Digi Portal, LLC v. V.F, Corp.
Infringement action filed 27 Sep 2021 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and closed 31 May 2023, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US7565359B2US9626342B2US5983227AUS7171414B1US8352854B2
- Case no.
- 1:21-cv-01357
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D. Del.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Delaware
- Chief judge
- Maryellen Noreika
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 27 Sep 2021 – 31 May 2023
- Duration
- 611 days
- Basis of termination
- Case Dismissed
- Products & marks
- Dynamic page generator
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Dynamic page generator
An custom page server is provided with user preferences organized into templates stored in compact data structures and the live data used to fill the templates stored local to the page server which is handing user requests for custom pages. One process is executed on the page server for every request. The process is provided a user template for the user making the request, where the user template is either generated from user preferences or retrieved from a cache of recently used user templates. Each user process is provided access to a large region of shared memory which contains all of the live data needed to fill any user template. Typically, the pages served are news pages, giving the user a custom selection of stock quotes, news headlines, sports scores, weather, and the like. With the live data stored in a local, shared memory, any custom page can be built within the page server, eliminating the need to make requests from other servers for portions of the live data. While the shared memory might include RAM (random access memory) and disk storage, in many computer systems, it is faster to store all the live data in RAM.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 21 Jul 2009
- Est. expiry
- 12 Jun 2017
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- NAZEM, FARZAD · PATEL, ASHVINKUMAR P.
- Classification
- G06F17/30G06F40/143
- Prosecution counsel
- GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
- Examiner
- CORRIELUS, JEAN M
Dynamic page generator
An custom page server is provided with user preferences organized into templates stored in compact data structures and the live data used to fill the templates stored local to the page server which is handing user requests for custom pages. One process is executed on the page server for every request. The process is provided a user template for the user making the request, where the user template is either generated from user preferences or retrieved from a cache of recently used user templates. Each user process is provided access to a large region of shared memory which contains all of the live data needed to fill any user template. Typically, the pages served are news pages, giving the user a custom selection of stock quotes, news headlines, sports scores, weather, and the like. With the live data stored in a local, shared memory, any custom page can be built within the page server, eliminating the need to make requests from other servers for portions of the live data. While the shared memory might include RAM (random access memory) and disk storage, in many computer systems, it is faster to store all the live data in RAM.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 18 Apr 2017
- Est. expiry
- 20 Nov 2019
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- NAZEM, FARZAD · PATEL, ASHVINKUMAR P.
- Classification
- G06F17/22G06F17/30G06Q30/02H04W4/02H04L29/08G06F40/143
- Prosecution counsel
- GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
- Examiner
- RIES, LAURIE
Also asserted in this case
3 moreThe docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Parties of record
Digi Portal, LLC
- Core tech
- G06F17/30G06F40/143G06F17/22G06Q30/02
- Counsel
- David R. Bennett · Jimmy C. Chong
- Firm
- Chong Law Firm PA
V.F, Corp.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Collin J. Marshall · Jeremy Douglas Anderson · Neil J. McNabnay · Ricardo J. Bonilla
- Firm
- Fish & Richardson PC
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David R. Bennett | Digi Portal, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Jimmy C. Chong | Digi Portal, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Collin J. Marshall | V.F, Corp. | Defendant |
| Jeremy Douglas Anderson | V.F, Corp. | Defendant |
| Neil J. McNabnay | V.F, Corp. | Defendant |
| Ricardo J. Bonilla | V.F, Corp. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), Plaintiff Digi Portal LLC and Defendant VF Outdoor, LLC hereby stipulate that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and all counterclaims asserted by Defendant against Plaintiff be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each Party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”
Case 1:21-cv-01357 · D. Del. · closed 31 May 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:21-cv-01357?
1:21-cv-01357 is a patent infringement action brought by Digi Portal, LLC against V.F, Corp., filed on 27 Sep 2021 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case closed on 31 May 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 1:21-cv-01357?
US7565359B2 (“Dynamic page generator”), assigned to DIGI PORTAL LLC, currently inactive; US9626342B2 (“Dynamic page generator”), assigned to DIGI PORTAL LLC, currently inactive; US5983227A (“Dynamic page generator”), assigned to DIGI PORTAL LLC; US7171414B1 (“Dynamic page generator”), assigned to DIGI PORTAL LLC; US8352854B2 (“Dynamic page generator”), assigned to DIGI PORTAL LLC. The record also lists Dynamic page generator.
How was case 1:21-cv-01357 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), Plaintiff Digi Portal LLC and Defendant VF Outdoor, LLC hereby stipulate that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and all counterclaims asserted by Defendant against Plaintiff be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each Party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:21-cv-01357 take?
611 calendar days, from filing on 27 Sep 2021 to closure on 31 May 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:21-cv-01357?
Chief Judge Maryellen Noreika presided. David R. Bennett and Jimmy C. Chong are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Digi Portal. Collin J. Marshall, Jeremy Douglas Anderson, Neil J. McNabnay and Ricardo J. Bonilla appear for defendant V.F.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:21-cv-01357 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.