Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.
Infringement action filed 24 Aug 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and closed 22 Nov 2023, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US10841958B2US10932207B2US11134400B2US10484976B2US11196509B2
- Case no.
- 3:23-cv-01560
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- S.D. Cal.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- California
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 24 Aug 2023 – 22 Nov 2023
- Duration
- 90 days
- Basis of termination
- Case Dismissed
- Products & marks
- 5G-capable devices such as iPhones and iPads
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Access node, a method for an access node, a wireless terminal and a method for a wireless terminal
Method and apparatus use a value tag in conjunction with transmission and/or processing of system information in a wireless communication network, especially in conjunction with second type system information or non-essentially type system information. In certain example embodiment and modes, an access node (22) may initiate broadcasting second type system information when its content gets updated, in order to avoid many on-demand delivery requests from wireless terminals. In certain example implementations, the access node (22) may compress second type system information to be delivered by broadcast.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 17 Nov 2020
- Earliest priority
- 28 Jul 2016
- Est. expiry
- 25 Jul 2037
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2024-00402 · Patentability · filed by AT&T, Inc.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- ISHII, ATSUSHI
- Classification
- H04W74/08H04W72/04H04W48/12H04W88/02H04W48/10H04W74/0833
- Prosecution counsel
- Atlantic IP
- Examiner
- HONG, DUNG
Terminal apparatus, base station apparatus, communication method, and integrated circuit
A terminal apparatus increments a transmit counter based on a failure of random access response reception or contention resolution, and receives information for indicating a higher layer parameter powerRampingStep(1) and information for indicating a higher layer parameter powerRampingStep(2). A transmit power for PRACH transmission in a first step of a 2 step contention based random access procedure is given based at least on the transmission counter and the higher layer parameter powerRampingStep(1), and a transmit power for PUSCH transmission in the first step of the 2 step contention based random access procedure is given based at least on the transmission counter and the higher layer parameter powerRampingStep(2).
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 23 Feb 2021
- Earliest priority
- 20 Feb 2017
- Est. expiry
- 15 Feb 2038
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2024-00310 · Patentability · filed by AT&T, Inc.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- SUZUKI, SHOICHI · OUCHI, WATARU · YOSHIMURA, TOMOKI · LIU, LIQING
- Classification
- H04W76/18H04W74/08H04W52/36H04W76/11H04W76/27H04W52/22H04W80/08H04W74/0833H04W74/0836H04W74/0838
- Prosecution counsel
- IMPERIUM PATENT WORKS
- Examiner
- CHOWDHURY, HARUN
Also asserted in this case
3 moreThe docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Parties of record
Daingean Technologies Ltd.
- Core tech
- H04W74/08H04W72/04H04W48/12H04W88/02
- Counsel
- Alden G. Harris · Amir H. Alavi · Blaine Andrew Larson · Demetrios Anaipakos · Eric J. Enger · James Richard Patterson · Jennifer M. French · Justin Yee-Jin Chen · Michael D. McBride · Michael F. Heim · Robert Allan Bullwinkel
- Firm
- Alavi & Anaipakos PLLC, Heim Payne & Chorush LLP, Patterson Law Group APC
Apple, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Alexander E. Middleton · Allen S. Cross · James R. Batchelder · Kevin J. Post · Lance W. Shapiro · Nancy Attalla · Rachael S. Bacha · Ryan C. Brunner · Stepan Starchenko
- Firm
- Ropes & Gray, LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alden G. Harris | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Amir H. Alavi | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Blaine Andrew Larson | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Demetrios Anaipakos | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Eric J. Enger | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| James Richard Patterson | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Jennifer M. French | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Justin Yee-Jin Chen | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Michael D. McBride | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Michael F. Heim | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Robert Allan Bullwinkel | Daingean Technologies Ltd. | Plaintiff |
| Alexander E. Middleton | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Allen S. Cross | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| James R. Batchelder | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Kevin J. Post | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Lance W. Shapiro | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Nancy Attalla | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Rachael S. Bacha | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Ryan C. Brunner | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
| Stepan Starchenko | Apple, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. and Defendant Apple Inc. have filed a Joint Motion Stipulating to Dismissal. (Doc. 46.) The parties stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of Daingean Technologies’ claims against Apple and dismissal without prejudice of Apple’s counterclaims against Daingean Technologies. (Id. at 2.) The Joint Motion is GRANTED. Daingean Technologies’ claims are dismissed with prejudice and Apple’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the Joint Motion, each party shall bear their own costs and fees.”
Case 3:23-cv-01560 · S.D. Cal. · closed 22 November 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 3:23-cv-01560?
3:23-cv-01560 is a patent infringement action brought by Daingean Technologies Ltd. against Apple, Inc., filed on 24 Aug 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The case closed on 22 November 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 3:23-cv-01560?
US10841958B2 (“Access node, a method for an access node, a wireless terminal and a method for a wireless terminal”), assigned to DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., currently active; US10932207B2 (“Terminal apparatus, base station apparatus, communication method, and integrated circuit”), assigned to DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., currently active; US11134400B2 (“User equipment, base station, and related methods”), assigned to DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.|SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA; US10484976B2 (“Signaling, procedures, user equipment and base stations for uplink ultra reliable low latency communications”), assigned to DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.|SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA; US11196509B2 (“Terminal apparatus, base station apparatus, and communication method”), assigned to SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA|DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.. The record also lists 5G-capable devices such as iPhones and iPads.
How was case 3:23-cv-01560 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. and Defendant Apple Inc. have filed a Joint Motion Stipulating to Dismissal. (Doc. 46.) The parties stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of Daingean Technologies’ claims against Apple and dismissal without prejudice of Apple’s counterclaims against Daingean Technologies. (Id. at 2.) The Joint Motion is GRANTED. Daingean Technologies’ claims are dismissed with prejudice and Apple’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the Joint Motion, each party shall bear their own costs and fees.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 3:23-cv-01560 take?
90 calendar days, from filing on 24 Aug 2023 to closure on 22 November 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:23-cv-01560?
Alden G. Harris, Amir H. Alavi, Blaine Andrew Larson, Demetrios Anaipakos, Eric J. Enger, James Richard Patterson, Jennifer M. French, Justin Yee-Jin Chen, Michael D. McBride, Michael F. Heim and Robert Allan Bullwinkel are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Daingean Technologies. Alexander E. Middleton, Allen S. Cross, James R. Batchelder, Kevin J. Post, Lance W. Shapiro, Nancy Attalla, Rachael S. Bacha, Ryan C. Brunner and Stepan Starchenko appear for defendant Apple.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:23-cv-01560 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.