Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
DigiMedia Tech v. Hotwire Communications et al. | Patent Lawsuit 1:23-cv-03711

DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Hotwire Communications, LLC et al.

1:23-cv-03711 N.D. Ga. Closed 3 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 21 Aug 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and closed 7 Dec 2023, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
1:23-cv-03711
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Ga.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Georgia
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
21 Aug 2023 – 7 Dec 2023
Duration
108 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Fision tv programming guides · Fision tv streaming apps
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:23-cv-03711, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8160980B2 Active App. US12/171892

Information system based on time, space and relevance

An information system based on time, space and relevance is provided. The system comprises a client that displays information in a user-friendly manner and is located in a domestic environment; a proxy that handles the collection and parsing of data; a server that gathers usage data from the client; a database data mining cluster that allows for user profiling and time, space and relevance analysis; a set of information channels, which are periodically updated, and upon which automatic suggestions are given based on a user profile.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
17 Apr 2012
Earliest priority
13 Jul 2007
Est. expiry
26 Jan 2031
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F17/00G06N5/00
Examiner
GAFFIN, JEFFREY A
US8160980B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US6807568B1 Inactive App. US09/625646

Recipient selection of information to be subsequently delivered

Users may record abstracts of information that they desire and information providers may access the recorded information abstracts from time to time so as to provide the information content that matches the requested information. In one embodiment, the user may select a TV program (or movie) that is not currently available and then at a time subsequent thereto that program is made available to the user, either privately, or over the public network. In another embodiment, users of the Internet may record information requests. Information providers may then access these requests from time to time and provide the requested information, even if the information had not been available at the time the request was initially posted. Prior to delivery of the information content the parties, if desired, may negotiate when and how delivery will occur, how much information will be provided, the cost of the information and the responsibilities of each of the parties pertaining to that information. The information abstract may be stored local to the user or at one or more central sites.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
19 Oct 2004
Est. expiry
17 Jun 2022
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04N7/173H04N5/782H04N5/445
Prosecution counsel
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
Examiner
LIM, KRISNA

Also asserted in this case

1 more

The docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant having not yet filed or served upon Plaintiff either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice.”

Case 1:23-cv-03711 · N.D. Ga. · closed 7 December 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:23-cv-03711?

1:23-cv-03711 is a patent infringement action brought by DigiMedia Tech, LLC against Hotwire Communications, LLC, filed on 21 Aug 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The case closed on 7 December 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 1:23-cv-03711?

US8160980B2 (“Information system based on time, space and relevance”), assigned to DIGIMEDIA TECH, LLC, currently active; US6807568B1 (“Recipient selection of information to be subsequently delivered”), assigned to UNION BEACH, L.P., currently inactive; US7065778B1 (“Method and system for providing media from remote locations to a viewer”), assigned to DIGIMEDIA TECH, LLC. The record also lists Fision tv programming guides and Fision tv streaming apps.

How was case 1:23-cv-03711 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant having not yet filed or served upon Plaintiff either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 1:23-cv-03711 take?

108 calendar days, from filing on 21 Aug 2023 to closure on 7 December 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-03711?

Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. presided. Cortney Alexander and Daniel Arthur Kent are recorded as counsel for plaintiff DigiMedia Tech. Aakash Kamal Patel, Coraleine Jiji Kitt, Michael J. Bonella and Ryan Gentes appear for defendant Hotwire Communications.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:23-cv-03711 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-03711 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.