Infringement action filed 17 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 11 Sep 2023, with 9 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.
Methods and apparatus for determining a domain based on the content and context of a natural language utterance · Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions · System and method for filtering and eliminating noise from natural language utterances to improve speech recognition and parsing · Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:23-cv-00061, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
A mobile system is provided that includes speech-based and non-speech-based interfaces for telematics applications. The mobile system identifies and uses context, prior information, domain knowledge, and user specific profile data to achieve a natural environment for users that submit requests and/or commands in multiple domains. The invention creates, stores and uses extensive personal profile information for each user, thereby improving the reliability of determining the context and presenting the expected results for a particular question or command. The invention may organize domain specific behavior and information into agents, that are distributable or updateable over a wide area network.
Systems and methods for receiving natural language queries and/or commands and execute the queries and/or commands. The systems and methods overcomes the deficiencies of prior art speech query and response systems through the application of a complete speech-based information query, retrieval, presentation and command environment. This environment makes significant use of context, prior information, domain knowledge, and user specific profile data to achieve a natural environment for one or more users making queries or commands in multiple domains. Through this integrated approach, a complete speech-based natural language query and response environment can be created. The systems and methods creates, stores and uses extensive personal profile information for each user, thereby improving the reliability of determining the context and presenting the expected results for a particular question or command.
3 on recordIPR2024-00746 · Patentability · filed by Google LLCIPR2025-01351 · Patentability · filed by MicrosoftIPR2025-01334 · Patentability · filed by META PLATFORMS, INC
The docket lists 9 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 7 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket.Compare both portfolios
Outcome
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim
"Plaintiff Dialect, LLC (“Dialect”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. jointly submit a redacted copy of the Court’s Order, dated August 28, 2023, (Dkt. 17), granting the Joint Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 15)."
Case 2:23-cv-00061 · E.D. Tex. · closed 11 September 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
2:23-cv-00061 is a patent infringement action brought by Dialect, LLC against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., filed on 17 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 11 September 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 2:23-cv-00061?
US9495957B2 (“Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC, currently inactive; US7398209B2 (“Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC, currently inactive; US7917367B2 (“Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US7502738B2 (“Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US8447607B2 (“Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US9734825B2 (“Methods and apparatus for determining a domain based on the content and context of a natural language utterance”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US8140327B2 (“System and method for filtering and eliminating noise from natural language utterances to improve speech recognition and parsing”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US8849652B2 (“Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC; US8195468B2 (“Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions”), assigned to DIALECT, LLC. The record also lists Methods and apparatus for determining a domain based on the content and context of a natural language utterance, Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions, System and method for filtering and eliminating noise from natural language utterances to improve speech recognition and parsing and Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance.
How was case 2:23-cv-00061 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: "Plaintiff Dialect, LLC (“Dialect”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. jointly submit a redacted copy of the Court’s Order, dated August 28, 2023, (Dkt. 17), granting the Joint Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 15)."
How long did case 2:23-cv-00061 take?
206 calendar days, from filing on 17 Feb 2023 to closure on 11 September 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00061?
Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap presided. Andrea Leigh Fair, Charles Everingham IV and Claire Abernathy Henry are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Dialect. Melissa Richards Smith appears for defendant Samsung Electronics.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:23-cv-00061 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00061 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
