. v. Fuse, LLC W.D. Tenn. 19 Dec 2025 89 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-01167 Mgp Caliper Covers, LLC v. Rough Country, LLC W.D. Tenn. 10 Aug 2023 236 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-02430 K.Mizra, LLC v. Brother Industries USA, Inc. W.D. Tenn. 17 Jul 2023 343 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-02413 Solenis Technologies, LP v. Buckman Laboratories, Inc. W.D. Tenn. 7 Jul 2023 378 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:22-cv-02838 Chris A. Pritchard v. Aaron Thompson W.D. Tenn. 9 Dec 2022 444 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:22-cv-02251 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brother Industries (USA), Inc. W.D. Tenn. 21 Apr 2022 326 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-02236 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brother Industries, Ltd. W.D. Tenn. 15 Apr 2022 332 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-02237 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. W.D. Tenn. 15 Apr 2022 332 d Consent Judgment
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases recorded in Tennessee Western District Court. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How patent cases run in this court

Volume, duration and termination patterns, drawn from the docket record.

Analyse this court
10,000 free credits to start

Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.

No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.